Western Electric Type No.91E integrated amplifier Page 2

The 91E's 49lb machined-aluminum chassis, 18.9" wide, 15" deep, and 11.1" high, boasts an appealing industrial design that befits its heritage. It is big, bold, and beautiful, and its 6" tall, 1" thick faceplate commands your attention.

On the left side of the faceplate, in a recessed panel, a column of pushbuttons allow source selection: phono, CD, tuner, aux 1, aux 2, and Bluetooth. In the center, a raised 4" × 2.5" glass display, which is easily legible from across the room, shows the selected input, the volume level, and twin VU meters. Near the bottom of the screen, the Western Electric logo glows proudly. A 2.5" volume dial dominates the right side of the faceplate, above a power button, an LED status indicator, and a ¼" headphone jack.

Behind the faceplate and atop the chassis, the 8 ohm transformer block is set between a pair of ECC81 driver tubes. Behind, on either side, stand the two 300B power tubes in their protective glass cylinders. A ½"-thick aluminum plate with ventilation grids caps the cylinders.

The back panel is all business. The left section accommodates eight gold-plated RCA pairs—labeled Phono Load, Phono In, CD, Tuner, Aux1, Aux2, Line Out, and Pre Out—as well as a ground screw and an MC/MM toggle switch. A pair of speaker binding posts is set in a small, separate section, and a third section contains Ethernet and USB inputs (both for firmware updates only), two 3.5mm control jacks, and an IEC jack. The 91E stands on four rubber-and-metal feet.

The minimalist, black aluminum remote is cleanly laid out with the essential functionality. The display dimmer is a nice touch.

Aesthetically and functionally, the 91E is a well-thought-out, well-built product. Its controls feel smooth and solid, and they performed without a glitch. Western Electric's attention to every detail was obvious, starting with the hinged, cherrywood shipping box for the 300B tubes and packing materials: dense, formfitting foam-rubber sections for the amplifier, a screwdriver, a pin straightener, and a wrench for removing the protective grids. Heirloom-quality stuff. Accessories included a thick, hospital-grade power cord unlike any other I've seen.

I've reviewed amplifiers with loose internal parts, confusing manuals, and poorly labeled options. The 91E harks back to the golden era of US manufacturing when superb craftsmanship was standard practice for a successful American business.

SET coherence
I well remember my first encounter with an SET amplifier. Before I bought my Shindo Allegro preamplifiers and Shindo Haut Brion push-pull power amplifier (20Wpc), the Art Audio Diavolo, which used a pair of KR VV32B power tubes to produce 13Wpc, was my amplifier of choice. The sound was what I associate with the classic SET personality. Pancakes with butter and ladles of syrup, the Diavolo sounded heavenly, with all the richness and profundity of mass in a large NYC church. Was the Diavolo transparent? Hardly. But it sounded refined, pure, and hypnotic on jazz and classical records, and it bloomed like nobody's business.

The 91E is the opposite, in every imaginable way. It is one of the most neutral, down-the-center, frequency-pure amplifiers I've reviewed. While it delivered that sweet 'n pure triode-treble audiophiles relish, and a room-filling soundstage, it exhibited a trait not commonly associated with tube amplifiers, let alone SET amps: as Whitener claimed, the 91E's low end was tight and accurate. Whether spinning Weather Report or Wagner, Brubeck or Brahms, if deep bass was impressed into the vinyl, the 91E delivered, time after time.

The uber-coherent 91E never favored one part of the frequency spectrum over another, never exploded in treble peaks, never mired me in blobby bass. The 91E's transparent midrange worked its magic in concert with its (largely) grain-free treble and fast, dense bass. This is unusual in my tube-amp experience: My old BAT VK-75 and its KT88s hit hard with tight bass, but I never enjoyed its sound as a whole. My beloved Shindo Haut Brion delivers lovely lows: soft, a little loose, somewhat rich, but texturally and timbrally perfect. The 91E, by comparison, lacks the enveloping bass and weight of the Shindo, but it is convincing in its grip and clarity, whether on acoustic bass, electric bass, joyously thumped bass drums, timpani, or the bottom end of a cello.

1022we.HadleyCalimanCover

Listening
Standard jazz history tells us that when fusion became popular, in the late '60s, the market for crusty swingers like Dexter Gordon and Hank Mobley dried up—that jazz was dead until Wynton Marsalis and the Young Lions rescued it in the 1980s. But (mostly) smaller indie labels including Black Jazz, Ovation, Strata-East, Catalyst, Artists House, Cobblestone, Inner City, Muse, Mainstream, Xanadu, and Groove Merchant continued to record talented jazz heads throughout the '70s. Horace Tapscott, Art Ensemble of Chicago, Black Artists Group, Arista Freedom, Enja, ECM Records, and others explored esoteric jazz territory: keyboardists Mickey Tucker, Neal Creque, and Charles Earland; guitarists Roland Prince, Calvin Keys, O'Donel Levy, and Pat Martino; and saxophonists Charles McPherson, Eric Kloss, and Hadley Caliman expanded the traditional boundaries of jazz. Guitarist Mel Brown created some of the nastiest blues skank this side of Lightnin' Hopkins.

1022we.CrequeCover

In my listening, the 91E made the most of these artists' records, framing each in its own flatly recorded '70s jazz milieu. Mel Brown's Blues for We (Impulse! A-9180) was presented cleanly with a broad instrumental soundstage of startling immediacy. Every area of the stage was illuminated, and the smallest ambient details were convincingly realized. "Clarity," "detail," and "depth" fill my listening notes. The 91E excelled at creating the extravagant space and stinging textures of Neal Creque's funky jazz-and-soul on Creque (Cobblestone 9005); created scale and force on Hadley Caliman's Hadley Caliman (Mainstream Records MRL 318); and reproduced the intimate, small-studio coziness of Mickey Tucker's 1977 release Sojourn (Xanadu Records 143).

1022we.MelBrownCover

Comparing my Tavish Audio Design Adagio phono preamplifier with Sculpture A Mini Nano SUT to the 91E's onboard phono stage, the Tavish had more weight, bloom, and tonal color. The 91E's phono stage was cleaner though and provided more definition. It played with force, extracting more detail and revealing more instrumental complexity.

1022we.SojournCover

The 91E delivered treble clearly, without scorch or grit, preserved dynamics effortlessly, and presented recordings with drive and dimensionality that made listening a fun, energetic experience.

My DeVore Fidelity O/96 loudspeakers benefited from the 91E's tight bass, their 10" paper-cone woofers as well-controlled as by any solid state amplifier. Oddly, the 91E sounded less like a traditional tube amplifier with the O/96s—less so, for example, than the class-D LKV Research PWR-3 I recently reviewed. My Shindos, too, sounded more tube-like, overall, than the 91E, displaying rounder, richer tone and more enveloping soundstage bloom.

1022we.4

The 91E reached more of its potential with the Fleetwood DeVille loudspeakers. The SET treble truly shone in its clarity and detail. The amplifier's coherence and neutral demeanor were more evident, too. Despite the O/96s' higher specified frequency response, the 91E drove more detail through the DeVille's compression-driver tweeter than through the O/96's 1" silk-dome tweeter. But both speakers sounded fantastic with the 91E: clean, clear, and palpable.

Conclusion
Charles Whitener's claims about his Western Electric 91E integrated amplifier were spot on: The 91E does deliver a "solid low end and extended highs," and it does have the "clarity of the original WE 91A's midrange" and the ability to create an "incredible soundstage."

The 91E is not your traditional treble-and-midrange-champ SET amplifier. In delivering more strength and power without compromising the low end, it's a classy machine that can frame music neutrally in a large soundstage. The 91E elicited consistent musical pleasure. Western Electric is back.

COMPANY INFO
Western Electric
201 West Gordon Ave.
GA 30741
info@westernelectric.com
(404) 352-2000
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
JRT's picture

I think that this should be mentioned as eventual replacement of the tubes is part of the expenses in using the tube amplifier (and the life might be shortened by operation in class A2).

The prices direct from Western Electric for new 300B triodes are currently, $699 each for a single (1) tube, $1499 for a matched pair (2), and $3099 for a matched quad (4). This amplifier uses either two single tubes (unmatched) or a matched pair. The latter would cost $101 more, but might offer better measured performance, perhaps also audible.

JRT's picture

When the preamplifier portion eventually fails, and if repair is impracticable (perhaps some future capacitor leakage destroys an internal layer on the circuit board, or a monolythic integrated circuit fails after it has gone obsolete, out of production, out of support, becoming too difficult to source a replacement component to feasably effect a good repair), then the separate preamplifier could become dumpster fodder while the tube amplifier(s) continue a very long useful life needing occasional replacements of tubes and perhaps also capacitors.

Integrating the components saves build costs (reduces number of separate enclosures, reduces assembly labor, reduces packaging, perhaps also reduces number of separate internal power supplies, etc.). I would argue that it does not save any footprint because a matching separate stereo preamplifier could be designed to stack under the separate stereo tube amplifier. But these are not separated, and I would suggest that the integration is almost all about cost reduction, and in this $15k price level, there should be more than enough budget to avoid the real compromise of excessive integration and the reduction in system flexibility and the reduction in system reliability which both result from that compromise. There should be more than enough in that budget to afford separate components.

JHL's picture

Simply breathtaking. Any passing knowledge of super-triode amps shows this item to be absolutely top-shelf. Thank you for covering it.

(But tubes wear out omg and it just must be a two-piece sez JRT, lol)

Jack L's picture

Hi

"Super triode" topology is a totally 'revolutionary' audio amp design using a triode as active negative feedback device from the plate (P) of the output power tube to its grid, claimed to improve the linearity of the power tube, hence better sound. This topology was invented by Shin-ichi Kamijo, a DIYer of Japan some 30 years back.

I doubt very much such "super triode connection" (STC) topology ever employed by any brandname amps.

Or you mean something else ?

Jack L

JRT's picture

Some decades ago, while designing toroid output transformers for Plitron, Menno van der Veen published at least one whitepaper that included information on his "Super Triode", and he trademarked the phrase. And his is different from Shinichi Kamijo's "Super Triode Connection".

It is described in the paper at the link at the bottom of this post. In that paper, see circuit 7 in figure 1, which is similar to Ultralinear, except with the addition of separate cathode feedback windings (aka cathode feedback tapes) connected to the cathodes with phase such that the cathodes receive negative feedback from the output transformer.

https://pearl-hifi.com/06_Lit_Archive/14_Books_Tech_Papers/Van_der_Veen_Menno/New_Push-Pull_Tube_Amps_Orig.pdf

Jack L's picture

Hi

What are Plitron toroidal transformers to do with "Super triode"???

Triode is a glass tube & transformer is a solid metal impedance converter ???

What is the logics there ?

Jack L

ejlif's picture

whenever I read about tube amps that have all the slam and bass of solid state my thought is why not just get solid state then? I like a tube amp because it sounds that way. I would be interested to compare this amp to the Feliks Arioso 300B. I have that amp and the Decware Zen triode. The Feliks is no wimp and I would say it probably sounds a little bit like solid state in some ways even. To me if you want a tube amp you want zero listening fatigue. To me that is what the hassle of tubes is all about. What you say about the Shindo stuff that sounds very intriguing.

Jack L's picture

Hi

It depends on the design, my friend.

My design/built power amps sound fast, punchy & see thru-transparent like a quality SS amp, yet retain tube's melodic & emotional sonics that SS lacks !

Listening to triodes is believing

Jack L

remlab's picture

..would probably match nicely with these

JRT's picture

... Musical Fidelity 750K Supercharger monoblock power amplifiers (circa 2008). Those booster amplifiers are designed to provide a benign load impedance while also boosting power output to something capable of driving conventional loudspeakers to usable SPLs at usable propagation distances with unclipped signal crests (clipping does not sound good, regardless the technology used to provide signal gain), and with low enough nonlinearity such that the nonlinearities of the tube amplifier dominate the sonic character of the signal gain.

JA1 reviewed a pair:
https://www.stereophile.com/solidpoweramps/1208mf/index.html

Jack L's picture

Hi

Yes, that why trioide sounds better than another other active devcies like pentodes, tetrodes, & all bipolar junction devices, e.g. transistors, FETs, op-amps. Only triodes get truly linear signal transfer curves vs kinked/kneed transfer curves of all other devices.

My skeptical ears hear the sonic difference particularly at high climax volumes !!!

Listening to triode is believing

Jack L

Jack L's picture

Hi

Nope, it is not the "booster amps" "to provide benign load impedance" for driving louspeakers.

It is the "booster amps" should be designed enough to handle the roller-coasting 'hostile' load impedance (R+C+L) of any loudspeakers.

The bench test data provided by most, if not all, brandname amps has been based on resistive dummy loads instead of a loudspeakers since day one decades back.

The Sterophile lab bench-tests any amps under review using simulated loudspeaker loads instead of resistive dummy load, providing measureed data more realistic to the realworld situation.

Jack L

JRT's picture

The SET amplifier is not load invariant, operates with better linearity if driving a benign constant resistive load impedance. The input to the booster amplifier provides a benign constant resistive load impedance to the SET amplifier driving it.

The output of the booster amplifier drives the loudspeaker and is much more nearly invariant to the load presented by the loudspeaker, if operated within the design limits of the booster amplifier.

Jack L's picture

Hi

First off, why NEED a "booster amp" for a SET amp ????

I doubt very much you have auditioned in depth the sonic quality of a SET - melodic & emotional music quality that noooo other tube & SS output power stage designs can match !!!!!

We are talking music QUALITY not quantity, OK ???

So why add a booster amp to ruin the musicality of a SET ? What is your logics ?????

Adding a booster amp to the loudspeaker output of the SET just amplify the SET/programme sources harmonic, phase distortion & noise level. You are opening a hugh can of worms, pal !

So why bother to go for a SET in the first place? Just get a tube power amp with pentode push-pull power stage to deliver much higher power to push your loudspeakers instead.

Sorry, I don't think you appreciate the distinct musicality of a SET at all !!!!

Technically, you think the 8-ohm loudspeaker output of the WE300B SET would be happy to load a typical 50K-100KR input of a booster amp ???? FYI, the best coupling impedance ratio should be 1:10, OK !

Back to the booster power amp, tube or SS respective, it still has to work with the ever-changing complex impedance (C+L+R) of any loudspeakers hooked up to it. Same destiny of a SET! So what if it were operated "within the bench-tested design limits of the booser amp" ????

Good fascination ! Please get real !

Listening to SET is believing

Jack L

Jack L's picture

Hi

Yes, "loop negative feedback" should be not be used in any amps, including phono RIAA EQ, & power amps for best sound.

K. Micallef quoted "91E has zero negative feedback both local & global".

So is there actually any loop NFB in this amp at all per yr captioned quote ?

Jack L

directdriver's picture

"The Western Electric division's own creations include the Orthophonic phonograph, the Westrex cutting-lathe system, the 300B vacuum tube, considered by many the greatest triode power tube ever made, and the 1936 WE 91A single-ended triode (SET) integrated amplifier, which powered cinema systems across the country."

The original WE 91A, I believe, was used as a monitor amp for the projectionist to hear what's playing in the theatre while he's in the projectionist booth. The 91A was not intended to drive speakers for the movie audience.

Jack L's picture

Hi

Agreed.

In 1940 cinema era in USA, the cinema/auditorium loudspeakers started to use the then newly invented efficient permanent magnet: "Alneco" in the speaker unit drivers.

The tube amps also started to use the then newly developed power tubes, e.g. KT66 & 6L6 in 4-6 parallel push-pull configuration to provide up to 40-60 watt "hugh" power for all cinema/auditorium sound systems across the country.

No way WE91A low output power was powerful enough to drive the cinema sound systems back then.

Jack L

X