dCS Vivaldi digital playback system

More than a decade ago, Data Conversion Systems, aka dCS, released the Elgar Plus DAC, Purcell upsampler, and Verdi SACD/CD transport, for a total price of $34,000. In 2009 came the Scarlatti—a stack of four components for $80,000, also available individually (see my August 2009 review). The latest variation on the English company's theme are the four Vivaldi components, launched at the end of 2012 for a total price of $108,496.

The Scarlattis improved on the Elgar Pluses in cosmetics and, more important, technical and sonic performance that, in the opinion of many, put it at the top of the digital audio heap. It will be obvious to those familiar with the Scarlatti stack that the Vivaldis take visual appearance and fit'n'finish to new heights. These sculpted boxes in a silver matte finish, each with a unique, flowing wave pattern machined into its front panel, are pleasing to the eye and silky-smooth to the touch. Who said engineering geeks aren't sensual?

The four components are: the Vivaldi DAC ($34,999, slightly more than the original Elgar-Purcell-Verdi combo), which, using can decode every digital resolution, from MP3 to DSD to DXD (a 24-bit/358.8kHz PCM format used primarily for editing DSD files) and everything in between; the Vivaldi Upsampler ($19,999), which can upconvert the lowest-resolution MP3 data to 24/384, DSD, and DXD or any format in between; the Vivaldi Master Clock ($13,499), containing two groups of four clock outputs, which can be independently set; and the Vivaldi Transport ($39,999), a smooth, quiet, quick-booting SACD/CD drive based on TEAC's Esoteric VRDS Neo disc mechanism, considered by many to be the world's finest (footnote 1). This is controlled by dCS-designed signal-processing electronics, and can also upsample CDs to DSD or DXD.

The total price is an astronomical $108,496, though of course you could start with just the DAC and save $73,497. Considering the cost of some preamplifiers, audiophiles with only a single source component can drive their power amplifier directly with the Vivaldi DAC, which has a digital-domain volume control, and save the cost of a standalone preamp.

114dcs.bac1.jpg

Most audiophiles prepared to drop $35k on a DAC will head straight for the full stack, I feel, especially those who want to add a music server, since the Upsampler includes an Ethernet connection for network streaming via UPnP. (dCS makes available a free iPad app to work with UPnP-based servers.) While both the DAC and the Upsampler have an asynchronous USB-B port, to allow them to accept audio data from a computer, the Upsampler also has a USB-A port, for use with USB flash drives or i-Devices. The USB-B ports can operate in Type 1 mode, with data sampled up to 96kHz, or in Type 2 mode, which allows DSD and PCM up to 192kHz to be streamed to the Vivaldis. Type 1 operation doesn't require a driver program for Windows PCs or Macs; Type 2 operation doesn't need a driver with Mac OS10.6.3 or later; dCS supplies a driver program for Type2 operation with Windows XP and Windows 7. (They say that it will work with Windows 8 in Windows 7 compatibility mode.) The dCS driver is not compatible with ASIO-type drivers, which will need to be uninstalled.

In other words, while continuing to offer a transport option for those with large collections of CDs and SACDs, dCS has configured the Vivaldi for the discless future—already the present for some, particularly those who never got into SACDs—though it will still be some time before downloadable DSD content catches up with what's already available on disc.

Major Changes Inside
Compared with the older products, the structural rigidity of the Vivaldi components' cases has been upgraded, including top plates of thick aluminum into which are machined asymmetrical cavities that contain damping pads. The combination is said to reduce vibrational modes. But the Vivaldi DAC's insides have been given far more than a cosmetic makeover.

While dCS's products have all been based on the company's proprietary Ring DAC technology, the Vivaldi is based on a complete revision of the Ring DAC concept. The earlier Ring DAC used quad latches (a circuit element that can be instantaneously "flipped" between two stable states) to select current sources based on metal-film resistors. The new Ring DAC design still includes high-speed latches and metal-film resistors, but instead uses individual latch chips said to eliminate between-latch, on-chip crosstalk resulting in lower jitter. The total number of latches has been increased to make better use of the Ring DAC's available dynamic range. A pair of high-speed, software-updatable (FPGAs) replaces the Scarlatti's mapping ROM chips, which allows individual errors in the DAC's current sources to be randomized, reducing the level of distortion and spuriae by 3dB.

The Vivaldi DAC's and Upsampler's digital-processing platform, which runs dCS-developed and -maintained code that forms the core of the entire operating system, has been completely upgraded, including use of a single field-programmable gate array (FPGA) chip with more than twice the capacity of the previous two chips combined. These FPGAs are programmed from flash memory each time the DAC powers up, so that performance improvements or new Ring DAC operating modes can be added with a firmware update.

114dcs.bac2.jpg

The Vivaldi DAC's analog circuitry has been redesigned for reduced DC offset, lower noise, and less crosstalk. The completely dual-mono architecture is claimed to improve left/right crosstalk by 15dB at 20kHz. New, higher-output mains transformers in all of the Vivaldi components run cooler than in earlier dCS products, and are mounted on specially damped subchassis to eliminate vibrations. Even the transport has been given a serious mechanical upgrade, which is claimed to reduce the level of acoustic noise by a significant 10dB.

The Vivaldi stack's exterior elegance sacrifices some user-friendliness: the small buttons and their even smaller labels aren't backlit, so if you like doing your digital business in the dark, or even in moderate light, keep a flashlight handy.

The non-backlit remote control suffers a similar problem. While it's a heavy, nicely made piece of aluminum finished pleasingly for the hand, its brushed-aluminum surface makes it difficult to read the labels just below the unmarked buttons unless it's angled just so to reflect any available light. But when you do that, the reflected glare makes the buttons that are marked hard to read.

Setup and Use
Setting up the Vivaldi system can be complicated, but when you spend almost $110,000 on a digital playback system, you can expect plenty of dealer help. The multi-cable system, featuring five AES/EBU cables—two each to connect the Transport and Upsampler to the DAC and a fifth to connect the Transport to the Upsampler—five word-clock connections, and four AC cords, is a cable manufacturer's dream.

But once everything has been set up for you, and the routing for each input and the many screen icons have been explained, you're on your own. Believe me, until you figure it all out and memorize the icons' meanings, you'll feel lonely.

Your options are then seemingly endless. For example, you can route the transport directly to the DAC via the dual AES/EBU connections, which will send DSD signals in their native format and, should you choose, upsample CDs to DSD or DXD—or you can send CD signals to the DAC via S/PDIF or AES/EBU and play them in their native resolution—or send CD data to the Upsampler via the single AES/EBU connection and, by selecting the Upsampler's AES input, play them back at 24/44.1 (the Upsampler automatically outputs at 24 bits)— or you can upsample the CD data there to high-resolution PCM or DSD.

The Vivaldi DAC has six filter options for PCM, with four more for DSD playback. dCS says that with PCM data, the first four filters give different tradeoffs between ultrasonic image rejection and impulse response. Filter 1 gives the most rejection, Filters 2–4 offer progressively relaxed image rejection and better time-domain performance. For data with sample rates from 176.4kHz to 384kHz, two extra filters are available, one with a Gaussian character, the other asymmetrical with almost no pre-ringing. With CD data, Filter 5 is also an asymmetrical type, Filter 6 a very sharp linear-phase type with pre-ringing. The DSD filters progressively roll off the format's ultrasonic noise, in case there are system synergy issues.

dCS recommends Filter 5for CD playback, Filter 2 for 48, 88.2, and 96kHz-sampled data, Filter 6 for 176.4kHz data and above, and Filter 1 for DSD data. For this review, I stuck with Filter 1, which had been recommended by dCS distributor John Quick.



Footnote 1: Why should a disc drive be so expensive? dCS claims that they pay about $5000 for each raw TEAC transport; if you do the usual fivefold "parts cost to retail" math, that's $25,000—then you have to add the chassis, the electronics, and the rest.
COMPANY INFO
dCS (Data Conversion Systems), Ltd.
US distributor: dCS America
PO Box 544, 3057 Nutley Street
Fairfax, VA 22031
(617) 314-9296
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
wozwoz's picture

Nice review ... but one comment caught my eye:

> "dCS has configured the Vivaldi for the discless future"

The discless future???  Hmm .... according to the latest industry figures:

http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/news/digital-and-mobile/5855162/digital-music-sales-decrease-for-first-time-in-2013

... downloads are already on the way down.

Current industry figures are:

* vinyl is 2% of album sales in the U.S; 

* digital albums == 40.6% of album sales

* the CD is 57.2% 

So, after 13 years of downloads, .... downloads themselves are being eaten up by even lower quality streaming, and physical formats remain dominant. 

In summary: I think dCS will get their bread and butter from selling the hi-rez SACD player here ...  Certainly, if I won the lottery, that's the component I would shoot for.

ashandger's picture

Hello Michael, many thanks for the excellent review....highly informative. Would it be possible for you to expand on the differences between the Vivaldi and the MSB Diamond system in terms of rhythm and pace, microdynamics, intrumental timbres and soundstage perspective (is one row 10 and the other row 30 for example). Look forward to hearing your thoughts. Many thanks, Ash

X