Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
I was very impressed when I heard the original in 1987, and boy was it hot to the touch. Also, nice to see they included the same amount of RCA inputs as the original. Would love to hear this against my separates.
After it first appeared in 1985, the A1 quickly became famous for its hot top plate. The top plate got as hot as it did because it was used as a heatsink for the output transistors, which were biased highly into class-A. The A1's hot top made tabloid headlines, but for me it was its bold, sinewy, un-transistory sound and timeless, sharply drawn styling that distinguished it from cooler running Brit-fi competitors such as Audiolab's 8000A, Creek's 4040, A&R Cambridge's A60, and NAD's 3020.
Despite the Daily Mirror headlines, it was the A1's all-natural sonicsnot its top-plate temperaturethat made it an instant classic.
Now it's back, priced at $1779, looking and feeling cooler than before.
As I type this, it is 85°F in my room, and I just held my palm 1" from the A1's chassis-top heatsink and could barely feel heat rising upmaybe none at all. Using a digital oven thermometer, I measured the chassis-top temperature at 140.1°F (60°C): too warm for toddler fingers but 5° cooler than the original's design-specified heatsink temperature of 65°Celsius.
History
My introduction to Musical Fidelity's tuneful aesthetic began in the late 1970s, when Anthony Michaelson ran a company called Michaelson & Austin, which was selling EL34 tube amplifiers designed by the first audio designer I christened a "Tall Wizard," my soon-to-be friend and Triode Mafia brother Tim de Paravicini. Tim's design for the TVA-10 was a testament to our shared belief that in any properly designed audio amplifier, tubes and transistors sound alike. I believe Tim's design for Musical Fidelity's A1 proved that point.
When Musical Fidelity founder Anthony Michaelson retired in 2018, he sold the brand and its intellectual property to Austria-based Heinz Lichtenegger of Pro-Ject and its parent company, Audio Tuning. The relationship between Musical Fidelity and Audio Turning goes back decades.
Description
I asked PR wonderperson Wendy Knowles (who arranged this review) if someone could verify that the A1 I'm reviewing bears more than a cosmetic resemblance to the Tim de Paravicinidesigned original. She asked Heinz, who replied, "Simon Quarry, our designer, 100% respected Tim's design, only changing components to enhance reliability."
To that end, Musical Fidelity's new A1 puts Tim's original circuits in a wider, thicker chassis, with more heatsink area, a bigger transformer and power supply, better circuit boards, more capacitance, closer tolerance, parts rated for higher temperature, beefier binding posts, more ventilation holes on the sides, and more line-level inputs (5). Plus, Tape Out (fixed) and Pre Out (variable). All RCA. No balanced inputs or outputs. The chassis measures 17.3" wide, 2.7" high, and 11.1" deep. The A1's output stage is class-AB, rated to deliver 25 pure class-A watts into 8 ohms. Its maximum voltage is specified as 42.5V peakpeak. The damping factor is specified as 150, which suggests an output impedance of about 0.05 ohms. The specified RIAA response accuracy is specified as ±1dB.
The A1's blue-lettered, timelessly styled, touch screenfree front panel pleased me more each time I looked at it. The volume control dial felt solidly anchored and durable as it twisted the shaft of an ALPS RK Series remote-powered volume control. Speaking of remote: The remote controlnone was provided with the original A1is a 4" long, solid aluminum thing with three rectangular, rubber-covered buttons: Vol+, Vol, and Mute. Like the A1 itself, it looks timeless.
Between the Volume dial and the selector dial"Phono," "CD," "Tuner," "Tape," "Aux 1," "Aux 2"lies an unlit Normal/Direct button that also was not on the original. "With this switch, you can totally bypass the gain block before the volume control," Musical Fidelity says, "resulting in roughly 10dB less gain. This feature proves particularly advantageous when working with modern or high-output digital sources, enabling fine tuning the range of your volume potentiometer and accommodating sensitive loudspeakers."
According to Musical Fidelity's website, "The new A1 has received an updated transformer from shared (in 1985 original) to a more efficient dual-mono [transformer] with split rail windings, resulting in amp stages that are supplied by fully independent left and right power supplies. Each amplifier now has double the original's supply capacity resulting in reduced ripple and noise." Elsewhere, it says, "The A1 employs a discrete current-mode input stage for lowest noise with MC and MM cartridges. A low-noise current-to-voltage conversion stage is used for further amplification and RIAA equalization. Automatic input impedance matching for the selected MC input, along with increased gain, increases the versatility of the A1's phono stage." According to the owner's manual, the moving coil phono input is best suited for cartridges outputting no less than 100µV and no more than 800µV.
I asked Heinz what that current-to-voltage stuff means. "The first stage MM and MC cartridges see is a voltage-to-current converter, which also acts as an amplifier," he responded. "Afterwards, as described on our website, a low-noise current-to-voltage conversion stage is used for further amplification and RIAA equalization.
"In total, a significant bulk of the amplification is done" in current mode. That means lower noise than if pure voltage amplification was used throughout. "This is our very unique design that brings a lot of sonic advantages." One result of this approach is to effectively load the MM circuit with about 50k ohms of resistance, Heinz said.
"Then, for the MC stage, we switch the transistor's emitter resistor to a lower one! It is important to know that the amplification factor on the discrete input stage is dependent on a transistor's emitter resistor! So by switching that resistor, we increase the gain in MC mode (to 60dB) while subsequently also automatically reducing the input resistance to match MC cartridges. This is a very different approach compared to typical MC stages. It works out to just about 1k ohm input resistance. "Doing it this way gets us the benefits of a very clean and tidy MC Phono Stage design, plus all the current-mode benefits."
Playing records
I could have written this review after playing just one record: Festivals of the Himalayas (Nonesuch Explorer Series LP H-72065), which was recorded on site by David Lewiston, produced by Teresa Sterne, and mastered by Robert Ludwig at Sterling Sound. I dropped the needle, and my speakers lit up like a movie screen. The room came alive with sound.
Listening with Nagaoka's MP-200 moving Permalloy cartridge into the MF A1's MM phono input, I found myself grinning at the volume and extensive detail of the projected soundspace. It was like viewing a real place through a wide-angle lens.
In single-mike field recordings made by professionals, where the performance is unedited and the tape is unprocessed, the sheer dimensionality of the reproduction can be transporting. Through the A1's MM phono stage, the three-dimensional space of the Himalayan festival appeared as an infinitely large dome, with drums and noisemakers, singing, and diverse humanity, coming in from all directions. I could hear from the ground to the sky and sense something like a horizon or perimeter where the microphones ran out of sensitivity. Tone and texture were super vivid, supporting the illusion of being there in the midst of a crowd, in an Indian village.
I have owned, repaired, or reviewed legions of integrated amplifiers, including some very expensive ones, but none with a moving magnet phono stage that impressed me more than the A1's did as it amplified the output of the Nagaoka MP-200.
I tested the A1's MC input with Dynavector's XX2 moving coil cartridge. Its 0.28mV (280µV) output and 6 ohm internal impedance seemed like it might match up well with the A1's "self-adjusting" MC input. I know and love this cartridge; I've used it with every kind of SUT (including Dynavector's own SUP-200), with JFET headamps, and with a range of transimpedance step-ups including Sutherland Engineering's SUTZ and Little Loco and Hagerman Audio Labs' Piccolo Zero. Through the A1's MC input, the XX2 sounded as quick-afoot as it always does when it is happy with the load it is seeing. Transparency was reduced relative to Sutherland's SUTZ transimpedance headamp, but through the A1 the XX2 sounded bolder and bass-punchier than it did with SUTZ.
I tested how Tim's unusual MC input would handle the 40 ohm Denon DL-103 MC cartridge. I found that it played churchlike, but not hallelujah level. Voices and instruments were nowhere near as clear and certain as they were with my current favorite Hana MC, the Umami Blue. So I tried the Umami Blue.
With the A1, the Umami Blue's 0.4mV output and 8 ohm internal impedance imparted a crisp, gain-is-just-right vibe to every disc I tried. The A1's MC input really lit up and clicked with the Umami Blue.
Musical Fidelity's A1 never sounded more exquisitely detailed or transparent than it did playing "Moonchild" from King Crimson's In the Court of the Crimson King (Atlantic LP SD 19155). I'm sure most of you know this record; I wish you could have heard how tone perfect and Windex clear this track sounded coming from my Falcon speakers. Again, the soundspace was enormous, the presentation bold and highly visual. I began to sense a pattern.
I was very impressed when I heard the original in 1987, and boy was it hot to the touch. Also, nice to see they included the same amount of RCA inputs as the original. Would love to hear this against my separates.
That used this as his preamp connected to a Carver cube amp in the 80's. I was more interested in the Magneplanar 1b's but the sound was my first introduction into stereophiledom.
Good stuff, but I know I wasn't hearing the full treatment this amp could provide. I did hear the Forte class A 50-watter that week as well. That was not easy to forget. Linn Kan speakers also; really dug that with 'In the Air Tonight' at a dealer demo.
Stereophile followed literally thereafter. First issue was King Kong cover April 1985? (RC issue) Hard for me to remember without digging up the dog-eared copy buried somewhere.
When I think of that issue, my Monster Cable Alpha Genesis 2 phono cart and Counterpoint SA-5 and SA-12 pre/amp combo came to mind instantly. I wish there were more hybrid tube / SS designs like that, but to fully modern standards. There are a few, I'm sure.
Thanks Herb, for always doing something unique...
Thanks, Herb.
Back in the later half of the 80s, I enjoyed the original A1 a lot. With a Systemdek IIX/Helius Aurum/Goldring 1040 and a pair of Opus 3 Chaconne II it performed beautifully. Really. Over time, it did have some operational issues, though.
I have no experience with the new version, but I do recognize what you say about the A1 engaging both the left and the right hemisphere. And this reminds me of something Brian Eno says in the recent documentary film, "Eno" (I'm paraphrasing from memory):
"A big mistake, we make, is to view things and ideas as being either this or that. It rarely is so; most often it's a continuum with an almost infinite number of points. The next mistake, we make, is to say: And it's this point right there."
To me, really good hi-fi - perhaps more defining than any other quality - has a facility to surf a spectrum of distinction and synthesis, and quite fluently distinguish and/or connect, in a balance of the moment. Like real music plays.
In general, I agree as well with your thoughts on a need for greater inclusion of right brain accentuations in audiophilia*, in listening and in gear.
Thanks again.
*https://www.stereophile.com/content/gramophone-dreams-85-let-right-brain-hagerman-audio-labs-piccolo-zero-head-amp
Herb could write a detailed review about something as nondescript as the kitchen sink - and somehow still make it an engrossing read .
Icon from my youth, like indeed the ones form Audiolab, Creek, Cambridge, Mission, Cyrus, Naim or Linn. i have read several international reviews about this (re)new(ed) amplifier, including from the very chauvinistic press in the UK, and there nobody was really impressed by this amplifier, sound 4 out of 5, build 4 out of 5 and features 3 out of 5. So yes, nice to have and to look at from a nostalgia point of view (like the retro look ones from Naim, Cyrus or Mission), but for the sound there are better alternatives in this price range. Or below, what about the Rega Brio.
It did get mixed reviews because it wasnt as good as some of the others. Plus the nickname Musical F@t@lity was earned. The industrial design was by Pentagram. Probably Kenneth Grange who did work for B%W
With the 1st A100 I always had a burning desire to wipe feet on them, worst design heat sink ever, horizontal tiny height fins/flat plate, no tunnel heat convection, no wonder they all buckled up at the edges.
They were just a 20w class-a power amp with passive volume control, source selector and high gain phono opamp.
Cheers George
... the sound quality of a phono stage that is based upon a pair of (50-year-old) TL072 IC op-amps.
Archaic at best, 1978 37 year old maybe even earlier opamp!!!!!
https://sound-au.com/articles/opamp-history.htm#s37
Cheers George
proudly manufacturing amplifiers utilizing the Western Electric 300B tube which is now 86 years old. And if it isn't a 300B it s an EL 34 or 6550 both of which are over 60 yrs old. In other words, your point was meaningless.
The API 2520 op-amp, around since the 70's and heavily based on the earlier Melcor 1731 op-amp, has been making hit records for 50+ years. It's in every API console, EQ, mic-pre, and compressor they make. You're listening to that op-amp on at *least* 50% of the non-classical recordings made from the mid-70's to now and liking it.
If you measurements are everything guys only knew what goes on in recording studios and that distortion is *intentionally* added to pretty much everything except classical (not dither, actual 2nd and 3rd harmonic distortion to mimic tubes and tape), and run through multiple transformers for their specific distortion characteristics you'd freak out.
120 dB S/N is literally meaningless when even the cleanest stereo mic'd classical music has a S/N less than 80 dB - between the mic's self noise and the HVAC you're looking at maybe 75ish dB S/N, depending on how quiet the HVAC is. Live hall? Forget about it, that's gonna be noisy. This fact alone is why I have nothing but disdain for ASR and its slavish SINAD fanboys. It's a cult of personality, and sad. Listening to gear instead of music is a thing I guess, but not mine - it was by far the least pleasant thing for me about reviewing gear.
<60s research reveals: hifinews (see link below) had the following Conclusions to offer:
"..Musical Fidelity has done an excellent job. .. Regardless of the nostalgia aspect, this is a fine performer that should give more contemporary rivals in its price class a real run for their money."
Sounds like some were impressed.
let ms. knowles write the review already.
No reviews for $10,000 wires? You guys are disappointing me.
I own several int amps from late 70s and early 80s. All Japanese. A few cap upgrade mods but nothing spectacular. Gotta say that even the midline "rack" system gear from non-audio brands like Sanyo and Hitachi sound pretty darn good.
Bottom line...check ebay and thrift stores for stuff first. Change of pace and those vintage styles never lose asthetics.
Very Poor power drive and value at Almost 2K in cost , doubt this Integrated can compete with all the current Class D and other offerings out there in the market today..
Pass ...!
This amp sounds WAY better driving my Cornwall IVs compared to the much beefier, bolder, bigger, 3x as expensive Yamaha 3200 I also have.
The A1 is such a joy with high sensitivity speakers - a real rocker.