The Entry Level #36

In an August 21 post to his popular Lefsetz Letter blog, music-industry analyst Bob Lefsetz shared with his readers the great and often surprising joy of listening to music through a good set of headphones, specifically the open-back, planar-magnetic Audeze LCD-2. Lefsetz clearly does not mess around: He went straight to the top of the headphone hierarchy. If you're at all familiar with the exciting world of headphone listening, you've heard of Audeze (pronounced odyssey). Since their impressive debut at the 2009 Rocky Mountain Audio Fest, the young audio company has drawn from hi-fi critics and enthusiasts the sort of rave reviews typically reserved for the most respected brands.

With the LCD-2s, Lefsetz rediscovers his music collection, hears new details in old favorites, and is transported to the recording studio, where he emotionally connects with artists and producers. Of "So Little Time to Fly," from Spirit's 1969 album, Clear (CD, Epic/Legacy 65002), Lefsetz writes: "It's the bass! You can hear it. As for Randy California's vocal . . . you can see him alone in the studio, singing. You can see the mixer grinning as he adds the final touches. All the elements separate, they're clearly defined. It's like putting on glasses after a lifetime of presbyopia." Lefsetz sounds like an audiophile.

He's right, too. At the moment, I'm listening to "So Little Time to Fly." Listen with me, if you like. You don't have to own a copy of the recording; you can find it, and pretty much everything else, for free on the Internet. I'm listening via YouTube, and at around 1:27, it sounds as if the guitarist (Randy California?) slides into a wrong note. Fortunately, the rest of the band holds steady. The bassist (Mark Andes?) is particularly rock-solid. Without him, I figure the song would sound like a disjointed mess.

Speaking of bass: When discussing today's popular headphones, it's pretty much impossible to avoid Beats by Dr. Dre. You know this, I know this, Lefsetz knows this. He contrasts the Audeze LCD-2 with the new Beats Studio closed-back headphone, a product so damn good-looking and downright hip that even I want it, sound unheard. "These are not fashion accessories," Lefsetz says of the LCD-2. "Not something you parade around in to demonstrate how hip and fashionable you are. Consider them the anti-Beats."

The anti-Beats? Why must we be so negative? What if you want a high-quality audio accessory that's also an attractive fashion accessory? What if you want something that demonstrates how hip you are? What if you want the same kind of attention received by those who proudly wear Beats? Lefsetz addresses none of this.

He does, however, raise the topic of price. To achieve this level of sound quality—"the most fantastic listening experience you'll have all year," Lefsetz says—you'll have to spend $1145. "But it's worth it!"

Again, Lefsetz is right. I've held the beautifully built LCD-2s in my hands, placed their luscious leather earpads over my lucky ears, enjoyed the glorious sound they make. The LCD-2s are worth the money, sure, but who has that kind of money to spend on headphones? I don't. My friends don't. I suspect most average consumers don't.

Lefsetz nevertheless makes a valiant attempt to justify the LCD-2s' high price, while also addressing the high-end audio industry's inability to attract a wider audience: "The problem is too much of this expensive stuff is purchased by tweaks who are more into the gear than the music. They quote specs and tech and your eyes glaze over and you move on."

Lefsetz almost sounds like Tinwoman, Avoider of Audiophiles, whom Art Dudley vivisects in this issue's "As We See It." Audiophiles, Tinwoman generalizes, do not listen to music, only to gear. (And she says that as if it's a bad thing!) Lefsetz's tweakers are Tinwoman's audiophiles. Lefsetz and Tinwoman are right and wrong. I agree that many hi-fi enthusiasts are more interested in the gear itself than in the music the gear is intended to reproduce, but I don't blame them for hi-fi's limited appeal. It's their money—they can spend it however they please, just as they can discuss whatever topics they please. Why should their healthy interest in technical specifications deter my desire to hear exciting music beautifully reproduced?

Lefsetz continues: "There aren't enough music fanatics exposed to this great stuff and spreading the word. . . . So I'm just making you aware of these Audezes."

With that, he almost redeems himself. I absolutely agree that too few music lovers have been exposed to true high-fidelity sound. In making more people aware of the Audeze LCD-2s, Bob Lefsetz has done a service to the high-end audio industry, hi-fi enthusiasts, and music lovers; but in focusing on one very esoteric and exclusive product, he has also missed an opportunity to introduce his readers to more versatile and affordable options, like the Skullcandy Aviator ($149.99), B&W P3 ($199.99), and Harman/Kardon CL ($199.99). In fact, he almost makes it sound as if you have to spend $1000 to enjoy a true high-quality listening experience.

"Do I expect you to spend a grand?" he writes. "No. But you should."

I neither expect you to spend $1000 nor think that you should. Unless, of course, you want to. It's your money. But I do want you to know this: In between the wildly fashionable but underachieving Beats Studio and the sonically spectacular but unapologetically inconvenient Audeze LCD-2, there exists an entire world of worthwhile headphones. Some of them actually look as good as they sound. They are free from enormous wooden earcups that require regular oiling. They can be taken with you wherever you go. You might even be able to afford them.

Allow me to make you aware of the PSB M4U 2 and Sennheiser Momentum over-the-ear headphones.

PSB M4U 2 noise-canceling headphones
Why, after 40 years of designing and building loudspeakers, has PSB (footnote 1) entered the headphone market? When I visited him at Canada's National Research Council facility in Ottawa, in May 2012, PSB's chief engineer, Paul Barton, explained that he was working to bring his knowledge of loudspeaker engineering to the relatively new and fast-growing world of portable hi-fi.

In the M4U 2 ($399.99), Barton has designed closed-back, circumaural, noise-canceling headphones with a 40mm dynamic driver in each earcup. The M4U 2 uses PSB's Room Feel equalization technology, designed to produce an open, three-dimensional sound similar to what one might experience when listening to high-end speakers in a typical listening room.


"The experience we have with sound reproduction using loudspeakers in-room has helped to shape our performance targets for headphones," Barton recently explained via e-mail. "Understanding the relationship of speakers and room interaction is important when you use headphones to listen to music intended for playback on loudspeakers in a room. Isn't this the music that most people are listening to on headphones?"

I'm not sure. I suspect that most of today's pop, rock, hip-hop, and R&B—and even much post-punk and experimental music—is recorded to sound good through headphones. "M4U" stands for Music for You. But who is You, exactly? Younger music enthusiasts, I suspect—those who've grown up on MP3s and iTunes, but who nevertheless care deeply about music and who have at least a casual interest in sound quality.

According to Barton, market and lifestyle trends dictated the M4U 2's overall look and feel: "We wanted a little fashion and a good-quality build for the person on the go." Like so many of today's headphones, the M4U 2 physically resembles Beats' ubiquitous Studio model: expandable headband; foldable, high-gloss, polycarbonate frame (available in white, black, or red); large, well-cushioned earpads. David Farrage, of the design firm DF-ID, is responsible for all of this.

The M4U 2s are indeed sturdy and very well built; they're also big and bulky. Out of the box and with the headband fully contracted, they measure approximately 7.5" W by 8" H by 2.75" D and weigh about 12oz. When I wear them, the distance between the outer planes of the earcups increases to 9.5", making me feel like an astronaut or bobblehead doll. While Barton admits that some listeners might prefer a smaller headphone, his general feeling is that an audio component's visual design must not impede its sound. "For PSB, form and function must be in perfect balance."

Although the PSBs are designed to look fashionable, their large size (and my own insecurity) kept me from wearing them in public. Nevertheless, the soft earpads easily accommodated my ears, and the headphones themselves always felt very comfortable on my head. (The average human ear measures 2.5" from top to bottom; the PSB's earpad exceeds that by about 1.25".) I could easily listen for hours without feeling any sort of pain or discomfort.

Footnote 1: PSB Speakers International, 633 Granite Court, Pickering, Ontario L1W 3K1, Canada. Tel: (905) 831- 6555. Web:

MikeMercer's picture

NICE Stephen!

It took alot of back-n-forth w/ Bob Lefsetz on the Audeze's to get him to listen! I had to tell him that, as a fellow HD800 user (he owns a pair) he was in for a whole other level of sonic engagement!! Plus a few friends bombarded him too.

He's a good guy - always makes time to respond when advice is needed - and he's as direct as you would imagine! It was KILLER to advise him on something!!


LOVE those PSB cans too!

JR_Audio's picture

Have you recognized, that with this PSB cans, the mechanical vibration from one ear cup at one side transfers directly via mechanical path to the other side ear cup.

This drove me crazy. I have had them for just one day and sold it again.

And this is also with music. When I heard an instrument basically in one channel, I heard a mechanical ringing of that instrument also in the other channel.

The same goes with the mechanical noises of the cable, which creaps from one side to the other.

Otherwise to tonal balance was fine, but I couldn't live with the mechanical behavior.


Stephen Mejias's picture

Hi Juergen.

Interesting. I didn't experience that at all. I actually found them very well-behaved in that regard.

Stephen Mejias's picture

Hello again, Juergen.

John Atkinson just came over and we conducted another quick test.  With the PSBs on my ears, JA tapped one earcup and asked if I could hear the tapping resonate in the other earcup.  I couldn't.  However, with one earcup in place over my left ear and the other earcup propped against the right side of my head, I could definitely hear the tapping resonate from one earcup to the other.

JR_Audio's picture

Hi Stephen, Hi John, thank you for re-investigate on the mechanical crosstalk on the PCB can.

After the review of Tyll (Hertsens) @Innerfidelity on the NAD VISO HP50 I bought the NAD (as I also bought the Sennheiser Momentum after the review of Tyll). The tonal Balance of the NAD is good but for me just slightly on the warm side and I miss a bit of resolution (compared to the Denon AH-D5000 that I still have, or the Beyer DT-150, that I also have (only to menation some closed cups).

So I read, that the PSB should sound similar but with a bit more treble, and so I ordered it. From the moment on, I took the PSB on my head I realized, that every tough on the head “band”, does creep into my ears (also the mechanical cables noises).

Before I started listening to music I play always my channel check and phase check files (you have those also on your stereophile test CD, (I use the pretty old Denon Test CD tracks for that)) and when the male voice is telling me “left channel”, I do hear it in the left channel, but what surprises me a lot, I hear it also transferred via mechanical resonances of the head band in my right ear (with very strange ringing and coloration).

I own about 12 to 15 headphones, but never had this badly decoupled mechanical behavior between the head band and the couples. Maybe I have had a “monday production unit”, who knows. But as I mentioned above, I sold it straight the next day.

Looking forward seeing you both in about 3 weeks in Las Vegas.


Glotz's picture

As in 'Skeezy'.

Makes me feel less old. 


Lefsetz is so wrong about music freaks who buy nice audio gear, I wanna punch him...  for Xmas.


Merry Christmas! 

blueingreen48's picture

Wow. I just read an article in Stereophile that references a 1000 dollar world class component and the author thinks it costs too much. This is Stereophile right?

rrstesiak's picture

That's my only rant. These are NOT "Entry Level" cans. Love and lust after them I do; but not anywhere near "budget". I settled on B&W Pm5 Series 2, for $300....IMHO "Entry Level".

Perhaps I missed your editorial subtle points and are merely using these headphones as a reference to speak to truly Entry Level headphones; nevertheless I found a picture of them at the very beginning of this article misleading.

Respectfully Keeping It Real,