Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Na! shame, it could have been, they missed out on DAB/+ and Internet Radio tuners.
Cheers George
I measured the C 3050 LE using my Audio Precision SYS2722 system. As the NAD is a class-D design, I didn't precondition the amplifier by driving a 1kHz tone at one-third power into 8 ohms. Nevertheless, before doing any testing, I ran it for an hour at a moderate power level to ensure that it was fully warmed up. At the end of that time, the temperature of the black grille on the top panel was 92.1°F/33.4°C. Because class-D amplifiers emit relatively high levels of ultrasonic noise that would drive my analyzer's input into slew-rate limiting, all the measurements other than frequency response were taken with Audio Precision's auxiliary AUX-0025 passive low-pass filter, which eliminates noise above 250kHz. Without the filter, 294mV of ultrasonic noise with a center frequency of 413kHz was present at the loudspeaker terminals. This noise was also present, at a much lower level, at the headphone output.
Looking first at the analog line input: With the NAD's volume control set to its maximum, the tone controls active but set to do nothing, the voltage gain at 1kHz into 8 ohms measured a relatively low 29dB from the speaker terminals, 4.2dB from the headphone output, and 0.07dB from the preamplifier output. The line input preserved absolute polarity (ie, was noninverting) from all three output types, and the input impedance was close to the specified 28k ohms at 27k ohms at low and middle frequencies, dropping to 23.6k ohms at 20kHz. The power amplifier input impedance was 50k ohms at 20Hz and 1kHz, 26k ohms at 20kHz, with a voltage gain into 8 ohms of 29dB.
The preamplifier's output impedance was 433 ohms from 20Hz to 20kHz; the impedance at the headphone output was 11 ohms, again from 20Hz to 20kHz. The C 3050 LE's output impedance at the speaker terminals was very low, at 0.09 ohm at 20Hz and 1kHz, 0.1 ohm at 20kHz. (These values include the series resistance of 6' of spaced-pair speaker cable.) Consequently, the variation in frequency response with our standard simulated loudspeaker (fig.1, gray trace) is minimal. The traces in fig.1 cut off sharply above 20kHz, due to the C 3050 LE converting its line input to digital. The C 3050 LE's reproduction of an analog 1kHz squarewave had the ringing on its leading and trailing edges that are typical of a linear-phase reconstruction filter (fig.2), and a 10kHz squarewave was reproduced as a sinewave, due to the odd-order harmonics that would give the wave its square shape being removed by the A/D converter's antialiasing filter.
Fig.3 shows the effect of the NAD's bass and treble controls set to their +6dB and 6dB positions. The bass control offers a range of +6.5dB/5.5dB below 50Hz, the treble control +5.7dB/5.2dB at 20kHz. Channel separation was good rather than great, at >70dB in both directions below 1kHz decreasing to 49dB at 20kHz.
With the Audio Precision ultrasonic filter, the line inputs shorted to ground, and the volume control set to its maximum, the wideband, unweighted signal/noise ratio (ref. 2.83V into 8 ohms) measured a good 72.1dB in both channels. Restricting the measurement bandwidth to 22kHz increased the ratio to 75dB, and an A-weighting filter increased it further, to 77.4dB. Spectral analysis of the NAD's low-frequency noisefloor (fig.4) revealed no spuriae related to AC power.
The C 3050 LE is specified as delivering a maximum continuous output power of 100Wpc into 8 ohms (20dBW). At our usual definition of clipping (ie, when the percentage of THD+noise in the amplifier's output reaches 1%), with continuous drive, the C 3050 LE clipped at 106Wpc into 8 ohms (20.25dBW, fig.5) and at 155Wpc into 4 ohms (18.9dBW, fig.6). Distortion levels at moderate powers (fig.7) were very low, though with an increase in the top two octaves.
The shape of the THD+N spuriae waveform at 10Wpc into 8 ohms (fig.8, bottom trace) is obscured by high-frequency noise, even with the Audio Precision filter, but the distortion signature appears to be primarily third-harmonic in nature. This was confirmed by spectral analysis (fig.9), with the second harmonic 10dB lower in level. Intermodulation distortion was very low, even into 4 ohms (fig.10), though the digitization of this input led to aliasing products at 28kHz and 29kHz. These frequencies suggest that the A/D converter operates at a sample rate of 48kHz.
Turning to the NAD's MM-compatible phono input, I connected a wire from the Audio Precision's ground terminal to the grounding lug on the NAD's rear panel to obtain the lowest noise. This input preserved absolute polarity at all three outputs. The phono input's RIAA correction was superbly accurate (fig.11), though it cut off sharply above 21kHz due to the input being digitized. The input impedance measured 45k ohms at 20Hz and 1kHz, dropping slightly to 34k ohms at 20kHz. The maximum gain at 1kHz was 33.6dB at the Pre output, 38.7dB at the headphone output, and 62.55dB at the loudspeaker outputs. To avoid clipping the power amplifier stage, I turned off the speaker outputs, removed the pre/power jumpers, and performed all the subsequent testing using the preamp output.
The wideband, unweighted S/N ratio with the inputs shorted to ground and the volume control set to the maximum was a very good 64.7dB in both channels, ref. 1kHz at 5mV. Restricting the measurement bandwidth to the audioband increased the ratio to 71dB, while an A-weighting filter further increased the ratio to 78.9dB. Spectral analysis of the phono input's low-frequency noisefloor (fig.12) revealed very low levels of random noise and no power supplyrelated spuriae.
The phono input's overload margins ref. 1kHz at 5mV were usefully high, at 19.3dB from 20Hz to 20kHz. The phono input's distortion signature was an equal mix of second and third harmonics, both lying at a very low 100dB (0.001%) with 1kHz at an input level of 20mV (fig.13). The level of the 1kHz difference product with an equal mix of 19 and 20kHz tones was also very low, at 100dB (0.001%, fig.14).
To examine the performance of the C 3050 LE's digital inputs, I used the Audio Precision's optical and coaxial S/PDIF outputs and data sent to the C 3050 LE over my network using BluOS. I saw no significant differences among the data sources. Both S/PDIF inputs locked to datastreams with all sample rates up to 192kHz.
With the volume control set to its maximum, a 1kHz digital signal at 20dBFS resulted in an output level of 5.97V into 8 ohms from the loudspeaker output, which is 13.76dB below the clipping level. A signal at 0dBFS gave levels of 3.45V from the headphone output and 2.13V from the preamplifier output. As with the phono input testing, I measured the digital inputs' behavior at the preamplifier output with the speaker outputs turned off.
The NAD's impulse response with 44.1kHz data (fig.15) indicates that the reconstruction filter is a conventional linear-phase type, with time-symmetrical ringing on either side of the single sample at 0dBFS. With 44.1kHz-sampled white noise (fig.16, red and magenta traces), the C 3050 LE's response rolled off sharply above 20kHz, reaching full stop-band suppression at 24kHz, though some low-level scalloping of the ultrasonic noisefloor is present. An aliased image at 25kHz of a full-scale tone at 19.1kHz (blue and cyan traces) can be seen at 70dB, and distortion harmonics of the 19.1kHz tone are visible above the ultrasonic noisefloor, the third harmonic being the highest in level at 67dB (0.04%).
When I examined the NAD's frequency response with S/PDIF data at 44.1, 96, and 192kHz, the response at all three rates dropped off sharply just below half of each sample rate (fig.17). Increasing the bit depth from 16 to 24 with a dithered 1kHz tone at 90dBFS lowered the noisefloor by 15dB (fig.18), meaning that the C 3050 LE offers between 18 and 19 bits of resolution. With undithered data representing a tone at exactly 90.31dBFS (not shown), the three DC voltage levels described by the data were well resolved and the waveform was perfectly symmetrical. With undithered 24-bit data, the result was a clean sinewave (also not shown).
The second-order intermodulation product at 1kHz with an equal mix of 19 and 20kHz tones with a peak level of 0dBFS lay at a low 97dB (0.0014%, fig.19), though the higher-order products at 18kHz and 21kHz were 20dB higher in level. The aliased images of the primary tones are present at 24kHz and 25.1kHz.
The NAD's rejection of word-clock jitter with 16-bit TosLink data (fig.20) was superb, with all the odd-order harmonics of the LSB-level, low-frequency squarewave at the correct levels, indicated by the sloping green line in this graph. However, the spectral spike that represents the high-level tone at one-quarter the sample rate is broadened at its base due to the presence of low-frequency random noise jitter. Repeating the analysis with 16-bit network data (fig.21) reduced the level of this random jitter.
Like NAD's M10, the C 3050 LE offers excellent measured performance overall.John Atkinson
Na! shame, it could have been, they missed out on DAB/+ and Internet Radio tuners.
Cheers George
I blame NAD, and the 3020 that I bought as a young lad, for a lifelong, impossible to shake addiction to great sounding audio at reasonable prices.
I have owned numerous of them over the years, both new and pre-loved. At present I have an M33 powering my main system, a C388 with a BluOS module in my bedroom and a C316BEE with a NODE next to me on my desktop. During the pandemic I tried out a Cambridge EVO150, returned it, then a Hifi Rose RS520 and I returned that as well, and finally settled on the M33, returning to the BluOS ecosystem where I belong.
More saying wifi by it's self to your home internet, for costless music 24hrs a day. Stations like Radio Paradise and Mother Earth's HD stream.
Cheers George
TuneIn--literally thousands of free music and talk stations to choose from and save as faves...for free
But looks like it doesn't do Mother Earth's Radio 3 different HD genres "FLAC 2800kbps/96kHz" which is what I want.
https://support.bluos.net/hc/en-us/articles/360000199908-What-Music-Serv...
Cheers George
Those bile-yellow VU meters don't match or complement the black front panel, and neither the black front panel nor the yellow VU meters complement that oddly-colored, artificial-looking wood grain on the top. This thing is impossibly ugly.
True. But that is one of the reasons it doesn’t cost an arm and a leg: no money was spent its looks. Given its price it is forgivable. I have seen hideously expensive gear looking like it was made in a shed. Far more objectable.
Certainly if it performed well, I could get used to its looks. But I'm inherently suspicious of anything Class D from NAD after my experience with their M32, which sounded awful.
Hat's off to NAD for styling this component. The parchment gauge rectangles and needles are the perfect nod to classic Japanese electronics and compliment the wood-look case. The smart NAD black recalls decades of all-go, no-show brand identity.
The overall effect is aimed straight at the heart of functional, minimalist, classic, table-top audio, a place NAD will be especially at home. Nice work, boys. More.
Must be easy to review gear at Stereophile these days. This is the second time Atkinson has just skipped reviewing the phono stage of an expensive item despite having a turntable -- and if there's something wrong with his turntable he certainly has access to others.
Why is everything so expensive now? In 2001, I got a bonus check, I treated my wife to some jewelery and treated myself to a NAD C340 int. amp & matching CD player ($300 each). I still use the C340, the CD player lasted 10 years of heavy use before it started skipping, no complaints. Last Black Friday I purchased an Echo Link ($160), Schiit Modi DAC ($130), Fire tablet ($40) for control & stream uncompressed from Amazon Music Unlimited ($90/year). I'm having a ball catching up on music I don't have on CD. These multi kilobuck integrateds are an expensive solution to a simple problem!
can someone please verify if there are multiple models of this unit. there are different power output meters (or VU meters per john). one variation shows wattage up to 60 watts, and another show meters up to 150 watts. what gives?
The Dirac looks very interesting. That's something you won't find elsewhere in one box without having to mess without a cluster of add ons.
The retro look is decent... but did NAD ever make an amp with vinyl wrapped wood grain like this before? Reminds me of cheap receivers from back in the day. They may have missed the mark on that one. Take a look at new Leaks in comparison.