Esoteric Grandioso M1X monoblock power amplifier Measurements

Sidebar 3: Measurements

Before I tested one of the Esoteric M1X amplifiers, serial number 20014, with my Audio Precision SYS2722, I preconditioned the amplifier, following the CEA's recommendation of operating it at one-eighth the specified power into 8 ohms for 30 minutes. At the end of that time, the internal heatsinks were fairly warm, at 105.7°F (40.8°C), though the top panel's temperature was just 82.6°F (28.1°C). As JVS had told me that the M1X's sound quality improved after a lengthy break-in, I then ran the amplifier at one-third the specified power into 8 ohms for another 30 minutes before examining its measured performance. The heatsink and top panel temperatures had increased only slightly after this period, to107.4°F (41.9°C) and 83.4°F (28.5°C), respectively.

The Esoteric's voltage gain is specified as 28.5dB; I measured 28.13dB into 8 ohms for the balanced input, 28.27dB for the unbalanced input. The M1X preserved absolute polarity (ie, was noninverting) with both input types. The specified input impedances are 100k ohms, balanced, and 10k ohms, unbalanced. I measured an even higher 180k ohms at 20Hz and 1kHz for the balanced input, dropping slightly to a still very high 146k ohms at 20kHz. The unbalanced input was 9.8k ohms at low and midrange frequencies, dropping to 9.2k ohms at the top of the audioband.


Fig.1 Esoteric M1X, frequency response at 2.83V into: simulated loudspeaker load (gray), 8 ohms (blue), 4 ohms (magenta), 2 ohms (red) (0.5dB/vertical div.).


Fig.2 Esoteric M1X, small-signal 10kHz squarewave into 8 ohms.

The Esoteric's output impedance was a low 0.24 ohm at 20Hz and 1kHz, increasing slightly to 0.265 ohm at 20kHz. (These figures include the series impedance of 6' of spaced-pair loudspeaker cable.) The modulation of the amplifier's frequency response due to the Ohm's law interaction between this source impedance and the impedance of our standard simulated loudspeaker was very small, at ±0.1dB (fig.1, gray trace). The response into an 8 ohm resistive load (fig.1, blue trace) was down by 3dB just above 100kHz, though the increasing output impedance at very high frequencies means that the ultrasonic rolloff into 4 ohms (magenta) and 2 ohms (red) was greater. The M1X's reproduction of a 10kHz squarewave into 8 ohms (fig.2) was superb, with no overshoot or ringing.


Fig.3 Esoteric M1X, spectrum of 1kHz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 1W into 8 ohms (linear frequency scale).

Measured with the unbalanced input shorted to ground, the amplifier's unweighted, wideband signal/noise ratio was a very good 77.4dB ref. 1W into 8 ohms. This ratio improved to 85dB when the measurement bandwidth was restricted to 22Hz–22kHz and to 87.7dB when A-weighted. While spuriae at the even-order harmonics of the 60Hz power-supply frequency were present in the Esoteric's noisefloor (fig.3), these are negligible, at –100dB and below ref. 1W into 8 ohms. I repeated this spectral analysis with a wire connecting the grounding terminal on the amplifier's back panel to the Audio Precision's chassis ground, but there was no difference in the levels of the power supply–related spuriae.


Fig.4 Esoteric M1X, distortion (%) vs 1kHz continuous output power into 8 ohms.


Fig.5 Esoteric M1X, distortion (%) vs 1kHz continuous output power into 4 ohms.

The Esoteric M1X exceeded its specified output powers of 300W into 8 ohms and 600W into 4 ohms (both powers equivalent to 24.8dBW). With our definition of clipping, which is when the output's percentage of THD+noise reaches 1%, the M1X clipped with a 1kHz signal at 340W into 8 ohms (25.3dBW, fig.4) and at 620W into 4 ohms (24.9dBW, fig.5). Although the Esoteric amplifier's maximum power into 2 ohms isn't specified, I measured 1050W into this load at 1% THD+N. The wall voltage had dropped from 120.2V to 116V at this power.


Fig.6 Esoteric M1X, THD+N (%) vs frequency at 20V into: 8 ohms (blue), 4 ohms (magenta), 2 ohms (red).

Figs.4 and 5 indicate that distortion was very low below actual waveform clipping. I examined how the percentage of THD+N changed with frequency at 20V, which is equivalent to 50W into 8 ohms, 100W into 4 ohms, and 200W into 2 ohms. The distortion was extremely low in the midrange into 8 ohms (fig.6, blue trace) but rose in the top octaves, and it was higher into 4 ohms (magenta) and 2 ohms (red). However, even at this very high power into 2 ohms, the THD+N remained well below 0.1%.


Fig.7 Esoteric M1X, 1kHz waveform at 50W into 8 ohms, 0.051% THD+N (top); distortion and noise waveform with fundamental notched out (bottom, not to scale).


Fig.8 Esoteric M1X, spectrum of 50Hz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 50W into 8 ohms (linear frequency scale).

The Esoteric's distortion driving 1kHz at 50W into 8 ohms was predominantly the third harmonic (fig.7), lying at –66dB (0.05%, fig.8). Though higher-order, predominantly odd-order harmonics are present in this graph, these are all low in level. The third harmonic rose almost to –60dB (0.1%) at the same voltage into 4 ohms (not shown).


Fig.9 Esoteric M1X, HF intermodulation spectrum, DC–24kHz, 19+20kHz at 50W peak into 8 ohms (linear frequency scale).

When the M1X drove an equal mix of 19 and 20kHz tones with a peak level of 50W into 8 ohms (fig.9), the second-order difference product at 1kHz lay at a very low –94dB (0.002%). Higher-order intermodulation products lay at the same level or lower. At the same voltage into 4 ohms, the intermodulation products rose by 3dB.

The Esoteric M1X did well on the test bench, offering very high power with low distortion and noise.—John Atkinson

COMPANY INFO
Esoteric Company
1-47 Ochiai, Tama-shi
Tokyo 206-8530
Japan
(042) 356-9100
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
Dennis in NJ's picture

With all the technology and engineering devoted to the Grandioso M1X, it is a shame it takes days to warm-up and sound its best. I would have hoped there was a solution to overcome this, and bring warm-up/opening-up time into the realm of hours. Maybe something like the "high bias" option of some Parasound amps. Perhaps this is not possible; but having to wait days for the sound to open-up is a deal breaker for me. Plus in these "green" days, it is objectionable to have to leave a 400 watt draw on all the time for peak performance! Maybe some clever solution can be devised by Esoteric as an upgrade.

Gregory68's picture

I just can’t see myself being that eccentric to have a listening room with the music always playing just so it was at its best. Turning up the bias seems like the option or perhaps some heaters to bring the amp up to operating temperature. Otherwise I really enjoyed the read.

Gregory68's picture

I just can’t see myself being that eccentric to have a listening room with the music always playing just so it was at its best. Turning up the bias seems like the option or perhaps some heaters to bring the amp up to operating temperature. Otherwise I really enjoyed the read.

Siegfried's picture

[Post removed due to offense content unrelated to hi-fi.]

georgehifi's picture

Nobody, if you can spend that on them, the electricity to run them is nothing to that person.

Cheers George

Scott From PT's picture

What would it be like to imagine that all humans deserve kindness and decency, even public figures, or those who love in ways that we don't totally understand?

Thank you to everyone here who posts in kindness, and my sincere compassion for those who can't enjoy a simple equipment view without viewing it through their own personal pain and fear.

Jim Austin's picture

Jim Austin, Editor
Stereophile

georgehifi's picture

Good BJT (bi-polar) amps "can't beat them" (Gryphon, Agostino etc etc)
Looking at the measurements particularly output impedance of an ordinary .26ohm (30 damping factor), indicates to me it could use very little global or only local feedback.
And that it can almost keep doubling it's wattage down to 2ohms,("2.4kW into 1 ohm.")!!!! it's got bags of current, and to get these kinds of other measurements with such low global or just local feedback is quite an achievement.
Should be a stunner to listen to.

Cheers George

Amblygona's picture

You'll need to moderate that post.

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

The alert has been sounded. How do you spell "toast?"

jason

ok's picture

..craves for a follow-up.

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

????

johnnythunder1's picture

at Stereophile. Besides your beautifully written and insightful reviews (and I always come away musically enlightened as well) I'm always impressed about how much work you have to put into the set up etc. and the A/B-ing with these mega components that always seem to be assigned to you. It's obviously a labor of love and we are supremely grateful for the mental- and physical - effort you put into these reviews.

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

Greatly appreciated.

jason

AnalogueFan's picture

This is very scary. This would be the first natural sounding amp, because the other amps altered the linearity of the frequency response in the 112Hz zone.
Those others are us, who can only hear our music, analog or digital, through altered amplifiers.
The only truth would be in Japan with the discovery of Esoteric.
What a revelation!

X