Which speaker technology do you have in your system?

It's been three years since we last asked this question, and reader Jeffrey Michael suggests we ask it again: With all the different speaker technologies on the market, which technology have you adopted for your current audio system?

Which speaker technology do you have in your system?
Dynamic/Cone drivers
65% (396 votes)
Electrostatic
4% (22 votes)
Electrostatic/Dynamic hybrid
7% (43 votes)
Ribbon
9% (55 votes)
Ribbon/Dynamic hybrid
6% (37 votes)
Horn
3% (17 votes)
Horn/Dynamic hybrid
3% (18 votes)
Other
3% (18 votes)
Total votes: 606

COMMENTS
Anonymous's picture

I have B&W Nautilus 805s, but I'd like to try electrostatics as soon as I can afford a pair. I've tried ribbons, horns and transmission-line

BobM's picture

You should pair up this question with one asking the primary type of music listened to. I'll bet you find high correlations between things like: classical and electrostats, rock and cones, etc.

Bill S.'s picture

I've lived happily with dynamic speakers for 25 years. However, I've recently heard the new MartinLogan line (Ascent & Odyssey) and must say I'm tempted for the first time to convert to electrostatic hybrids.

craig.elllsworth@ericsson.com's picture

Legacy Whisper with the Legacy Extreme bass unit.

Graeme Nattress's picture

Only horns give you the real dynamics of live music—nothing else comes close. Sure they have faults, but if you don't reproduce the "life" and energy of the music and performance, the rest is just window dressing.

cseymour@watlow.com's picture

Planar monopolar ribbon four-way with servo-controlled dynamic woofers: the lovely Infinity Epsilon system.

Al Marcy's picture

80 Hz e-horns with Lambda TD15MMM (triple magnet) drivers and dynamic tweeter horns from Taiwan

Chris S.'s picture

My current system has all Dynamic drivers, But I have been drooling over the hybrid stuff from Martin Logan for a while now and I think a nice shiney set of Prodigies are in my future. Unless I win the lottery and get the Statements!

Mike Healey's picture

Does that make me a conehead, consuming massive quantities of recordings? Electrostats, ribbons, and horns haven't done it for me yet, although a friend just invited me over to hear his MartinLogan loudspeakers. We'll see.

Anonymous's picture

MartinLogan Aeriusi.

Anonymous's picture

Long live B&W!

Douglas Henning's picture

There's nothing like a Dynaudio driver.

Peter B Noerbaek's picture

What else is there !

JOE's picture

PLANAR

Al Earz's picture

old infinity Kappa Sevens they are actually sounding better as I upgrade the cables audio majic and a new Linn Ikemi CD player have presented a much better sound image and stage so i think i'll keep 'em another decade or so. I tried the martin logan they are too fussy in set up though they present mids and highs with outstanding accuracy. I will probably buy dynamic/cones next time around

Max L's picture

I was a confirmed Magnepan user for many years, having gone through 4 models, the last being equipped with a ribbon driver. I never though it could get better- then revel happened, and I've not looked back since.

lord_coz's picture

The wood popping system is electrostatic, everything else is dynamic. It is sooo much cheaper to make a dynamic speaker good. When you have 4 seprate systems cost becomes a major issue.

erich's picture

Dunlavy SC-II with custom build dual subs.

Anonymous's picture

Acoustat Model III, still love them after all these years!!

Thom Taylor's picture

Magnepan Planar Magnetics don't quite fit any of your choices above. I enjoy mine and am lucky enough to have a spouse who lets me set them up properly, i.e. out in the middle of the room.

will's picture

Thiel 2.3 (concentric mid/tweet, cone woofer, passive radiator)

John Mallory Deacon's picture

I've always had cone speakers, but there are several hybrids I'd like to try, especially the big Martin Logans and the little Red Rose.

Pearson's picture

Kenwood (please forgive me)

Mike Finnedt's picture

I'v always had dynamic speakers in my system, they are reliable, and give good sound for the money. How ever, down the road I think I might consider a pair of Maggies, or Martin Logans, both of those sound real fast and crystaline clear, and they're making them more reliable. I haven't heard any horn speaker that I've really liked except from Avantgarde.

Rafael G's picture

Lowther single-driver rear-loaded horn. I know it's pretty minimalistically extreme but the scale and dynamics are amazing. No crossover wierdness plus the most presence/microdynamics I've ever heard and with just 3W! At Home Entertainment in NY the only things that better them that I heard were Pipedreams and JMLabs Utopias—and, possibly, Quads. IMHO

Craig's picture

The dynamic/cone path provides the best route for reproducing the entire audible sound spectrum at a reasonable cost from my listening experience.

David Schultz's picture

Ok, I chose Ribbon, but I've got everything but electrostatic in the house. Some of these polls need something like an "all the above" versus an "other" option!

John V.H.'s picture

B&W DM 330

tony esporma's picture

Pistonic motion makes me happy. Yep, get them big and little metal, plastic and wood pulp cones doing the olde InAndOut and Tony's a happy camper. I like panel speakers too, but they are just too bulky.

Doug McCall's picture

Seek ye the old paths . . .

Pages

X