Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
This is the only time a butt upstages a piece of equipment. It appears Melody Gardot has put in some gym time on the stair master
Putting Soulution's best to the test
Depending on how high on your rack you wish to place the 727, you may need assistance hoisting its 62lb into place. Although it comes with its own specially designed feet, I placed Wilson Audio Pedestals beneath it because (a) I use them under my reference preamp and other components, and (b) listening confirmed that they contributed a bit more air and depth to the sonic presentation. Depending on the sonic isolation and sound of your rackfew supports have no sound of their ownyour results may differ.
During the review, I auditioned the 727 with both Accuphase A-300 and Dan D'Agostino M400 MxV monoblock amplifiers. Other components included an Innuos Statement Next-Gen music server with PhoenixNET switch, a dCS Vivaldi Apex DAC/Upsampler Plus/Master Clock, and Wilson Alexia V speakers with Wilson LōKē subwoofers. At various times, I switched back and forth between the Soulution 727 preamplifier and the twice-as-expensive D'Agostino Relentless preamplifier. All input and output connections were balanced. You've read it here before, and you'll surely read it here again: When reviewing any top-level preamplifier from a company known for superlative sound reproduction, the fundamental challenge is to get a handle on its sonic signature. After weeks and weeks of listening, I'm still at a loss to find an adjective far more telling than "fabulous."
Let's start with the Soulution 727's bass. During my chat with Hammer, I asked what music he used to evaluate his products. Imagine my delight and relief when, instead of citing "Hotel California," Diana Krall, Patricia Barber, Ella and Louis, or any of the other usual suspects, he offered eight choice tracks that I'd never encountered at a single show.
The first two, the Hadouk Trio's "Parasol Blanc 2" from their 2007 release, Baldamore: Live at Cabaret Sauvage (16/44.1 FLAC, Naïve Jazz/Qobuz), and the Renaud Garcia-Fons Trio's "Berimbass" from their 2005 album, Arcoluz (24/48 FLAC, Galileo Music Communication/Qobuz), demand a lot from a preamp. In both cases, the Soulution 727 responded with bass that was absolutely firm, precisely pitched, and correctly colored. No matter how fast the astounding bassist Garcia-Fons moved between pitches octaves apart, the 727 was right there with him, sounding completely undaunted and at ease. How the man changes colors and textureshis fundamental soundas he moves between Western and Eastern idioms, I do not know; all I know for certain is that the Soulution 727 conveyed his every shift, leaving me in awe of his (and its) virtuosity.
Bass is hardly these tracks' only raison d'être. "Parasol Blanc 2," for example, abounds in color contrasts created by instruments pitched many octaves apart. No matter how distinct the contrast, everything came through with ease, and far cleaner than through my desktop system's DSP-abetted subwoofer.
I didn't begin my audition with jazz tracks, however. Instead, I chose a recording I immediately decided to review: Kristian Bezuidenhout's performance, on a historically authentic fortepiano from 1805, of Mozart's Piano Concertos Nos.19 & 23 (24/96 WAV download, Harmonia Mundi), accompanied by the period instruments of the Freiburger Barockorchester. Through the Accuphase A-300s and the Soulution 727, the midrange sounded gorgeous and the highs alive but not too bright. The unique sound world of period instruments came through gloriously. I especially savored how the fortepiano sounded distinctly more percussive than a modern Steinway, with a more pointed, less sustained sound that showcased its harpsichord-like sparkle.
Beyond that lay the feelings inspired by the notes. I cannot begin to convey how delightful the opening movement soundedhow happy it made me feeland how well the Soulution 727 transmitted the unique tang, more distinct leading edge, peacock-worthy color display of period instruments. I was in heaven, and I also marveled at how perfectly the orchestra followed Bezuidenhout's lead, and how well the preamp enabled me to hear the orchestra's ability to mirror its leader's phrasing. By recording's end, I knew that the Soulution 727's truth-telling veracityits truth to the sourcewas something to cheer about.
The grounding upgrade
Barely a week into the review, and just four days before I left to cover the Warsaw Audio Show, I heeded the urgings of Audio-Ultra's Edward DeVito (footnote 7) and upgraded my grounding system. Admittedly, I had my doubts that anything much would come of the upgrade. After all, I'd had my electrical ground professionally measured, and it had been declared adequate to the task of high-end audio. Still, because Ed had proven correct and delivered in every electrical upgrade he'd suggested and carefully supervised, I decided to give it a try.
My original grounding system consisted of a very short run of 8-gauge copper wire to an 8' copper ground rod buried in mostly dry ground on the side of our house that is shielded by a roof overhang and our side entrance steps. While the national electrical standard stipulates an impedance of 25 ohms, copper's natural corrosion over time had raised my impedance to between 120 and 130 ohms. As I now know, the impact on sound was major.
Ed, carefully guiding two installers from Frederickson Electric, ensured that we would not intersect pipes and power lines as we upgraded every aspect of my grounding system, including the nature and location of rods. If I remain intentionally vague on the process, it's because I don't want to be responsible for someone setting fire to their home or disrupting power to their neighborhood because they decided to proceed on their own. What I will share is Ed's dictum: "I recommend testing the impedance every 4 to 5 years. Don't let it get higher than 25 ohms before beginning the process over."
I barely had time to listen before I was packed and on my way to Europe. But listen I did. I couldn't believe how much more silent and coherent the presentation had become. It was as though every issue I'd ever had with my system, save for room dimensionrelated brightness, had magically resolved.
Many people had told me previously that grounding was one of those final frontier journeys essential to getting the most from a sound system. Given how good my grounding already was, I thought I'd already done what needed to be done. How wrong I was, and how delighted I am by what I now hear. Better equipped than ever to evaluate subtle differences between premium components, I returned to listening.
The sound got even better
Wishing to dwell longer in period instrument paradise, I turned to Ernst Schlader's marvelous performance, on a superbly voiced copy of an historically appropriate basset clarinet, of Mozart's Clarinet Concerto. Schlader's virtuosity, on the Pentatone recording of Mozart: Symphonies 29 & 33 Clarinet Concerto (24/96 FLAC download, Qobuz), is enhanced by the colorful period instruments of Akademie für Alte Musik Berlin, led by concertmaster Bernhard Forck.
What I loved most was the unforced, natural, unadorned sound of every instrument. "It sounds beautiful as hell," I wrote in my notes. "Forget about playing the first three minutes; I'm listening to the whole damn thing, deadline be damned. I can't believe I'm being paid to do this."
With my new, superior grounding setup, I heard even more of the basset clarinet's distinct natural tang than when I reviewed the album some months before. This was not the first time when self said to self, if I had to choose between listening to this performance in a seat halfway back in a concert hall or on my system, I'd choose my system. Of course, the price of admission is ultimately far higher.
At that point, I called a halt to my mental chatter and proceeded to audition all the other recordings on Hammer's list. On the Helge Lien Trio's "Gamut Warning" from Hello Troll (24/96 FLAC, Ozell/Qobuz), cymbals were perfection itself. True to expectations, bass was totally in control and impressively deep. But there was something more. It's rare that any system has enabled me to feel the visceral impact of plucked strings as they vibrate against the neck of the double bass, but the Soulution 727, with more than a little help from the trio's sound engineer, made that possible. Score one in the gobsmacked department.
It had been a while since I'd heard the voice of Melody Gardot. On "March for Mingus," from her 2018 album Live in Europe (24/48 FLAC, Decca/Qobuz), I quickly learned that she, like Patricia Barber, chooses her backup musicians so carefully that they can easily enthrall on their own. As expected, the sound again remained clear and uncongested when everyone got going at once.
Comparison
I can't be the only Stereophile reader who is so eager to detect differences great and small between the performance of two very differently priced premium preamps, the Soulution 727 and the twice-as-expensive three-piece Dan D'Agostino Relentless, that, in my case, I switched back and forth three or four times. To anyone, including my editors, who says it's unfair to compare a one-piece $75,000 preamp to a heavier three-piece $150,000 preamp, I say, "As much as I hear you, I also know that many people who can spend $75,000 on a preamp can also shell out twice as much for one if they feel so inclined." So, at the risk of facing a firing squad, here I go.
The first thing to note is that these preamps exemplify polar opposite design aesthetics. That alone, rather than price or sound, will prove the decisive factor for many individuals. As much as sundry pundits and, Lord help us, TikTok influencers may proclaim that audiophiles only give a rat's ass about aesthetics when the preferences of their significant others come into play, I've seen far too many photos of beautifully designed listening rooms to believe that malarkey. In the audiophile fiefdom, going with the flow refers to more than sound.
Beauty resting in the eyes of the beholder, it seems best to steer clear of that hornet's nest and move on to sound. In my system and room, the Relentless threw a wider and deeper soundstage. It also surrounded instruments and voices with a lovely extra cushion of air, yet sounded even faster than the impressively fast 727. While this airy, plush cushion smoothed out harshness and warmed the sound a bit, it also paradoxically smoothed out timbral distinctness. Ultimately, on period instrument recordings, I felt the Soulution 727 better emphasized period instrument tanginess, but the Relentless rendered their attacks with more snap. That may sound contradictory, but it's what I heard and confirmed during multiple listening sessions.
Ultimately, comparing these two state-of-the-art preamps was anything but a simple case of black and white. Which preamp I preferred depended as much on which set of monoblocks I paired it with as what recordings I played through it. To those who can afford either preamp (or both), the only sensible path forward is to listen to them on your own system with the music you love. The sound of your associated components (including cables), power treatment, and room acoustics will ultimately prove central to which you choose.
What I know beyond question
The Soulution 727 preamplifier is one of the finest-sounding components I've heard in my system. Its bottom line is unadorned honesty. Timbres are absolutely, incontrovertibly, certifiably 100% natural, uncolored, and true-to-the-source. In addition, control is impeccable from the deepest bass to the most stratospheric highs, and timing is excellent.
If I weren't a reviewer whose responsibilities require that I parse for fine differences, I wouldn't have thought an iota about all that PRaT stuff (footnote 8). Instead, I would have felt as I did the first time I heard the Soulution 727 in my system: This preamp really has no sound of its own. Rather than impose a distinct sonic signature, it gets out of the way of artists and engineers and lets music and the emotional truth it conveys speak for itself. The Soulution 727 deserves Stereophile's highest possible recommendation.
Footnote 8: PRaT = pace, rhythm, and timing.
This is the only time a butt upstages a piece of equipment. It appears Melody Gardot has put in some gym time on the stair master
As a 70 year old man I am quite confident I would never be able to hear an audible difference between this piece and a Benchmark LA4. For those who can, good for you. Enjoy it while you can.
Do we know the age of the reviewers here and do they share with us every year the results of their hearing test by an audiologist? Or every 6 months? Not to mention their personal preference, as like professional wine tasters give very different ratings as well.
Don't be so sure. Unless you have hearing damage, I'm quite confident you'll be able to hear the difference.
jason
Who needs a preamp worth this when everything sources or dacs etc have their own volume controls these days with enough gain to "feed direct" into poweramps with one less set of interconnects.
All it serves to do is to add more distortion/colorations into the signal path and have "glitz value" for $75k. It does have a phono stage??
Cheers George
"This preamp really has no sound of its own."
When the ancient Greeks were finally able to create realistic true-to-life statues, the reaction of everyone was not "OH! how great" but "OH! how boring" and sculptors immediately went back to creating unrealistic statues.
If audio were purely aesthetic and subjective like art, this would be an apt analogy.
But it’s not.
Sculpture as an art is more akin to music, not audio playback— which is science and technology based.
The goal of high *fidelity* audio is realism, and accuracy plays a definitive part in that. Measurements would be totally irrelevant if the goal wasn’t accuracy.
So measurements are vital in audio. They give an objective, reproducible, highly detailed, and science based description of what a product will sound like.
I can’t imagine anyone wanting a deliberately unrealistic sound signature of playback equipment that is intended to faithfully reproduce music.
"This preamp really has no sound of its own."
And for those that believe that, the second set of interconnects I suppose don't either
Wow that's like inventing "perpetual motion"
Cheers George
I would like to add that I am a fan of extreme engineering. This was a large fraction of my work as a researcher before I retired. There is value in attempting to expand the limits of a given technology without regard to cost. Since we have an economic system that creates a relatively large pool of people for whom $100,000 represents pocket change better that they spend their spare change on luxury goods rather than buying politicians. A Rolex watch is a status symbol rather than a superior instrument for keeping track of time. The average human being is not going to miss their train by relying on a Timex watch. The person with the Rolex is not going to be more on time.
The Times/Rolex analogy isn’t a great one TBH.
You assume that a watch’s only function is to tell the time, and that the most accurate watch is “the best watch”. Chronographs have multiple time keeping functions besides just telling the time, for example.
And many watches are sought for their durability, waterproofness, and reliability. If you want something mission critical, it ain’t worth the metal it’s made out of if it stops working completely.
I think there’s legitimate reasons why the watch chosen for the moon landing was an Omega and not a Timex. To a certain point you get what you pay for.
I have a Rolex, and to me it is a beautiful, beautifully made watch. Picking it up, you can feel and see the quality right away, There is no Timex like it in the world. I enjoy wearing it, and for me it justifies the price differential over a Timex.
But if there were some sort of apocalypse or if I were stranded on a desert island, the watch I’d most want to be wearing is my G-Shock. Solar powered, mulitfunctioned, shock and waterproof, and radio controlled automatic synchronization to atomic clocks around the world, it’s more technologically advanced and rugged than either Rolexes or Timexes.
They all tell time accurately. But that’s far from the whole story
Thank you Jason for a very enjoyable read of something… I will never have. I can’t even imagine what it’s like to behold a unit like this - with or without it being plugged in! Like sw23 alludes, this is undoubtedly a fine piece of jewellery that only certain folk will ever enjoy. However, that’s why I love coming to Stereophile to read reviews like this. It’s the second-hand experience; the audible passion and appreciation of such craftpersonship that makes the reading compelling. Thank you as well for the notes on Ernst Schlader, I haven’t stopped listening since!
I’m with Sw23 on this one. I’ve waiting for my Benchmark HPA4 to arrive so I can plug it into my AHB2s and would like to think the journey will stop there. Hopefully my ears will convince me!
It appreciates the work that went into creating the product.
And JVS needs some appreciation too- That was classy.
Truly appreciated.
jason
First of all, thank you. it's great to hear from you.
While I'm certain you will not be traveling across the border to buy Canadian goods, there are other reasons to make the trek. If you can find your way across, I'd be glad to let you hear the 727, and the Relentless, and compare them to your Benchmark.
To everyone else: Chris and I go way back. Well, not as far back as I go.
jason
Good review, JS. But ... "the maximum gain for the balanced and unbalanced inputs to the balanced outputs was a little lower than the specified 4dB, at 3.7dB" --- that's a 7.15% deficit from spec, and it makes me wonder just how "precision" this device really is. If anything, I would have expected a box like this to be conservatively specified (e.g., 4dB spec = 5dB or 6dB actual). I have $200 Chinese boxes that are far more accurate at meeting their published specification.
This one, or another - priced tens of thousands less, no less - which JVS characterized as "clear and transparent and truthful as can be."
He went on to conclude that it "could very well be the keeper, the component that delivers a lifetime of joy and pleasure. It is one of those rare products whose excellence is proclaimed with every note. It is more than an object of beauty; it reaches into the emotional core of musical experience and opens a window onto ultimate truth."
I use my MSB Reference DAC as my system pre (Amps DD 400M MxV). Have been considering adding a preamp. Yet I'm confused. If the Soulution 727 has no sound signature how will it be an improvement over my DAC? Lots of back and forth on this subject. Jason can you shed some light on this subject? Cheers