MoFi Electronics SourcePoint 888 loudspeaker

A recent high point in my career as a reviewer was writing about the MoFi Electronics SourcePoint 10 standmount loudspeaker for the February 2023 issue of Stereophile. Priced at $2999/pair, the two-way SourcePoint 10 featured an innovative 10" coaxial (HF/LF) drive unit and impressed me with its clean, superbly well-defined low frequencies, natural-sounding midrange, and the ability to play loudly without strain.

The SourcePoint 10 was the first MoFi speaker to be designed by Andrew Jones, whose earlier designs for KEF, Infinity, Pioneer, TAD, and ELAC had all taken up residence in Stereophile's Recommended Components listings over the years. The second of Andrew's designs for MoFi was the SourcePoint 8, which was favorably reviewed by Kalman Rubinson in September 2023. Priced at a competitive $1999/pair, the SourcePoint 8 also used a coaxial drive unit, but as the name suggests, the woofer diameter was 8" rather than 10". KR was also impressed by what he heard, writing that the SourcePoint 8 was a balanced, wide-range speaker that demonstrated how satisfying a small, relatively affordable loudspeaker can be.

Now we have Andrew Jones's third design for MoFi, the floorstanding SourcePoint 888, which costs $4999/pair.

The SourcePoint 888 ...
... uses an 8" coaxial driver for the midrange and treble, similar to that used in the SourcePoint 8. This driver is mounted near the top of the sculpted front baffle, accompanied farther down by two 8" woofers. The woofers use a paper cone and are reflex-loaded with two 3"-wide ports on the rear panel. The midrange and woofer cones are terminated with a corrugated surround rather than the usual half-roll rubber surround. With the midrange cone, the obstruction of the half-roll surround would disrupt the tweeter's radiated wavefront.

The crossover between the midrange and woofers is set to 130Hz; that between the midrange and the coaxially mounted 1.25" soft-dome tweeter is at 1.6kHz. The tweeter therefore operates over a wider passband than usual. When I interviewed Andrew Jones for my SourcePoint 10 review, he explained that the coaxial unit's lower-frequency cone acts as a waveguide for the tweeter. The waveguide reduces the tweeter's excursion requirement, so it can be operated down to a lower frequency than would be possible if it lacked a waveguide. With a waveguide, "the improvement in efficiency or sensitivity and the reduction in excursion more than make up for the fact that you're crossing over at 1.6k. It enables you to get a very good progressive, consistent off-axis performance," Jones told me, adding that using a dome with a slightly larger diameter, 1.25" rather than the usual 1", with a wide roll surround, provides extra dynamic range capability at the lower frequencies.

The 888's internally braced enclosure stands just over 42" high on its base and feet—cone feet for carpeted floors and flat-bottomed feet for wooden floors are both provided—and is made from thick MDF. Other than the gray base and the matte-black front baffle, the panels are finished in a Satin Walnut or Black Ash wood veneer. Electrical connection is via two pairs of binding posts close to the base of the rear panel.

Setting up
The main source of music was my Roon Nucleus+ server feeding audio data over my network to a Roon Ready MBL N31 CD player/DAC, which was connected directly to a pair of Parasound JCA100 Tribute monoblock amplifiers. Though the speakers can be biwired, I single-wired them with AudioQuest Robin Hood cable. I didn't use the MoFi SourcePoint 888s' magnetically attached grilles, and the review pair arrived with only the flat feet; the cones recommended for carpeted floors like mine were missing. (The review samples had previously been reviewed by another writer, who must have forgotten to pack the cones in the boxes; footnote 1.) Nevertheless, with a speaker weighing 96lb, coupling the enclosure to the floor should not be an issue.

The SourcePoint 888's manual recommends that the user start by placing the speakers approximately 1–3' away from the room boundaries. After much experimentation, I ended up with the SourcePoint 888s much farther away than that, in an effort to optimally balance the upper bass with the lower midrange. In their final configuration, the speaker's front baffles were 83" from the wall behind the speakers, the right speaker's woofers were 47" from the books that line that speaker's closest sidewall, and the left speaker's woofers were 35" from the LPs that line that speaker's sidewall.

Listening to the 1/3-octave warble tones on my Editor's Choice CD (STPH016-2; no longer available), the SourcePoint 888s in those positions cleanly reproduced the tones with full weight down to the 40Hz band. However, the 32Hz tone was much higher in level than those on either side. As you can read in the Measurements sidebar, the MoFi speaker's port-tuning frequency coincides with that of my room's lowest mode. While this bass boost added some magnificence to orchestral recordings, it was much too much with rock and jazz. I ended up blocking the two speakers' bottom ports with foam plugs. I kept them blocked for most of my listening. I kept the top ports open except as noted in the Listening section.

With the lower ports plugged, the warble tones sounded even down to 32Hz, the 25Hz tone was just audible, and I couldn't hear the 20Hz tone at my usual listening level. The half-step–spaced tonebursts on Editor's Choice spoke cleanly and evenly down to 32Hz. I heard no wind noise from the open ports with the lowest-frequency tones and the tonebursts, and warble tones sounded clean, with no "doubling" (second-harmonic distortion).

Listening
With the MoFi speakers toed-in to the listening position and the coaxially mounted tweeters level with the height of my ears at 36" from the floor, the dual-mono pink noise track on Editor's Choice was reproduced as a stable central image. The high frequencies sounded smooth and the midrange uncolored whether I sat up straight or slouched. I also heard very little "vertical Venetian blind" effect, or comb filtering, as I moved my head from side to side. A touch of emphasis was audible around 3kHz with pink noise, but this was only noticeable with overly bright rock recordings.

With all the SourcePoint 888s' ports open, the hammer-blow drums at the start of Aaron Copland's Fanfare for the Common Man, performed by the Atlanta Symphony Orchestra conducted by Louis Lane (16/44.1 FLAC, Telarc/Qobuz), almost knocked me out of my chair. With the bottom ports blocked, the infamous Telarc bass drum was tamed but still had excellent weight and definition—the rolls on the drum at the end of the Fanfare were cleanly articulated.


Footnote 1: When I packed the speakers to be returned to MoFi Electronics, I found the small boxes with the cones hidden in the foam packaging. Mea culpa.

COMPANY INFO
MoFi Electronics
713 W Ellsworth Rd.
Ann Arbor
MI 48108-3322
(734) 369-3433
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
georgehifi's picture

Great set of measurements from JA, full range speaker for reasonable money for a change. This is what we want to see.

Cheers George

justmeagain's picture

I love the value for money of these recent MoFi speakers. Perhaps some makers of overpriced speakers will take notice. I plan to audition them ASAP. Brilliant!

georgehifi's picture

I could go a pair of Source Point 6 book shelfs if they ever bought them out. Could have a faster upper bass an even better lower mid/mid than the 8, they could also blend better with the tweeter.
And then they'd be a perfect mate for my 2 x tall (twin x 8"in each) active servo controlled subs used as speaker stands for them that I have. https://ibb.co/Zpq6y57j

Cheers George

funambulistic's picture

Have I got a speaker for you (said in my best Ortofan voice)! Nice sub, BTW! https://us.kef.com/products/q3-meta

JohnnyThunder2.0's picture

I find them mechanical sounding and unmusical. Maybe good for home theater and the boomy sizzly type of music. MoFi are warmish and fuller sounding. I even liked Audio Engine speakers better than the little wireless KEFS.

Ortofan's picture

... in my genuine Ortofan voice.

Also for $5K/pr, the Dali Opticon 8 MK2.
Dual 8" woofers like the 888, a 6.5" midrange, plus a dual-driver dome and planar tweeter. Made in Denmark, not PRC.

https://static.dali-speakers.com/en/products/opticon-mk2/opticon-8-mk2/

https://hometheaterhifi.com/reviews/speaker/floor-standing/the-dali-opticon-8-mk2-loudspeaker-review/

https://stereonet.com/reviews/dali-opticon-8-mk2-floorstanding-loudspeakers-review/

funambulistic's picture

... but I believe we were discussing (mostly tongue-in-cheek - at least from me) speaker options with concentric drivers, specifically a 6"er.

Lorenzo-Italia's picture

Dear Andrew. You design excellent speakers with rare value, as soon as one make up his mind to buy one, you promptly come up with a better one and the journey starts again… so the question is: What’s cooking in your mind (or MoFi R&D labs...) and when we could enjoy a (cardioid ?) speaker that control-address also room’s modes so the HiFi man’s journey could come to an end where the entire spectrum will be closer to the source?
If you have the answer, pls let me know, I will wait for it…
My Best Regards
Lorenzo

(P.S. Thank you again for your demo at CES 2020…)

avanti1960's picture

to reduce lower bass output? Interesting and troubling comment because (1) foam ports are not supplied by the manufacturer and aren't "in the box"; (2) we have no idea if the woofer's Qts value (woofer damping) is suitable for being ported and (3) they are already positioned almost 7 feet from the wall behind them. Placing speakers 7 feet into a room is challenging for some and implies that bass reinforcement would be increased if they are closer to the wall.
Seems like a challenging situation to manage for potential buyers.

zipzimzap's picture

I thought I was the only one that thought nearly 7 feet into the room was a bit extreme

Metalhead's picture

Never heard these speakers but gotta believe they deliver way above their price point.

However my friend had TAD drivers designed by Andrew in his setup and they were exquisite and his system was among the very best I have had the pleasure to sit in front of.

DaveinSM's picture

No, read the measurements section. It appears to actually be a slightly overdamped design with extended low frequency response, down to 25hz in room.

His listening room has a mode at 30Hz that is exacerbated by the response of these speakers at that frequency, necessitating plugging the ports and pulling them out into the room.

Presumably, you won’t have to do that in your room if it doesn’t have a similar low frequency mode.

zipzimzap's picture

He references plugging the port and the room mode but with the 7 feet out into the room he says "in an effort to optimally balance the upper bass with the lower midrange." I don't think upper bass or lower midrange have much to do with 30Hz. So that seems like a separate issue.

georgehifi's picture

"It appears to actually be a slightly overdamped design with extended low frequency response, down to 25hz in room."
'JA: The minimum EPDR values are 1.9 ohms at 25Hz and 2.75 ohms at 52Hz. as music rarely has high energy at these frequencies"

Unless you listen to music with double bass, organ, lowest grand piano notes.

Yes this "could work well with tube or SS amps that have high damping factor/low local feedback/high output impedance designs would help give some less damped "bass lift" to the sound.

But with high feedback solid state or Class-D (with low damping factor/low output impedance) they 'could" sound light and too tight down there "looking at those measurement's"

But hey, I'd rather a tight over damped speaker design than a under damped one, as an over damped one is quite a bit easier to tune into the room either with positioning (closer to the wall/corner) or if you don't wan to do that, with a low value power resistor (eg: 1 or 2 ohm) in series with with the speaker terminal to make output impedance of the ss or class-d amp seem slightly higher and less controlled like the tube to the speaker and sound less overdamped.
Cheers George

DaveinSM's picture

Look at the FR graphs. In addition to the huge hump at 30Hz, looks like there’s a bump at around 150hz and a corresponding dip at around d200Hz, but that’s in room response.

But if you look at the anechoic response curves, that 150-200Hz anomaly is gone. That is also the range where the woofers apparently cross over to the midrange, so maybe there is something in his room that accentuates that crossover area to negative effect.

zipzimzap's picture

that makes sense

Beefdick Malone's picture

Every time a reviewer gives an "Andrew Jones" speaker a good review; an angel gets its wings...

No actually, what happens is that dumb audiophools blow their wad.

X