Stereophile's Products of 1994 Home Theater Component of 1994

Home Theater Component of 1994:

Proceed PAV audio/video preamplifier ($4195; reviewed by Thomas J. Norton, Vol.17 No.9, September 1994 Review)

It took a while for high-end audio companies to wake up to the opportunities offered by the marriage of audio and video. But when they did, serious butt was kicked. B&W, McIntosh, and Fosgate/Audionics all produced some excellent THX-specification Home Theater speaker systems in the last year, but the Home Theater product that impressed every Stereophile staffer who heard it was the remote-control Proceed PAV audio/video surround-sound control center from Madrigal Audio Laboratories.

Exceptionally versatile in that it offers Dolby Pro-Logic decoding, THX processing, on-screen setup, a complete complement of audio and video inputs and outputs, and rear-channel decorrelation performed by subtly shifting the left and right surround signals randomly in time rather than in frequency or phase, the PAV is the most transparent surround-sound processor we've yet heard. Its effect on film soundtracks was magical, TJN noting its convincing reproduction of recorded subtleties such as the wind whistling around Ryan's house in the climactic scenes of Patriot Games, and the space and depth in Shawn Murphy's stunning recording of James Horner's score for the same movie. Even more important for this particular Home Theater curmudgeon, however, was that, until the appearance of the PAV, using processing on music signals to produce an enveloping soundfield without degrading the overall sound quality has been an impossible test for surround-sound processors to pass. The PAV passes it!

Tom Norton summed up his review thusly: "The PAV is expensive, but as part of a first-class, no-compromise Home Theater, it's worth every penny."

Finalists (in alphabetical order):
B&W Home Cinema THX loudspeaker system ($7000; reviewed by Thomas J. Norton, Vol.17 No.10, October 1994)
Fosgate/Audionics 3A audio/video preamplifier ($2799; reviewed by J. Gordon Holt, Vol.17 No.4, April 1994)
Fosgate/Audionics THX loudspeaker system ($7630; reviewed by J. Gordon Holt, Vol.17 No.4, April 1994)
McIntosh THX Home Theater loudspeaker system ($6500; reviewed by Thomas J. Norton, Vol.17 No.5, May 1994)

COMMENTS
Bogolu Haranath's picture

Hip hip hooray ....... The links are working :-) .........

JRT's picture

Nicely done.

Bogolu Haranath's picture

Looks like we finally have a new technical editor who knows what he is doing ....... May be he is a new member of the Stereophile staff? :-) .........

JRT's picture

I think that the Sennheiser HD580 headphones could have been a good choice, now a true classic and still desirable, and the Grandmother of the HD580 Jubilee, HD600, HD650, and some more recent additions from Sennheiser and MassDrop.

https://www.stereophile.com/headphones/1294senn/index.html

Bogolu Haranath's picture

Look at the measurements of Sennheiser HD-580 on Inner/Fidelity website ........ Not that great in bass frequency below 100 Hz :-) .........

JRT's picture

I would not judge them in retrospect against modern alternatives. Headphones have gotten better. A family of headphones that started with the HD580 remains very popular, and seems to have seen a new resurgence in popularity at MassDrop.

There were other headphones available in 1994. Some had better bass, but that came in combination with a different set of shortcomings. With the Sennheiser HD580, to me the errors seemed to be errors of omission, and those errors seemed to be more easily overlooked with the music I prefer. So I bought a pair in mid/late 1990s, very much enjoyed thousands of hours of listening through them, and my opinion is likely biased by that positive experience.

I would suggest that if somebody wants to listen to music heavy with synthetic bass, various genres spanning from 1970's disco music though the various follow-on genres that over-utilized subwoofers, then they should probably look elsewhere. I prefer other music.

For jazz and classical and blues, for most of the music recorded before disco, and for a lot of music that has been recorded since, I think that the original HD580 was a fine choice, and the original HD580 Jubilee Edition and HD600 might be better choices.

John Atkinson's picture
JRT wrote:
I think he should have chosen the Sennheiser HD580 headphones. https://www.stereophile.com/headphones/1294senn/index.html

The Sennheisers weren't reviewed until December 1994 so weren't eligible for the 1994 awards. As it says in the foreword, "To be a contender, a product had to have been reported on in Stereophile between the November 1993 and October 1994 issues."

John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile

Bogolu Haranath's picture

I would have chosen the Dunlavy SC-IV as the Editor's choice ........ Excellent engineering :-) .........

JRT's picture

John Dunlavy extracted some very good performance from the set of inexpensive Vifa drivers that he used in the SC-IV. He upgraded the woofers to ScanSpeak in a later variant. His crossovers were well developed and were far from being over-simplified.

tonykaz's picture

Your Dunlavys might have been good but the little Monitors are still in Production and still outstanding.

What ever happened to Dunlavy ?

Tony in Venice

ps. these guys were reviewing with Krell Amplification, doesn't Krell make everything sound wonderful ?

Bogolu Haranath's picture

AFAIK, Dunlavy designed the Duntech Sovereign loud speakers ....... Duntech still lists them as in production on their website ........ I don't know what happened to Dunlavy :-) .......

John Atkinson's picture
Bogolu Haranath wrote:
I don't know what happened to Dunlavy

John Dunlavy passed away in 2007 at the age of 78. In poor health, he had sold the Dunlavy company at the end of 2001 to pro-lighting company Wybron. I interviewed John in 1996: see www.stereophile.com/interviews/163/index.html.

The new owners of Dunlavy loudspeakers shut it down in November 2002: see www.stereophile.com/news/11492/index.html.

John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile

Bogolu Haranath's picture

May be Stereophile could review one of the new Duntech speaker models ....... Sovereign may be too big ....... Duntech Marquis seems to be the right size :-) ........

John Atkinson's picture
Bogolu Haranath wrote:
May be Stereophile could review one of the new Duntech speaker models ...

That would be up to Jim Austin, but as far as I am aware, Duntech loudspeakers are not currently distributed in the USA, though some mastering studios use them.

John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile

Bogolu Haranath's picture

Can we bribe Jim Austin with a bottle of Tennessee Honey? ........ Just kidding :-) ........

tonykaz's picture

Pose or ponder something

then... Poof,

The accurate background informs us !!!

Mr.JA1 is a Wikipedia or Audiopedia or even a Stereophedia to our Canadian friends.

Tony in Venice

ps. I just gotta say that our beloved Steve G the Audiophiliac is interviewing Rachel from Grant Fidelity, a Chinese Lady explaining the complex China Marketplace.

tonykaz's picture

Steve G pointed me at this Headphone back in 2011, long after it's being discontinued. It remains a better transducer than any "ANY" Loudspeaker Transducer system I've ever heard. ( of course, I haven't heard em all but I've certainly owned any dam loudspeaker I wanted. )

Still, did we have Superb Asgard 2 type headphone amplification in 1994 ?

In 1994, I probably would've nominated the LP12 & LS3/5a. Both are enduring greats !!!

Tony in Venice

ps. maybe even a pair of Linn Kans and matching stands , MIT 750 Music Hose & any Koetsu .

Staxguy's picture

It would be interesting to compare the top loudspeaker of this period, or say, the Dunlavy V.I. with the Wilson Chronosonic of today.

Allen Fant's picture

I trip back in time! J.A.

I still have this issue and had celebrated my 1st year as a subscriber (1993 to Present Date).

Robin Landseadel's picture

"The Vendetta is the odd man out, no longer being in production since the Berkeley fire destroyed designer John Curl's stock of parts and boards. (John Curl is offering Type C and D (diode) upgrades to present owners for $500 and $250, respectively.) It was available for nomination because it keeps on popping up its head in reviews as Stereophile's reference phono preamplifier."

I remember when it happened. I was making marble paper in the backyard, looked over my shoulder, saw this huge plume of smoke coming out of the hills.

Ortofan's picture

... how many buyers decided that the $1800 Arcam Delta 100 cassette deck (with its Denon sourced mechanism) was a better choice than the similarly priced Nakamichi CR-7A?
Or, if you simply had to have Dolby S, then either the significantly less expensive TEAC V-8000S or the Sony TC-K909ES.

Bogolu Haranath's picture

May be those buyers played 'Guardians of the Galaxy' mix-tape and decided that Arcam cassette deck sounded the best :-) ........

jimtavegia's picture

I have been playing around with my old Denon deck and it always surprises me when I do. I recorded a Helene Grimaud stream concert last week on both my Tascam DR-2d at 2496 and on the Denon and enjoyed them both as I doubt the stream was a high bit rate, but enjoyed it. I sure enjoy Ms. Grimaud's playing and the Phildelphia Orchestra is great. Miss the days the FM taping.

X