Listening #104

It wasn't so much a vow as a prediction: After selling my last pair of Ticonal-magnet drivers and the homemade horns I'd carted around to three different houses, I supposed I would never again have a Lowther loudspeaker in my humble house.

That remains literally true: The 7" full-range drivers to which I'm listening today are from a German company called Voxativ; the horn-loaded cabinets from which they play were also designed by Voxativ, and are made in Germany by the Wilhelm Schimmel piano company. And, with all due respect to Lowther, the 75-year-old English loudspeaker firm that launched a thousand DIY fantasies—not to mention a thousand very lively wavefronts—the Voxativ drivers and horns take the Lowther concept further than anyone else of whom I'm aware.

El Sidcup
For the newbie: Although there exist a few companies that can trace their origins to a time when all amps were low-powered, Lowther is the only one of those whose audio line remains exclusively dedicated to high-efficiency loudspeakers. Their calling card is a full-range driver with a 7" cone made of pale yellow paper; a smaller, concentric high-frequency cone, made of the same paper and moved by the same voice-coil; an extremely powerful magnet; and an intentionally small voice-coil gap—which, as you can imagine, requires both a precisely wound voice-coil and a perfectly round voice-coil former.

Executing those last two details has, at times, seemed a challenge for Lowther. Between 1996 and 2006 I examined no fewer than 20 pairs of Lowther drivers, some of which I bought for myself, others of which were built into review samples from other loudspeaker manufacturers. Not all of those drivers had a voice-coil and former whose shape precisely matched the gap in which it was meant to operate—the perennial culprits were seams on the formers that surely could have been flattened with a little effort and ingenuity—and, as a consequence, some of those drivers at times made disagreeable noises. Nor were those the only (apparently fixable) flaws.

Things like that don't go unnoticed for long—and there are always one or two people among the noticers who think they can do a better job themselves. So it goes in our little community: No one wants to discard the best parts of the thing (the powerful magnet, the small gap, the idea of a single motor driving two very light cones), and certain other design elements (the parchment-like appearance of the paper; the odd, asymmetrical pattern of the driver's four mounting bolts) long ago wove their way into the DNA of DIY. As a result, many high-sensitivity full-range drivers of recent vintage appear identical to that classic 7" Lowther driver—yet some are otherwise original in their design.

Among the new wave of Lowther competitors is a German engineer and audio enthusiast named Inès Adler. After working for Mercedes-Benz for a number of years—and with 14 patents to her name in the field of electronic monitoring systems for diesel motors—Adler and some friends decided to try to make a better wideband driver. "I think everyone who owns Lowthers becomes interested, at some point, in improving them," Adler told me recently. Then she added, with a laugh, "It is the German way: When we make something, we want to make it perfect!"

In time, Adler shifted her engineering efforts from rebuilding Lowthers to designing and making her own 7" dual-cone driver. "I saw three things that I disliked about the Lowther driver," she says. "One, it was impossible to make good bass: The cone had insufficient stability at high excursions. Two, it had the famous Lowther 'shout' that made voices sound sharper than real: The louder the driver played, the worse the shout—but turning them up was something people wanted to do, to get good bass. And three, the top range was missing: There was nothing over 15kHz. So it was clear, I had to design my own driver."

Cosmetic similarities aside, Adler's Voxativ AC-3X driver is indeed a different animal. For one thing, the Voxativ's convex surround is the reverse of Lowther's. "We do that to hide something," Adler says, laughing again. "We give the cone more material, more paper, so it goes past the surround at the rear. The cone is effectively larger for the rear wave than the front wave." Adler also says that her surround, the foam for which was developed for Voxativ by a German chemical company, is designed to accommodate a much greater excursion: 10mm total, compared with the Lowther driver's 2mm. The cone geometry, too, is different, and the generously sized whizzer cone has a very slight roll on its outer edge, as compared with the much larger roll Lowther added to their own whizzers beginning in the late 1990s: Adler says that too much of an overlap creates unwanted reflections, and that her more modest crease is just enough for some added rigidity.

At a time when DIY enthusiasts are known to pay dearly for alnico magnets—in loudspeakers as in phono cartridges—the Voxativ approach goes against the grain. Among the versions of their driver that are available to the DIY community (the Voxativ AC-3X driver is not available separately), Voxativ offers one with an alnico magnet, for customers who require such a thing. That said, Inès Adler—who does virtually all of her design work by ear—contends that the alnico version sounds no better than the one built with a more compact, powerful neodymium magnet. Besides, she adds, alnico loses its power over time, unlike neodymium. The latter's smaller size also makes the Voxativ AC-3X suitable for a horn design that seeks to minimize the volume of air in the throat area, ie, the space immediately behind the driver in a rear-wave horn, where pressure is a significant design factor. Speaking of which . . .

Dangerous curves
"I wasn't interested in making cabinets," Inès Adler says, "but when drivers get better, the idea comes over you: Maybe I can do more. . ."

Thus did the Ampeggio come about: a twice-folded horn, nearly 9' from throat to mouth, that's intended to amplify the driver's rear wave—and because all such horns act as acoustical low-pass filters, the real objective is to maximize in-room bass extension. The Voxativ driver's high excursion was one boon to the design effort; another was an unexpected source of engineering inspiration: "I had the idea to optimize [the canine's] radiation resistance," Adler says, "and I thought of the Lockheed 'Stealth' fighter plane, which has no real curves. Its surfaces are all faceted." Realizing that she couldn't control the reflection of the soundwaves within a circular path, Adler went the other route and created the bends in the Ampeggio horn with a series of "facet boards," the sizes of which increase as the sound travels from throat to mouth. The narrowest of those boards (about 2") are used to create the tight curve of the horn's first fold, with wider boards comprising the second bend, near the top of the cabinet, and the widest used to form the comparatively large-radius curve just behind the horn's mouth (which itself measures about 14" square).


Timbo in Oz's picture

Hi there Art from down under.


Not a criticism of your piece, mind! :-)!


But whenever this subject comes up I am reminded of a scene from the BBC's series "The Gliitering Prizes" based on Frederick Raphael's novel.

The main character, English and Jewish (played by Tom Conti) has finally succeeded* as a writer and runs into an old girlfriend? in a cafe, buys her coffee and then offers her a lift.

His new car* is a Mercedes 2-door sedan, and she gushes about how what perfect cars the German's make IIRC, or maybe just Mercedes-Benz.

And he says,

"Jah! Tomorrow ve attack Russia!"

The head of the RAF's Y (RF intercept) service in WWII said he could always tell if a suspect transmission/transmitter was German, just by looking at how stable it was. Needlessly stable for the measurement task that radar's do.? Yes? German.

Hitler would not accept that the T34 was a good tank because the casting edges and spall was barely cleaned up!

You see, the thing's still got a whizzer. Since hearing what dewhizzering did for the famous and rare Coral Beta 8 and 10*, I've remained sceptical about their value. (*elaborately designed whizzers they were, too.) 

A good wide range driver (5-6.5 inch frame maximum) without whizzers, supported by a good bass system from about 200hz down and a good tweeter from about 6k or so, should give even more of that single driver goodness, with LESS of the downsides. It should be possible to design it so that it needs neither a high or low-pass filter, and the designers can then focus on filtering the bass LP and Tweeter HP to blend really well - inaudibly.

The potential to manage dispersion, and room / power response curves to blend well with the direct sound also gets easier.

I am not persuaded that this hobby needs wide dispersion speakers

Timbo in Oz

nunhgrader's picture

I truly love Art's work - love the interesting Lowther, full range driver speakers, tube amps etc - keep up the great work!

Freako's picture

During my 45 years of interest in all things audio, I have never listened to a Lowther speaker or any other like it, I still found this article one of the most exciting and interesting to read, probably mostly because of your most vivid and - from your point of view - authentic remarks and explanations on the subject. I dig this!

My preferred setup has always been full range speakers and solid state equipment, and I still stick to it, but I'd have to admit that I'd love to hear Miss Adlers speakers in a setup like yours. They are damn certain to move me; I can tell that much from this article, and I thank you a lot for that.

One must be forever thankful for those who never stray from the path to ever improving listening experiences, in which any audiophile with an open mind, and who is lucky enough to be present, can indulge.