Philharmonic Audio BMR Monitor loudspeaker

Let's get this out of the way: The BMR Monitor may be a monitor, but it isn't a bookshelf or desktop speaker any more than a yacht is a dinghy. Heave a slick-surfaced, 32lb BMR from its shipping carton, then wrap your arms around its svelte figure, with its fancy array of drivers and rich-colored piano-lacquer finish, and you'll understand this speaker deserves better than to be tucked away amid books or flanking a computer screen.

I was so enamored by the look of the BMR Monitor, I initially thought its name didn't do it justice. It sounded too nondescript. But with time and growing familiarity, I came to find the BMR moniker fitting—dare I say sleekly masculine sounding, like a phonetic cross between "Bimmer" and a wolf growl. The BMR Monitor—there's also a BMR Tower—is so named for its midrange driver—a Balanced Mode Radiator. We don't come across many of these in our hobby, but it's not new: The technology was invented in 1925.

The BMR driver is not typically used in the way it's used in the BMR Monitor: as a midrange unit. As Philharmonic Audio Chief of Operations Ken Lin explained during a Zoom chat, "The BMR driver is normally used full range in small desktop and surround applications, and occasionally in larger two-way designs, where it crosses to a conventional woofer. To the best of our knowledge, Philharmonic Audio is the only company using the BMR driver as a dedicated midrange in a three-way."

The BMR Monitor has gone through a couple of changes since its inception. "This is version 2.5, I think," said Ken. When I saw an online image of a BMR Monitor as I awaited its arrival, its face looked vaguely familiar, although I was sure I'd never seen it in person. My best guess, even today, was that I came across it on defunct speaker company Salk Sound's website, where it was being sold on behalf of Philharmonic Audio, then later as part of the Salk Sound product line. What's the connection? Philharmonic Audio's founder and chief designer, Dennis Murphy, built the crossovers used in Salk Sound speakers. Dennis named his company after the Washington Metropolitan Philharmonic Orchestra, for which he plays the viola.

While Ken only recently became part of Philharmonic Audio, he and Dennis enjoyed a prior business relationship. Ken's company, Alexis Sonus, supplied Philharmonic Audio with the cabinets and crossover for the BMR Monitor and sold the BMR Monitor to the Taiwanese market, where sales of the speaker greatly outnumbered those in the US.

In 2020, after a stint in hospital, Dennis announced he intended to close Philharmonic Audio. Ken intervened. "I told Dennis, there might be an opportunity to continue serving BMR fans," Ken said. "I proposed that I would take over the operations, including cabinet design, and he would do the crossover design and handle customer inquiries." Ken became co-founder of what he refers to as Philharmonic Audio 2.0. "This is when we started to offer high-end finish options on the BMRs," Ken told me. "We also grew the company product line from one product to six speakers and two accessories."

In 2024, under Ken's direction, another important change happened at the new Philharmonic Audio: The company website was configured to handle ecommerce. Said Ken, "Before, customers couldn't directly purchase through our website. They had to send an email, and Dennis gave them an invoice to pay. But since the product-line expansion, we can no longer keep up with customer demand by manually generating invoices."

A key aim for Ken has been "to bring stability and sustainability into the business." One way of doing that was to promote the BMR Monitor to the North American market, which is the reason these speakers have, as I write these words, taken pride of place in my listening room. I don't say "pride of place" off-handedly. They've assumed their position on my stands with visual distinction, projecting a more dignified posture than that of your average monitor. The speaker comes in four finishes and two shapes—rectangular or curved—the latter adding $200 to the speaker's base price of $1800/pair. The model I received was the Curved Piano Ebony version, constructed of 12 layers of thin MDF bent and laminated, then finished with a "premium" ebony wood veneer. My pair looked "premium." Ken: "It's very hard to find that kind of quality of finish in the consumer market without paying many thousands of dollars."

The BMR's polished back panel looked sparse, just three things on it, spaced wide apart: a silver name/specifications badge, a flared port, and a single pair of binding posts. Or is that four things?

In a confusing bit of branding, a plaque at the bottom of the speakers' baffle was inscribed only with the name Alexis Sonus, while a badge on the back panel listed Philharmonic Audio and Alexis (no Sonus). Ken explained that both names appear due to the BMR Monitor being a joint venture between his and Dennis's companies, but that officially the speaker is sold in North America under Philharmonic Audio.

When I asked Ken what prompted the choice of such an unusual combination of charismatic-looking driver technologies—a RAAL ribbon tweeter, a BMR midrange, a ceramic-cone woofer—he said the decision came down to finding the most synergetic drivers for a wide-dispersion design.

"Being a true ribbon tweeter, the RAAL's dispersion pattern is 180°," Ken said. "When you move, say, 30° or 60° degrees off-axis, the tweeter's response won't drop that much. But using a wide dispersion tweeter creates the challenge of finding a midrange or lower-frequency driver that can provide a seamless transition with the tweeter.

"A tweeter is responsible for frequencies above about 3.5kHz," he continued. "If the transition is not smooth—if your midrange or woofer cannot mesh with the tweeter's wide dispersion—you might have perfect on-axis frequency response but when you move 30°, there's a hole in the crossover region."

When I asked if it might not have been easier to try to mesh two drivers together rather than three, Ken replied, "In a two-way, it's very difficult to find a tweeter that crosses at 1.2kHz and is still wide dispersion and able to handle all that power. It's also difficult for a woofer in a two-way to have that level of dispersion. When a woofer goes up the frequency range, it starts to beam.

"It's why we preferred a three-way," Ken said. "And we thought that if we could find a midrange that could mesh with this wonderful ribbon tweeter, we could have a speaker with perfect wide-dispersion capability across a wide part of the frequency range, and that doesn't really exist in the market right now."

When I told Ken I didn't think I'd ever heard a BMR driver before, he said, "If you've been in an airport, you probably have. When you hear passengers being called over the intercom, it's usually over a BMR driver, because it's wide dispersion, and its diaphragm is flat against the wall."

With technical assistance from Dennis, Ken explained that the BMR is a "flat-cone driver with rear weights that control breakup modes and shift the cone movement from pistonic to a bending motion in the lower treble, a combination that matches the broad horizontal directivity of the RAAL ribbon tweeter without the need for a tweeter waveguide." The BMR's diaphragm transmits music through its vibrating motion, which changes depending on frequencies. The BMR is equivalent to a "bending-mode" driver at high frequencies while remaining pistonic at low frequencies. The BMR driver has its own dedicated chamber. It's "filled with materials to absorb the back waves," Ken said.

At the bottom of the line, literally, is the BMR's SB Acoustics 6" woofer with its ceramic-covered cone, said to deliver bass extension to 34Hz, which Ken emphasized was "a real 34Hz."

That's impressive for a passive standmount. How do they do it? "The bass response is the handiwork of Paul Kittinger, who is an expert in bass tuning. He works with software that allows him not only to optimize the cabinet volume and port dimensions but also to optimize the position of the woofer and port on the cabinet. Paul does all of our box tuning, including the transmission line designs for our larger speaker."

When the subject of where the speaker is made came up, Ken replied, "From across the world. It's hand-assembled in the US, but we source components from China, Serbia, Indonesia, and Taiwan. When you buy our speaker, you're supporting the GDP of five countries."

The BMR's sensitivity is rated at 86.5dB/2.83V/m, a figure Ken said was conservative; he puts it closer to 88, 89dB; we'll see what JA's measurements show. As for the speaker's lowish 4 ohm impedance, Ken said it's very linear and smooth and shouldn't present a difficult load to the amplifier. He suggested a minimum power requirement of between 40 to 60Wpc, adding, "we know people who use 300B amps with it and are happy, so it really depends on how far your listening distance is and how loud you play your music."

Regarding speaker placement, Ken recommends a minimum of 7" from a wall, but "the farther you can put it from the wall, the farther the soundstage will be. We don't recommend toe-in, although some people prefer it. Because of the wide dispersion, ... we don't think you need it."

Setup and listening
Turns out I did need toe-in. Setting up the BMRs wasn't as "set and forget" as I anticipated based on its wide-dispersion design.

Using a couple of familiar recordings—of music—to guide me through setup, I listened to the BMRs first on 24.5" stands and then on 28" stands. I preferred the latter for their higher soundstage. This brought the height of the BMRs' tweeters close to those on my Focal standmounts and the Dynaudio Contour 30i's I recently reviewed, as a result of which not the tweeters but the woofers were positioned at ear level. Abiding by the general rule for a wide-dispersion design, I positioned them facing straight ahead, royal guard–like. My listening position formed a near-equilateral triangle. After a bit of fiddling with speaker distance here and there, I declared myself done. I had a tall soundstage, solid center fill, and focused, palpable images.

COMPANY INFO
Philharmonic Audio
1461 Carrington Ridge Ln.
Vienna
VA 22182
info@philharmonicaudio.com
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
georgehifi's picture

"Its current-hungry impedance will require careful amplifier matching.—John Atkinson"

I thought so too, and when I looked at what the reviewer used to review it.
https://www.stereophile.com/content/grandinote-shinai-integrated-amplifi...

I thought WT? how can a conclusion of what they remotely sounded like when being driven by that gonad-less amp??
Cheers George

rschryer's picture

...doesn't sound as wimpy as you may think, but in my rather small listening area in the basement I also don't listen to music at loud levels — just average ones, i.e. loud enough so my family in the living room upstairs can make out the melodies. The amp did seem to lose steam, however, when I tried to raise the volume too much, causing the music to lose some of its sense of ease and focus. Before that, I was in magic land.

georgehifi's picture

"doesn't sound as wimpy as you may think"

At 30w into 8ohms and with "no negative feedback" to keep nasty loads under control into a 86db speaker, it's got nothing to be proud of between it's legs driving into these quite nasty loads that these speakers are showing to it.
I think these speakers are "maybe" a killer speaker and something to hear at this price, but driven by an amp with "current" and some "wattage" that can do them justice.

"JA: The minimum EPDR values were 2.63 ohms at 43Hz, 1.25 ohms between 93Hz and 107Hz, and 1.5 ohms between 1.5kHz and 1.6kHz. The BMR Monitor is a very demanding load for the partnering amplifier."

Cheers George

Anton's picture

I usually listen at around 85 dB...that's the beginning of subjectively "loud" for me.

30 watts is likely ample. For a small room.

rschryer's picture

It was, unless I wanted to crank up the volume. While I never felt, during my audition, that the volume was too low by my usual listening standards, I also wasn't listening to Spinal Tap at 11. In practical terms, I would suggest driving these speakers with at least 50Wpc, as long as you're not a headbanger or someone who loves to air-conduct to Wagner at concert level decibels. (Besides, I don't see the BMRs as a headbanger speaker—it's too refined for that.) Volume aside, the match between the Shinai and BMRs produced great sound.

Maybe the question to a prospective purchase should be: "How do you intend on using the BMRs, and in what kind of listening environment?" The answer to that will help determine the number of watts needed.

remlab's picture

Amazing performance in the midrange frequencies. A lot of high end companies probably don't use them because of how crazy inexpensive they are, but that's their loss. Performance is performance.
https://hificompass.com/en/speakers/measurements/tectonic/tectonic-tebm46c20n-4b

georgehifi's picture

"Amazing performance in the midrange frequencies."

Nice, 89dB also, looks like they had to it bring back 3dB to mate up with the bass or ribbon driver and from what I saw well under $50us each.
https://tinyurl.com/29qj6p37
Cheers George

The Tinkerer's picture

The BMR's (gen 1 and gen 2) are a really crushing load to drive from my personal experience with them. Most users end up in Class-D land with half a kilowatt behind them. I would never attempt to drive them with a tube amp, personally. Have several friends that own the BMR gen 1 and gen 2. The first gen BMR fancy cabs were actually made by Jim Salk, who offered them to Dennis for less than his own cost. No idea how much this contributed to the end of Salk Sound. Maybe not at all. Jim is a good guy.

I have found across 2 different friends' setups that I would deem "serious" that these are on-par with the better Revel stand monitors like the M126Be. Driven by an ATI 4002 in one case and some VTV 2000w (?) ICE amps. Both ran quite a bit warmer than I expected (the owners stated they were both safe). However, the BMR's lacked the imaging specificity and sound stage depth that even the current Graham-Chartwell LS3/5A's and Falcon Acoustics Gold Badge LS3/5A's offer in spades. Crossovers in these are Bennic dealies and are roughly entry-tier Revel quality. Not on par with higher-end brands, from what I saw; basic Bennic MKP caps, cement boat resistors, thin traces, etc. I think some Mundorf upgrades could bring out some appreciable benefits.

I admire RS's ears and his reviews, but I fear that he may have glossed over the truly demanding load that these speakers present to an amp. It rules out basically every tube amp in my experience.... and a large cohort of solid state. Still, it's nice to see some little guys get attention.

Ortofan's picture

... a tap on the output transformer for a 2Ω load.

The Tinkerer's picture

That might do it. But no SET's allowed. Also phase angles like that need a good amount of NFB.

avanti1960's picture

the midrange of these monitors sound (to my ears) much clearer and more pleasing than that of the Dynaudio Contour.
Can't think of a speaker near the BMR's price that has such low levels of cabinet excitation.

avanti1960's picture

to the author. it's a matter of preference that i liked the BMRs midrange better but agree that the dynaudios midrange has more texture, i can hear that now. the BMRs midrange has a definite focus to it.

rschryer's picture

...but thank you.

And I think you nailed it with "...dynaudios midrange has more texture... the BMRs midrange has a definite focus to it."

directdriver's picture

To take advantage of their good measurements and not so crazy price, maybe get two pairs in symmetrical totem pole arrangement to connect them in series to double their impedance so it's easier load for tube amps? I think driving them from the tube amp's 4 ohm tap should work?

georgehifi's picture

'maybe get two pairs connect them in series to double their impedance so it's easier load"

Then the 30w amp he used will have nothing in the way of wattage (volts) to drive them.

Cheers George

call me Artie's picture

In broad terms, I think the numbers go like this:

Two speakers in parallel => half the single impedance, double the total current draw, double the SPL compared to a single speaker.
Two speakers in series => double the single impedance, half the total current draw, half the SPL from each speaker but same overall SPL because times two speakers.

Should work OK provided you know what you are expecting.

call me Artie's picture

I'm not considering above any factors like radiation, lobing etc. Just the general rule of thumb for combining loads

Bagwell368's picture

I use a Schiit Ragnarok 2 - about 100 wpc@4 ohms on my BMR's. My room is 16x13x9. I have no issues with getting 100 db peaks, but since they BMR's have such excellent low volume intelligibility I usually listen in the mid 70's-80 db. The Ragnarok 2 will not drive the Maggie 1.7i, so the load that the BMR presents seems fine for an integrated only rated to 4 ohms.

SET Man's picture

Hey!

Today's music sucks? Well, mostly but not all.

Don't know how old are you but I'm 47 and I'm listening to some new musics by artists in their late teens and early 20s. There are young artists out there doing all kind of music genres and some with new sound of their own today.

But of course... music is a very personal thing, so what's music to you is just a bunch of noise to some.

X