Soulution 727 preamplifier Associated Equipment

Sidebar 2: Associated Equipment

Digital sources: dCS Vivaldi Apex DAC, Vivaldi Upsampler Plus, and Vivaldi Master Clock; Innuos Statement Next-Gen Music Server and PhoenixNET network switch; Small Green Computer Sonore opticalModule Deluxe (2); Broadcom/Avago AFBR-5718PZ 1GB SX-SFP, Gen 5 Fiber Optic modules; Nordost QSource linear power supply (2); Sonore Audiophile Linear Power Supply; Synology 5-bay 1019+ NAS with Ferrum Hypsos linear/switching hybrid power supply; Linksys MR9000 mesh router and Arris modem; Apple 2023 iPad Pro and 2017 MacBook Pro laptop with 2.8GHz Intel i7, SSD, 16GB RAM.
Preamplifier: Dan D'Agostino Relentless.
Power amplifiers: Dan D'Agostino Momentum M400 MxV monoblocks, Accuphase A-300 monoblocks.
Loudspeakers: Wilson Audio Specialties Alexia V with Wilson LōKē subwoofers.
Cables: Digital: Nordost Odin 1, Odin 2, and Valhalla 2 (USB and Ethernet), Frey 2 (USB adapter); AudioQuest WEL Signature; Wireworld Platinum Starlight Cat8 (Ethernet), OM1 62.5/125 multimode duplex (fiberoptic). Interconnect (XLR): Nordost Odin 2 and Blue Heaven (subwoofer), AudioQuest Dragon. Speaker: Nordost Odin 2, AudioQuest Dragon. AC: Nordost Odin 2, Valhalla 2, Valhalla 1; AudioQuest Dragon and Firebird. Umbilical cords: Ghent Audio Canare on NAS; QSource Premium DC cables with Lemo terminations for QSources.
Accessories: Grand Prix Monza 8-shelf double rack and amp stands, 1.5" Formula platform; Symposium Ultra Platform; Nordost 20-amp QB8 Mark III, QKore 6; Titanium and Bronze Sort Kones, Sort Lifts; Stromtank S-4000 MK II XT power generator, SEQ-5 Audio Distribution Bar; AudioQuest Niagara 7000 power conditioner, NRG Edison outlets; Environmental Potentials EP2050EE surge protector/filter; Wilson Audio Pedestals; A/V RoomService Polyflex Diffusers; Resolution Acoustics room treatment; Stillpoints Clouds (8); HRS DPX-14545 Damping Plates.
Music room: 20' L × 16'4" W × flattens at 9'4" H.—Jason Victor Serinus

COMPANY INFO
Spemot AG (Soulution)
Industriestrasse 70
CH-4657 Dulliken
Switzerland
info@axissaudio.com
(310) 329-0187
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
James.Seeds's picture

This is the only time a butt upstages a piece of equipment. It appears Melody Gardot has put in some gym time on the stair master

sw23's picture

As a 70 year old man I am quite confident I would never be able to hear an audible difference between this piece and a Benchmark LA4. For those who can, good for you. Enjoy it while you can.

cognoscente's picture

Do we know the age of the reviewers here and do they share with us every year the results of their hearing test by an audiologist? Or every 6 months? Not to mention their personal preference, as like professional wine tasters give very different ratings as well.

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

Ooopsie

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

Don't be so sure. Unless you have hearing damage, I'm quite confident you'll be able to hear the difference.

jason

georgehifi's picture

Who needs a preamp worth this when everything sources or dacs etc have their own volume controls these days with enough gain to "feed direct" into poweramps with one less set of interconnects.
All it serves to do is to add more distortion/colorations into the signal path and have "glitz value" for $75k. It does have a phono stage??

Cheers George

cognoscente's picture

"This preamp really has no sound of its own."

When the ancient Greeks were finally able to create realistic true-to-life statues, the reaction of everyone was not "OH! how great" but "OH! how boring" and sculptors immediately went back to creating unrealistic statues.

DaveinSM's picture

If audio were purely aesthetic and subjective like art, this would be an apt analogy.

But it’s not.

Sculpture as an art is more akin to music, not audio playback— which is science and technology based.

The goal of high *fidelity* audio is realism, and accuracy plays a definitive part in that. Measurements would be totally irrelevant if the goal wasn’t accuracy.

So measurements are vital in audio. They give an objective, reproducible, highly detailed, and science based description of what a product will sound like.

I can’t imagine anyone wanting a deliberately unrealistic sound signature of playback equipment that is intended to faithfully reproduce music.

georgehifi's picture

"This preamp really has no sound of its own."

And for those that believe that, the second set of interconnects I suppose don't either
Wow that's like inventing "perpetual motion"

Cheers George

sw23's picture

I would like to add that I am a fan of extreme engineering. This was a large fraction of my work as a researcher before I retired. There is value in attempting to expand the limits of a given technology without regard to cost. Since we have an economic system that creates a relatively large pool of people for whom $100,000 represents pocket change better that they spend their spare change on luxury goods rather than buying politicians. A Rolex watch is a status symbol rather than a superior instrument for keeping track of time. The average human being is not going to miss their train by relying on a Timex watch. The person with the Rolex is not going to be more on time.

DaveinSM's picture

The Times/Rolex analogy isn’t a great one TBH.

You assume that a watch’s only function is to tell the time, and that the most accurate watch is “the best watch”. Chronographs have multiple time keeping functions besides just telling the time, for example.

And many watches are sought for their durability, waterproofness, and reliability. If you want something mission critical, it ain’t worth the metal it’s made out of if it stops working completely.

I think there’s legitimate reasons why the watch chosen for the moon landing was an Omega and not a Timex. To a certain point you get what you pay for.

I have a Rolex, and to me it is a beautiful, beautifully made watch. Picking it up, you can feel and see the quality right away, There is no Timex like it in the world. I enjoy wearing it, and for me it justifies the price differential over a Timex.

But if there were some sort of apocalypse or if I were stranded on a desert island, the watch I’d most want to be wearing is my G-Shock. Solar powered, mulitfunctioned, shock and waterproof, and radio controlled automatic synchronization to atomic clocks around the world, it’s more technologically advanced and rugged than either Rolexes or Timexes.

They all tell time accurately. But that’s far from the whole story

ChrisUpNorth's picture

Thank you Jason for a very enjoyable read of something… I will never have. I can’t even imagine what it’s like to behold a unit like this - with or without it being plugged in! Like sw23 alludes, this is undoubtedly a fine piece of jewellery that only certain folk will ever enjoy. However, that’s why I love coming to Stereophile to read reviews like this. It’s the second-hand experience; the audible passion and appreciation of such craftpersonship that makes the reading compelling. Thank you as well for the notes on Ernst Schlader, I haven’t stopped listening since!

I’m with Sw23 on this one. I’ve waiting for my Benchmark HPA4 to arrive so I can plug it into my AHB2s and would like to think the journey will stop there. Hopefully my ears will convince me!

Glotz's picture

It appreciates the work that went into creating the product.

And JVS needs some appreciation too- That was classy.

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

Truly appreciated.

jason

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

First of all, thank you. it's great to hear from you.

While I'm certain you will not be traveling across the border to buy Canadian goods, there are other reasons to make the trek. If you can find your way across, I'd be glad to let you hear the 727, and the Relentless, and compare them to your Benchmark.

To everyone else: Chris and I go way back. Well, not as far back as I go.

jason

JL77's picture

Good review, JS. But ... "the maximum gain for the balanced and unbalanced inputs to the balanced outputs was a little lower than the specified 4dB, at 3.7dB" --- that's a 7.15% deficit from spec, and it makes me wonder just how "precision" this device really is. If anything, I would have expected a box like this to be conservatively specified (e.g., 4dB spec = 5dB or 6dB actual). I have $200 Chinese boxes that are far more accurate at meeting their published specification.

Ortofan's picture

This one, or another - priced tens of thousands less, no less - which JVS characterized as "clear and transparent and truthful as can be."

He went on to conclude that it "could very well be the keeper, the component that delivers a lifetime of joy and pleasure. It is one of those rare products whose excellence is proclaimed with every note. It is more than an object of beauty; it reaches into the emotional core of musical experience and opens a window onto ultimate truth."

skinzy's picture

I use my MSB Reference DAC as my system pre (Amps DD 400M MxV). Have been considering adding a preamp. Yet I'm confused. If the Soulution 727 has no sound signature how will it be an improvement over my DAC? Lots of back and forth on this subject. Jason can you shed some light on this subject? Cheers

X