Doshi Audio Evolution Monoblock power amplifier Measurements

Sidebar 3: Measurements

When I unpacked one of the Evolution Monoblock amplifiers (serial number EVO2027), I wondered if I had the correct amplifier, as it looked identical to the Doshi Monoblock V3.0 that JVS reviewed in November 2018. It even uses the same quartet of Tung-Sol KT150 output tubes. But as Jason describes in this review, there are significant differences.

As with the older amplifier, before I started examining its performance on the test bench with my Audio Precision SYS2722 system (see the January 2008 "As We See It"), I left the amplifier powered up for 30 minutes then checked the bias current for each of the four KT150s using the front-panel display and the four trim pots on the top panel. I set all four to the recommended 190mV. The trim pots for adjusting bias are very sensitive, so it took me several attempts to achieve the exact settings.

The Evolution Monoblock has both balanced (Buffered) and single-ended (DIR.SE) inputs. Doshi recommends using the single-ended input, so I performed a full set of measurements with that input, repeating some tests with the balanced input. I measured a voltage gain of 29.0dB into 8 ohms with both inputs, and both preserved absolute polarity (ie, were noninverting). The XLR jack is wired with pin 2 hot. The input impedance is specified as 20k ohms, balanced, and 40k ohms, unbalanced. I measured 37k ohms at 20Hz and 1kHz for the single-ended inputs, this dropping inconsequentially to 34k ohms at 20kHz. The balanced input impedance was 39.2k ohms from 20Hz to 20kHz, ie, 19.6k ohms per phase.

The output impedance, specified as 0.5 ohms, was 0.54 ohms at 20Hz and 1kHz, rising to 0.67 ohms at 20kHz. As a result, the modulation of the Doshi's frequency response driving our standard simulated loudspeaker was a moderate ±0.35dB (fig.1, gray trace). The small-signal bandwidth was extraordinarily wide, extending at full level down to 10Hz and up to 80kHz into 8 ohms (blue trace). The ultrasonic rolloff began a little earlier into lower impedances, the response into 2 ohms (red trace) being –0.5dB at 20kHz. The 1kHz squarewave was superbly square (not shown), but the damped peak just above 100kHz in the frequency response traces correlates with critically damped ringing on the tops and bottoms of a 10kHz squarewave (fig.2).

421Doshifig1

Fig.1 Doshi Evolution Monoblock, frequency response at 2.83V into: simulated loudspeaker load (gray), 8 ohms (blue), 4 ohms (magenta), 2 ohms (red) (1dB/vertical div.).

421Doshifig2

Fig.2 Doshi Evolution Monoblock, small-signal, 10kHz squarewave into 8 ohms.

The new amplifier was significantly quieter than the old one. The unweighted, wideband signal/noise ratio, taken with the single-ended inputs shorted to ground, was 80.1dB ref. 1W into 8 ohms compared with 64dB. This ratio was not affected by the rear-panel ground-lift switch but improved to 85.6dB when I restricted the measurement to the audioband and to 91.6dB with an A-weighting filter in circuit. Spectral analysis of the low-frequency noise floor (fig.3) revealed low-level AC-supply–related harmonics at 60Hz and its harmonics, which were lower with the amplifier's rear-panel ground switch set to Lift (blue trace) than to Ground (red trace). But even without the ground lifted, these supply harmonics are all 20dB lower in level than the V3.0's.

421Doshifig3

Fig.3 Doshi Evolution Monoblock, spectrum of 1kHz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 1W into 8 ohms with ground lifted (blue) and connected (red) (linear frequency scale).

The Evolution Monoblock's maximum power is specified at 160W into 4 ohms (19.0dBW ref. 1W into 8 ohms). With clipping defined as when the THD+noise in the output reaches 1%, the Doshi's clipping power was 107W into 8 ohms (20.4dBW, fig.4) and 127W into 4 ohms (18.0dBW, fig.5). Relaxing the clipping criterion to 3% THD+N increased the maximum power into 4 ohms to 153W (18.9dBW), a shortfall compared with the specified power of just 0.1dB. (The AC power line was 118.5V with the amplifier clipping into 4 ohms.) Less power was available into 2 ohms—93W (13.8dBW)—but the Doshi Evolution amplifier would still have had no difficulty driving JVS's current-hungry Wilson speakers.

421Doshifig4

Fig.4 Doshi Evolution Monoblock, distortion (%) vs 1kHz continuous output power into 8 ohms.

421Doshifig5

Fig.5 Doshi Evolution Monoblock, distortion (%) vs 1kHz continuous output power into 4 ohms.

What I found interesting about figs.4 and 5 is that at powers above 25W, the Evolution Monoblock has lower distortion into 4 ohms than it does into 8 ohms. I examined how the Doshi's THD+N varied with frequency at 8.95V (equivalent to 10W into 8 ohms, 20W into 4 ohms, and 40W into 2 ohms), and at this level the lowest distortion was with 8 ohms (fig.6, blue trace). The THD+N was still very low into 4 ohms (magenta trace), but rose into 2 ohms (red trace) and in the top two audio octaves. As with the older amplifier, the distortion doesn't rise at low frequencies—a tribute to the output transformer's core being sufficiently massive (and heavy) not to become saturated.

421Doshifig6

Fig.6 Doshi Evolution Monoblock, THD+N (%) vs frequency at 8.95V into: 8 ohms (blue), 4 ohms (magenta), 2 ohms (red).

The Doshi amplifier's distortion signature at moderate powers into 4 ohms was almost pure third harmonic (fig.7), a characteristic it shared with the V3.0. However, the second harmonic rose in level at higher powers into 4 ohms (fig.8), and higher-order harmonics made an appearance. With an equal mix of 19 and 20kHz tones and the signal peaking at 60W into 4 ohms (fig.9), the decrease in the circuit's linearity at very high frequencies resulted in some higher-order products, the highest in level of which, at 21kHz and 18kHz, each lay at –60dB (0.1%). However, the difference product at 1kHz was lower in level than with the older amplifier, at –79dB (0.01%) compared with –71dB (0.03%).

421Doshifig7

Fig.7 Doshi Evolution Monoblock, 1kHz waveform at 10W into 4 ohms, 0.089% THD+N (top); distortion and noise waveform with fundamental notched out (bottom, not to scale).

421Doshifig8

Fig.8 Doshi Evolution Monoblock, spectrum of 50Hz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 60W into 4 ohms (linear frequency scale).

421Doshifig9

Fig.9 Doshi Evolution Monoblock, HF intermodulation spectrum, DC–30kHz, 19+20kHz at 60W peak into 4 ohms (linear frequency scale).

As with Doshi's Monoblock V3.0 amplifier, the Evolution Monoblock power amplifier's measured performance indicates conservative audio engineering, a superb output transformer, and the ability to deliver high powers into relatively low impedances.—John Atkinson

COMPANY INFO
Doshi Audio LLC
Charlottesville, VA
USA 22901
(917) 952-2758
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
JRT's picture

JA1, I always enjoy reading your measurements page(s), and I have one suggestion for measurements of any amplifier using an output transformer. You are probably well aware that at some combination of lower frequency and higher current the transformer core will begin to saturate and 3rd order harmonic distortion will significantly rise. My suggestion would be to include measurement(s) that better explore the high pass corner of the full power bandwith. That is intended as suggestion, and not any negative criticism of the measurements, explanations and other commentary you are already providing, all worthwhile. Thanks for what you do.

Jack L's picture

Hi

Besides nonlinear hysteresis transfer of the transformer core, high frequency distortion of any output transformer is also caused by its leakage inductance & winding capacitances, which in turn, change the loudspeaker loading impedance & phase angle.

More complicated will be: such leakage inductances of each half of the primary winding of a push-pull output transformer, like this $21,000 monoblock reviewed above, should be as little as possible. Otherwise, this will cause incomplete cancellation of 2nd harmonics, causing undue generation of higher order harmonics.

Such high harmonic distortion may be fed into the secondary winding & then into the loading loudspeaker by capacitive coupling unless there is an effective static shield between the primary & 2nd windings.

Ideally, lower plate resistance of the driving tubes, less will be such distortion at high frequencies. That's why triodes are always preferred to pentode/tetrodes which all get much much high plate resistance than a triode.

That's one of the reasons I always go for single-ended Class A power topology using triodes only - more output transformers friendly + better sound !

Listening is believing

Jack L

tonykaz's picture

Nice literature here, hell of a review, applause +++!

I look to have one of these designs, one day.

Nice Work,

Tony in Venice Florida

a.wayne's picture

This Doshi does measure well for a modern tooby amp ,, interestingly prices are clearly for limited sales numbers , 40K plus is a bit much for an unknown Brand, especially when considering its 3times that of the last VAC integrated tested ..

Regards

Jack L's picture

Hi

Agreed. In fact, some $200/output watt per JA's test report for 8ohm loudspeaker load is very expensive. 8-ohm load s the standard specified load impedance of any loudspeakers, right ?

The bias adjustment of the power tubes: It looks so similar to Dynaco ST-70. I did the same bias adjustment upgrade to my ST-70 by reducing the cathode to signal ground resistor (used to monitor the "bias voltage") from original 15.6R to 2.3R. Such reduction allows me to set the optimum voltage from original 1.56V to 107mV.
Yes, it pretty sensitive to adjust as JA pointed out in his test report. But I found it so helpful to improve the sound quality.

Why? The best sounding bias topology, IMO, is ground cathode. So by reducing the "bias monitoring" cathode resistor to practically MINIMUM would help to improve the sound.

$21,000 for 106Wrms/8-ohm is pretty expensive, my friend.

Jack L

Ortofan's picture

... (and sound quality) of this Doshi amp compare to those of the $11K McIntosh MC1502?
https://www.mcintoshlabs.com/products/amplifiers/MC1502

The MC1502 is the regular production replacement for the limited edition MC2152 - minus the fancier chassis with carbon fiber panels - but with identical specifications and sound quality.
Hi-Fi World tested the MC2152 and found that it could deliver 220W at the onset of clipping and 240W at 1% distortion.
https://www.mcintoshlabs.com/-/media/Files/mcintoshlabs/ReviewAwardDocuments/MC2152-and-C70-Hi-Fi-World-July-2019.ashx

The Part-time Audiophile reviewed the MC1502 and concluded that it provided "true high-end audiophile sound in all its refined glory, without any rare tube types, finicky setup, or usage idiosyncrasies."
https://parttimeaudiophile.com/2021/01/24/mcintosh-labs-mc1502-power-amplifier-review/

X