iFi ZEN CAN headphone amplifier & ZEN DAC Signature V2 D/A processor iFi ZenDAC Signature V2 Measurements

Sidebar 4: iFi ZenDAC Signature V2 Measurements

Turning to the ZEN DAC Signature, I measured both the original version, serial number 5502000155, and the V2 version with which JMu did most of her auditioning, which had the serial number 5320000008. The two versions measured identically in all but one respect, which was the maximum output level in variable gain mode. The V2's maximum output in this mode was 2.07V balanced and 1.04V unbalanced, both values 6dB lower than the maximum outputs in fixed gain mode. While the original ZEN DAC's maximum levels in fixed mode were almost identical to those of the V2, at 4.3V balanced and 2.2V unbalanced, the maximum levels in variable mode were 6.7V and 3.35V, respectively. Distortion was very high at these levels, with crossover artefacts visible on the oscilloscope. The V2's reduction in the maximum output voltage is a desirable change.

Apple's AudioMIDI utility revealed that the iFi's USB input accepted 16-, 24-, and 32-bit integer data sampled at rates up to 768kHz. Apple's USB Prober utility identified both ZEN DAC Signatures as "iFi (by AMR)" from "iFi (by AMR) HD USB Audio," with the serial number strings "00000000" for the original version and "0003" for the V2. The USB port operated in the optimal isochronous asynchronous mode.

Both outputs preserved absolute polarity. The output impedance at the balanced outputs was 199.7 ohms, and at the unbalanced outputs it was 99.6 ohms. Both impedances were consistent across the audioband and very close to the specified values.

The impulse response with 44.1kHz PCM data (fig.9) indicates that the reconstruction filter is a conventional linear-phase type, with time-symmetrical ringing on either side of the single sample at 0dBFS. With 44.1kHz-sampled white noise (fig.10, red and magenta traces), the reconstruction filter's response rolled off above 20kHz, reaching full stop-band suppression at 24kHz. The aliased image at 25kHz of a full-scale 19.1kHz tone (blue and cyan traces) was suppressed by 82dB, and the distortion harmonics of the 19.1kHz tone lay close to –90dB (0.003%). The frequency response was flat in the audioband with a rolloff that started below half of each sample rate (fig.11). Channel matching was superb, and channel separation was 68dB in both directions across the audioband.

1221Zenfig09

Fig.9 iFi ZenDAC Signature V2, impulse response (one sample at 0dBFS, 44.1kHz sampling, 4ms time window).

1221Zenfig10

Fig.10 iFi ZenDAC Signature V2, wideband spectrum of white noise at –4dBFS (left channel red, right magenta) and 19.1kHz tone at 0dBFS (left blue, right cyan), with data sampled at 44.1kHz (20dB/vertical div.).

1221Zenfig11

Fig.11 iFi ZenDAC Signature V2, frequency response at –12dBFS into 100k ohms with data sampled at: 44.1kHz (left channel green, right gray), 96kHz (left blue, right red) (1dB/vertical div.).

The ZEN DAC V2's noisefloor was very low in level (fig.12) and free from any power supply–related spuriae. With dithered 16- and 24-bit 1kHz tones at –90dBFS, the increase in bit depth reduced the level of the noisefloor by 18dB (fig.13), which implies that the processor has 19 bits' worth of resolution. With undithered data representing a tone at exactly –90.31dBFS (fig.14), the three DC voltage levels described by the data were well resolved, while with undithered 24-bit data (fig.15), the result was a clean sinewave.

1221Zenfig12

Fig.12 iFi ZenDAC Signature V2, spectrum with noise and spuriae of dithered, 24-bit, 1kHz tone at 0dBFS (left channel blue, right red) (20dB/vertical div.).

1221Zenfig13

Fig.13 iFi ZenDAC Signature V2, spectrum with noise and spuriae of dithered 1kHz tone at –90dBFS with: 16-bit data (left channel cyan, right magenta), 24-bit data (left blue, right red) (20dB/vertical div.).

1221Zenfig14

Fig.14 iFi ZenDAC Signature V2, waveform of undithered 1kHz sinewave at –90.31dBFS, 16-bit data (left channel blue, right red).

1221Zenfig15

Fig.15 iFi ZenDAC Signature V2, waveform of undithered 1kHz sinewave at –90.31dBFS, 24-bit data (left channel blue, right red).

The ZEN DAC V2 featured very low levels of harmonic distortion. With the processor's fixed-level balanced outputs reproducing a 50Hz tone at 0dBFS (fig.16), the only harmonics present were the second at –94dB (0.002%) and the third at –110dB (0.0003%). Commendably, the levels of these harmonics didn't increase when I reduced the load impedance to 600 ohms. Tested for intermodulation distortion with a mix of 19kHz and 20kHz tones, the waveform peaking at 0dBFS, a multiplicity of low-level 1kHz-spaced tones were produced (fig.17). Reducing the signal level to –3dBFS eliminated these spuriae (fig.18), revealing actual intermodulation to be very low in level—below the levels of the aliased images of the tones at 24.1kHz and 25.1kHz, in fact.

1221Zenfig16

Fig.16 iFi ZenDAC Signature V2, spectrum of 50Hz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 0dBFS into 100k ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

1221Zenfig17

Fig.17 iFi ZenDAC Signature V2, HF intermodulation spectrum, DC–30kHz, 19+20kHz at 0dBFS peak into 100k ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

1221Zenfig18

Fig.18 iFi ZenDAC Signature V2, HF intermodulation spectrum, DC–30kHz, 19+20kHz at –3dBFS peak into 100k ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

Testing for jitter rejection with Miller-Dunn J-Test data is not diagnostic for USB data, as the bit clock is not embedded in the data. However, it will still reveal problems like supply noise on the DAC chip's voltage reference pin. With 16-bit, 44.1kHz J-Test data, all the odd-order harmonics of the signal's LSB-level, low-frequency squarewave were very close to the correct levels (fig.19, sloping green line), and no supply-related sidebands can be seen. The central spike in this graph, which represents the high-level tone at exactly one-quarter the sample rate, has some slight broadening at its base, but this will not have any subjective consequences. The same broadening can be seen with 24-bit J-Test data (fig.20), but there are no sidebands visible.

1221Zenfig19

Fig.19 iFi ZenDAC Signature V2, high-resolution jitter spectrum of analog output signal, 11.025kHz at –6dBFS, sampled at 44.1kHz with LSB toggled at 229Hz: 16-bit TosLink data (left channel blue, right red). Center frequency of trace, 11.025kHz; frequency range, ±3.5kHz.

1221Zenfig20

Fig.20 iFi ZenDAC Signature V2, high-resolution jitter spectrum of analog output signal, 11.025kHz at –6dBFS, sampled at 44.1kHz with LSB toggled at 229Hz: 24-bit TosLink data (left channel blue, right red). Center frequency of trace, 11.025kHz; frequency range, ±3.5kHz.

Both versions of the iFi ZEN DAC Signature featured excellent measured performance, but the V2 offers a worthwhile improvement over the original version, due to the reduction in the variable mode's maximum output level.—John Atkinson

COMPANY INFO
AMR/iFi Audio
US office:
105 Professional Pkwy. Suite 1506
Yorktown, VA 23693
(800) 799-IFIA
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
georgehifi's picture

For those that want a good cheap dac with volume, I think they shot themselves in the foot with the lack of digital input types.

Just a single usb3 input!
spdif, toslink, aes/ebu would have been nice to have, as the measurements show it's not a bad stand-alone dac with level control (simple two button up/down volume remote would have been great also).

Cheers George

Julie Mullins's picture

Just a single usb3 input!
spdif, toslink, aes/ebu would have been nice to have

I agree it would have been nice to have one more option anyway. But obviously they wanted to keep the unit compact, which means limited space.

MauriceRon's picture

another stereophile article where goerge hifi is in first with a grumpy man complaint

is it good form for one manufacturter to criticize the work of another?i guess any pub licicity is good pub licicicty.

did u know that this DAC and headphone output from iFI is intended for office desktops. no need for a remote when you can reach to turn.no need for spdif inputs when a computer's USB output is availble.

your little lightspeed sells for almost the same price as this ifi doublepack.does IT have a DAC with optical/coaxial?does IT have a remote?

Currawong's picture

...as far as I'm aware. They use a USB 3 socket so that they can include a better-shielded USB 3 cable in the box.

Jack L's picture

Hi

Agreed. How can a properly designed DAC come without any optical & digital coaxial inputs? Incredible for a DAC tagged for $599.99 & even made cheaply in China !!!

What a lame duck! Who wants it? I don't given some many better choices in the marketplace for muchh lower pricing !

Jack L

Julie Mullins's picture

Incredible for a DAC tagged for $599.99...

It's intended as a desktop duo—and it's $599 for the pair, the Set with DAC and headphone amp/preamp.

ok's picture

..and I don't mean usb 3 compatible, which is the case here and elsewhere, is not intended for audio. All other connections are mostly useless nowadays for better or worse.

windansea's picture

At this point in time, I don't see the need for any cable other than USB. I think USB is superior than toslink in terms of max data transfer. I've heard of other little differences like jitter issues with toslink, or toslink's advantage with electrical isolation, and toslink can handle a much longer run, but at this price level it makes sense for the company to focus on one input and go with the most popular one.

georgehifi's picture

Sorry not for me, depends on what source you have.
It may be fine to just have a usb input for those that are happy listening to the later compressed/louder, re-issues of streamed and download stuff.

EG of compression, the later re-issue of the same thing the more compressed it got, and usually the ones the streaming/download companies use.
https://dr.loudness-war.info/album/list/year?artist=Traveling+Wilburys

Cheers George

GRBH's picture

As far as audio file support goes, USB is more advanced than either spdif or toslink, both limited to 24-192.
USB is the only interface of the three mentioned, that can accomodate PCM rates above 24-192 or DSD.

Jack L's picture

Hi

Really ????

I am pretty gratified sonically with my 24-192 DAC with spdif+toslink i/ps withOUT any USB considering I am a vinyl addict. This USA NY brandanme DAC cost me muuuch less than the $599 Zen DAC.

Question to you re a realistic situation: e.g at my home: A 4K UHD TV with only toslink O/P & a WiFi DVD player gets only spdif O/P. That ZEN DAC would be useless there !!!

It ALL depends what you need to hook a DAC to, pal.

Listening is believing

Jack L

GRBH's picture

I'd hazard a guess, that without USB, computer based audio would have never gotten off the ground. A large part of the audiophile community, to this day, is still listening to high resolution music including DSD via a PC. Because of the interest in PC based music, enhancements to USB have taken place, such as the development of DOP,(DSD over PCM)

As you say "It ALL depends what you need to hook a DAC to"

Jack L's picture

Hi

Sure as long as you love PC based music ! Why not?

But digital music, even HD PC music, is not my favourite cup of tea considering I am a vinyl addict.

For conveniency & updating myself with the music world, streaming is the way to go for me. But for closest-to-live music enjoyment, vinyl analogue is my only way.

No offense intended.

Jack L

rwwear's picture

I've heard a lot of things I didn't believe pal.

buckaroo's picture

Right off the bat, the reviewer has no credibility. Why pick a reviewer who doesn't regularly listen to headphones?

Julie Mullins's picture

I'd like to clarify that I own a couple pairs of headphones and do listen to them regularly—when I host a weekly radio show (FM and streaming) for instance. But it had been a little while since I'd done critical listening through them was what I meant.

MatthewT's picture

The first sentence was perfectly clear as to what you meant.

X