Gryphon Apex Stereo power amplifier Page 2

Gryphon's founder, Flemming E. Rasmussen, endowed the Apex Stereo with a bold industrial design featuring several striking elements: large, smooth (fanned) heatsinks; massive, brushed-aluminum faceplates; robust spiked feet; and, with unabashed frontal prominence, the same triangular touchscreen seen on the Gryphon Commander preamplifier.

The Apex Stereo amplifier will set you back $99,000 (as will each equally massive Apex Mono, the Stereo's monoblock twin—double that for a pair). While not exactly budget-friendly, the Apex Stereo's price is competitive in the rarefied top-end audio market. It comes with a five-year warranty on materials and workmanship.

If you compare the Apex Stereo and Mono specs, you might be surprised to find that although the latter employs twice as many output devices per channel as the former (64 per mono channel), its output is only marginally higher: 225W versus 210W at 8 ohms. That's because Gryphon does not bridge the amp to achieve greater power output. Instead, in the mono configuration, it uses 32 output devices for each phase, resulting in output impedance that's half that of the mono version.

822gry.bac

Standing (and sitting) at the Apex
Once I was through the startup light show, satisfied that all was in good order, I warmed up the amplifier with an hour-long Roon stream while reading through some old reviews online. (Gryphon breaks in the amp at the factory before packing and shipping, but an hour's warmup is always a good idea, especially for a solid state amplifier.)

As I waited, I thought about some other amplifiers I've owned and reviewed and read some earlier reviews online: The relatively affordable Rotel Michi M8, which produced gobs of listening pleasure and musical delight, came to mind, as did the large and powerful Musical Fidelity kW750, which, in retrospect, was a little bright and rough around the transient edges despite its effortless power output, but then that was 17 years ago. I described the kW750 as "a big, heavy brute weighing 75 pounds"—ha ha ha—"and that doesn't include the 47-pound outboard power supply."

822gry.Nat-King-Cole

For my first critical listening session, I chose the double-45rpm 2009 Analogue Productions reissue of Nat "King" Cole's Love is the Thing (APP 824-45). The mastering annotation looked familiar; halfway through reading, I realized I had written it! The stereo recording from December 1956 is a string-drenched classic with a wide soundstage, but the violins have always had a slight, shrill edge. Nat, singing close to the microphone, has a rich, mellow sound, but the voice, too, is slightly edgy on top. Despite those minor flaws, this is a great demo disc.

The Apex Stereo's ease of presentation was immediately obvious: It was tossing off Nat and his orchestra with an almost offhand casualness, almost daring me to not pay attention. But it did the opposite—it fully engaged me. And I found myself drawn in deeper still by a newfound intimacy in Nat's voice. The amp exuded supreme self-confidence. It was like being in the presence of a charismatic person.

An undefinable, unmeasurable quality of the Apex asserted itself every day, in every listening session, imparting a sense of listening comfort. Over time, I concluded that this is due to the amp's overall, top-to-bottom speaker grip. This is more about timing than timbral or spatial presentation (although the Apex performs equally well in those areas, too). Everything in familiar music appeared better organized, timed, and settled, without restricting the musical flow. I've reviewed other solid state amps with a similar ability to grip and control speakers, but this was always at the cost of musical flow and transient subtlety; the result was also a degree of cardboard-cutout imaging, unnatural transient attack, and hyper edge definition. The Apex takes grip and musical flow to a higher level, particularly in the upper bass through the lower midrange, without such compromises.

I've always loved this Nat record, but it always showed its seams during string swells and certain vocal passages. The picture the Apex painted was seamless, complete, and supple. The acoustical envelope and generous sustain around the lower strings, cushioning Cole's voice, produced supple, textural richness that didn't mask transient definition and detail. My skepticism about achieving this with a stack of transistors went out the window.

822gry.Ravel

Next was Ravel's Rapsodie Espagnole from the box set Ravel: Complete Orchestral Works (LP, Electric Recording Company ERC 061/UK Columbia SAX 2477) with André Cluytens conducting the Paris Conservatoire Orchestra, first released in 1963. Although notably transparent, this recording sounded somewhat bright and distant. The Apex presentation was wide and stable, the soundstage well back from the speakers, not adding warmth to the cool, bright, transient-rich sound.

Side 2 of this record concludes with Ravel's famous La valse, which goes from melodic, delicate, soaring strings to cacophonous, off-kilter explosiveness. It's filled with complex percussive transients, brass, woodwinds, rumbling timpani, and delicate harp glissandi—a treacherous environment for a grainy or etchy amplifier, equally so for one that blunts or softens transients. The Apex delivered this piece better than I've ever heard it, with a lifelike sense of depth. Harp glissandi were precise, rich, and not too sharply drawn. Brass and woodwinds had body and definition and were imaged precisely to mirror the physical stage. The timpani at the back of the stage were well-defined rhythmically and spot-on timbrally. Their occasional exclamatory smack demonstrated the amp's ability to oblige abrupt sonic demands with alacrity and authority. But beyond that, the presentation proved that the Apex can sizzle cleanly and quickly when called upon and deliver even complex musical strands without the etch and grain that often accompany highly responsive solid state amps. Fast, precise attack; generous, lingering sustain; clean, smooth decay—these, for me, are the hallmarks of a great amplifier, and the Gryphon excelled at all three.

822gry.Royce-Hall

Moving on to streaming, Neil Young's Royce Hall 1971, from his Bootleg Series (192/24 FLAC, Reprise/Qobuz), demonstrated the amp's transient precision, speed, transparency, and that special lower-midrange grip. Young's voice and guitar hovered palpably between the speakers, the hall acoustic trailing subtly behind, adding warmth and a strong sense of dimensionality.

Next, I played Daft Punk's "Get Lucky," from their album Random Access Memories (24/44.1 MQA, Columbia/Tidal). The Apex Stereo's attack speed, taut midbass, and clean transients were demonstrated amply. The vinyl version of this album (Columbia 88883716861) produced a far greater sense of three-dimensionality, no less midbass, and uncanny imaging; you could all but see the singers. Cranking it way up on "Beyond" bathed the room in Daft Punk 3D luxury. You can crank up this amp, and it won't let you down—not timbrally, rhythmically, nor spatially. It just gets bigger and louder and never becomes hard or loses hold of the speakers.

The Apex Stereo's grip on the speakers produced an unexpected, welcome effect: Because I sit quite close to the tall XVXes, sometimes, depending upon the recording, the soundstage appears higher than it should be, floating in space. The Apex, possibly because of its stellar performance in the midbass to bottom-end range, consistently presented a floor-based soundstage at the proper height. Listening to Charles Lloyd's delightful live recording Trios: Chapel, with Bill Frisell and Thomas Morgan (Blue Note promo FLAC; the vinyl wasn't due until the end of June), eyes closed, the soundstage appeared to extend from just above the woofer enclosures to a height that reflected the acoustic space of the recording, the Coates Chapel in San Antonio, Texas. And although the spatial presentation was high and deep, the musicians remained grounded and were imaged solidly and believably.

A synergistic combination
It made complete sense to audition the Gryphon Apex Stereo amp with Gryphon's recently reviewed Commander preamp. The importer agreed to bring the preamp over, which was not an easy undertaking, as it consists of two bulky, heavy chassis.

Once here, the Apex–Commander team seemed to work synergistically and took my listening experience with the Apex Stereo—one of the best home auditions I've ever had—to a higher level still. (I've noticed similar synergy with the darTZeel amp– preamp combo.)

822gry.2

Back in 1997, King Records, in Japan, hired Record Technology Inc. (RTI) of Camarillo, California, to press a series of Decca/ London reissues. Mastering overseer Robert Pincus (Cisco, Impex) sent me a stack of white-jacket test pressings, including Vladimir Ashkenazy's Liszt Recital (King KIJC-9206). That record through this system (X-quisite ST cartridge, the AXIOM tonearm reviewed elsewhere in this issue, X-quisite step-up transformer, and Stealth Helios DIN/RCA cable), with this Gryphon amplification, produced the most realistic piano sound I've ever heard in my room, in every known sound-reproduction parameter and probably a few that are not yet known. (The Lyra Atlas Lambda SL/Schröder arm/OMA K3 combo was slightly less percussive and somewhat darker but also riveting.) The combo also produced the most believable Rolling Stones performance yet on the supposedly murky and impenetrable Exile on Main Street (Artisan Sound original Rolling Stones Records 722507). A 50-year-old record played for 50 years delivered a huge shot of adrenalin—and not because the amplifier was about to catch fire!

I don't think I've ever used the old audiophile acronym PRaT (pace, rhythm, and timing), so I'll use it now, in my final Stereophile review: The Apex Stereo amp has PRaT, but the Apex–Commander combo has it in spades. The Apex Stereo amp, alone and combined with the Commander preamp, seems to up the pace of everything, as if your turntable is running fast, while simultaneously digging further down into each musical instant, making each gesture live longer, with precise attack, generous sustain, and long decay. The amp simultaneously speeds things up and slows things down. A neat trick. That's the long and the short of it.

COMPANY INFO
Gryphon Audio Designs ApS
US distributor: Gryphon Audio N.A.
anthony@gryphon-audio.dk
(201) 690-9006
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
Anton's picture

Similar to Mike's burning ampnesia....

When I was 20, the cassette deck in my car seized up and would not release the tape I was playing. My budget was too tight for a new deck, so I simply listened to that darned tape over and over and over and over for an entire year. I don't remember which tape it was.

Scott Strother's picture

Gryphon should be justly proud. I don't think I'd ever leave the house, listening to that masterpiece.
It's colossal!

georgehifi's picture

Gotta love a real amp (linear) that can do current into low impedance, and probably 1ohm as well if the test gear could take it. By doubling it's wattage for each halving of load impedance.❤️
And that can do real square wave testing (without AP class-D filters) to show the real thing, and not a imaginary pictures like the ones presented of Class-D amps square waves.

Cheers George

windansea's picture

Reading Mr. Atkinson's measurements, this beastly amp does not seem to double down from 8 to 4 to 2. Not like the Krells were famous for. Kinda weird, it's gigantic, cost no object, yet fails the ol' "double down" test.

oldslat88's picture

Sorry to see you go. Looking forward to following you at Tracking Angle.

MhtLion's picture

Michael, I’m very saddened to hear that this is your final review on stereophile. Please note you are my favorite reviewer of all time. Wish you well on everything!

volvic's picture

This beast could easily drive both my Linn Kans I & II…overkill??? You betcha!!! Damn the torpedoes!!!! What a terrific read. Godspeed Mickey, see you on the other side.

sw23's picture

I'm sure it sounds glorious. But why cram all those goodies into one box? Is there some advantage I'm unaware of?

supamark's picture

They also make a mono version, the Apex Mono for those with more room. Personally, I have room for neither :(

Mark Phillips,
Contributor, Soundstage! Network

Glotz's picture

I really wished they had this amp for audition at AXPONA this year... sigh.

Great review cutting to the truth of the sound and I am going to miss the crap out of Mikey in these pages.

Finally got to meet Mikey this year as well! He was funny and nice like always. I was too stoned.. lol. Gonna miss him but Stereophile will only get better and so will TAS.

Happy 60th Stereophile!!!

Glotz's picture

A hundred bucks more? Been thinking about Class A tube equipment recently.. I also wonder about the the additonal heat in summer.. lol.

Herb Reichert's picture

according to the specs the Apex consumes only 0.5W at idle

if that is true you will only pay to play . . . think quarter coins not c-notes

hr

Anton's picture

I wonder which power cords they supply with it?

Glotz's picture

Thanks Herb!

supamark's picture

Sad to see you move on from Stereophile/Analog Planet, your turntable reviews are aces - I bought my Rega P10 based largely on your review, you perfectly described the sound.

Your experience with the Apex mirrors that of my editor at Soundstage! He said it stomped a mud-hole in his Boulder 2060 (a very good amp itself) with Vivid Giya G1 speakers. That's two very different speakers, made by designers with very different design goals, with which this amp kicks ass. I think we have a new contender in the SotA for amps. Time to head down to the local dealer and spend some time with a Gryphon amp.

I had to google the founder to make sure he wasn't the same Flemming Rasmussen that produced/mixed Metallica's "...and Justice for All" (he isn't, hence the "E.") but that would have been funny (both strange and ha-ha).

Mark Phillips,
Contributor, Soundstage! Network.

michelesurdi's picture

i wonder,would two hundred thousand bucks get you the same measurements in both channels?

tabs's picture

If one thing makes me sick to my stomach about the old guard it’s that Stereophole keeps making excuses for “sample deviation” and such when the highest of high end stuff doesn’t measure well. These people are charging one hundred thousand dollars per unit, and you are letting them off the hook for not delivering on basic quality control? What are regular customers supposed to expect if Gryphon can’t be bothered to provide a solid test unit to Stereophile? What does that say about their respect for Stereophile in the first place? Or their customers?

Stereophile played the same game with D’Agostino amps not too long ago that came in subpar with all sort of problems. It’s embarrassing and everything anyone needs to know about where their interests lie.

Maybe the simplest answer to all these problems at the high end is quite simple. It’s that the likes of D’Agostino and Gryphon are trading on brand and image and not on any discernible engineering advantage, and that their customers don’t really care as long as it projects the right message or has the right look.

ChrisS's picture

...crash.

David Harper's picture

yes but a good argument can be made that at least the Lambo is, objectively, worth it's price. A stereo amp, not so much.

ChrisS's picture

...and counting...

Or any item in a 99cent store.

Anton's picture

I grew up in Reno, NV. We had a local Ferrari dealership owned by Bill Harrah of Harrah's casinos and car collection.

Harrah's dealership was the biggest in the world at the time, and I couldn't see why a place like Reno had such a big deal dealership. Ferraris were thick on the road in our area. We even had a Ferrari festival and annual hill climb.

I later found out that that dealership worked with his auto collection restoration department and every new Ferrari that came in had the body panels properly aligned, the stitching brought to uniform quality, the paint finish finished, etc.

His dealership prepared the cars he sold so the new owners would have what they thought they should have buying a car like that.

Maybe ultra high end audio offers a niche for buyers where a new owner could have his 100,000 dollar amp drop shipped to a "finisher" like Harrah's used to be, and the buyer, for a small additional fee (20%) would know that his new toy was performing as promised. Otherwise, how do consumers know they are getting what they purchased?

I think this could make some coin.

The prep service could even offer to make sure the units get paired with the optimal power cords, for an additional fee and purchase, of course.

I'm too old, but one of you young folks should totally do this!

ok's picture

..like Burmester (and Kondo I think) provide indivindual measurements for every single component they make. For that kind of money they should all do the same I suppose along with a 10-year guarantee.

Jack L's picture

Hi.

Agreed for gears at such hefty pricing levels.

But different bench test methods may yield not-identical data.

To measure the output power of a power amp, the dummy loads alone, can be different from the different amp manufacturers, & from different labs. Many use only a hi-power resistor as the dummy load.
Quick & easy, but it is totally different from the realworld situation: loudspeaker system !!!!

The power data thus measured is only theoretically ideal condition which do not reflect the actual output power performance when driving loudspeakers which got some complex LCR AC network, not pure resistance at all.

For Stereophile lab, a simulated loudspeaker load built up of LCR
network is used to used to measure the output power of any integrated/power amp under review. This is therefore much closer to the realworld situation an amp is loading. Therefore much more reliable performance data we can read.

Such similulated loudspeaker load already exposed the harmonic distortion vs outpower power 'weakness' of this 10-grander Danish made power amp at 4/2-ohm loads !

So "individual measurements for every single component" is helpful but not any all-cure remedy for its realworld performance.

Listening is believing

Jack L

ok's picture

..but my concern was more about quality control. This is an extraordinary amplifier no doubt, but something inside the right channel is probably broken, something that can most likely be easily fixed and individual measurements would certainly let show. In fact I think this is the main purpose of audio measurements in general and not a mine-is-bigger competition.

Anton's picture

More of a check to make sure it isn't broken!

Jack L's picture

Hi

For so expensive amps as such will surely be hand-built individually on a bench per order, instead of on a production line like parts, e.g. resistors & capacitors. The component once completely built will surely be bench tested to ensure fully functioning & complying the design specs before shipment to the dealership depots.

Heavy components, like this 500-pounder, are much more vulnerable to damage during transit from the manufacturers overseas to local dealership depots & then to customers' homes.

Good luck to the enduser customers !

Jack L

Anton's picture

When did it break and who broke it.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

AnalogueFan's picture

The analysis would have been fairer if two Gryphon monoblocks had replaced two dartZeel monoblock.
However.
Excellent Review!

X