CH Precision M1.1 power amplifier Page 2

A series of small, vertically stacked pushbuttons adjacent to the generously sized color LED screen controls all functionality and adjustability. It's a complicated but logically arranged menu system, made easier to use if you're familiar with the similar ones used in the company's other products, including the CH Precision P1 phono preamp, which I own. In most cases, setup will no doubt be performed by the dealer, though it's still a good idea to understand and learn the menu system. A virtual meter monitors power output.

The M1.1's maximum gain can be adjusted in 0.5dB steps over a 24dB range, to better match loudspeaker sensitivity and room size. And, as noted above, when the amp is used in bi-amping mode, gain for each driver segment can be independently adjusted. The amp's output stage can be adjusted in 10% steps to change the percentage of global vs local feedback, from 0% local-only feedback to 100% global-only feedback; this allows users to control the amplifier's damping factor to precisely fine-tune bass performance and can be done on the fly, either from the front panel or, once the amp is network-connected, via CH's Android-based app.

Of course, the amount of feedback dialed in by the user also affects total harmonic distortion, which can go from less than 0.1% (with 0% global feedback) to less than 0.01% (with 100% global feedback). Signal/noise ratio is claimed to be an excellent 115dB.

The instruction manual for this engineering tour-de-force includes pages of eye-glazing menu trees. Fortunately, most end users will never have to hack their way through those forests. I consulted with CH's American representative Ralph Sorrentino, and we chose monaural configuration, which the instructions say is "optimal for low impedance speakers requiring large amounts of current"—which well describes the Wilson Audio Specialties Alexx, loudspeakers—and we began with 20% global feedback. I found that more than 20% global feedback made the bass sound overly tight and constricted somewhat the musical flow of my system; less than 20% feedback pushed the sound beyond liquid, into a place that bordered on being soggy: Sorrentino's suggested 20% proved ideal. I ran the M1.1's using their balanced inputs.

I've grown accustomed to your pace
For review purposes, the best way to approach a comparison between a brand-new, highly refined, high-priced, high-performance amp and one with similar qualities that also happens to be your reference of many years—in my case, the darTZeel NHB-458—is to imagine you're never going back to the latter: Pretend you're hooking up with someone new after the break-up of a long-term relationship.

Immediate, direct comparisons are self-defeating. Again, as with significant others, it's best to just go with the new experience and enjoy (or not) your new partner on their own terms.

619ch.2

Though the M1.1s weren't brand-new, I let them break in for 24 hours using the Swim mode (continuous, random music selection) of my Sooloos server. Due to review-scheduling issues, I had the amps here for an unusually long time: By the time I started writing, I knew their character well, and I'd become accustomed to interacting with them, comfortably so—as in any successful long-term relationship.

At this price point, there ought to be much to like—and nothing to dislike—about a product, and that was the case with the suave, muscular-sounding M1.1s. After some experimentation, it also turned out that the CH amps sounded better plugged directly into the wall socket and not (surprisingly) into AudioQuest's Niagara 7000 AC power conditioner— and I preferred AudioQuest's Dragon silver-conductor speaker cables to TARA Labs' Omega SP: points I return to below.

On the spectrum of bright/fast/lean/analytical vs warm/slow/rich/forgiving, the M1.1s were slightly on the latter side, just as the darTZeels are slightly on the former—but neither one veers far from the middle. (Oops: I promised not to compare my new date to my "ex"—but you probably know how that goes!)

The M1.1s' powerful bass grip and remarkable slam were immediately noticeable on guitarist Anthony Wilson's easy-to-recommend self-released Songs and Photographs (Goat Hill GHR-005). As co-producer Joe Harley quipped when I first told him how much I enjoyed the record's bottom end, "Jay [Bellerose] really likes to hit that kick drum hard!"

And boy, does he ever, especially on tracks like "Song From a Dream." Yet through the M1.1s, the impressive weight was accompanied by precise attack, generous but well-controlled sustain, and rapid decay, so the well-textured drum sound surprised me as it should have—like a depth charge—without sounding overripe, losing its grip, or hanging around too long. Each kick drum hit moved notable amounts of air—more than I remember hearing or feeling with my former partner.

That album was among the first I played after installing the CH Precision amps. The overall presentation—strong bottom yet well-articulated transients on Wilson's guitar—had me pulling out other records with noticeably powerful bass, like Ella Fitzgerald Sings the Rodgers and Hart Song Book (ORG/Verve MG VS-64022), recorded in stereo in 1956. There's a powerful and surprising kick drum on the playful "You Took Advantage of Me," and through the M1.1s, it didn't disappoint.

Ella's vocals, probably recorded using a "tippy"-sounding ribbon microphone, took on a smoother, creamier tonality than I expected, combined with an enjoyably solid, three-dimensional vocal image. The slightly edgy string sound—surely a product of those same mikes—had a sweeter, more sonorous luster than I'd expected: That, too, was a pleasant surprise.

From there it was on to the superb Electric Recording Company reissue of Elgar's Cello Concerto with soloist Jacqueline Du Pré and Sir John Barbirolli conducting the LSO (EMI/ERC ASD 655/ERC 044). Here's where the M1.1s demonstrated the sort of rich, generous midrange I associate more with tube amps than with solid-state ones. Yet that richness didn't obscure the clarity of the bow strikes, or the juxtaposition of the cello's solid, three-dimensional image in front of the equally well-presented orchestra. And when the brass entered on the orchestra's dramatic first statement of the heart-tugging theme, they had sufficient metal bite to sound convincing.

Some solid-state amps known for sweetness and an overall warm presentation can sound muffled and overly smooth in passages where the recording or instrumentation calls for bite and edge. In my system, the M1.1s produced a generally warm picture (compared to my ex), but they never sounded muffled, nor did I ever long for tone-control correction to shine light on familiar reference recordings. Instead, I fully enjoyed a subtle shift in tonal perspective in which acoustic guitars had more body and less string-transient sound, and handclaps had more flesh and less slap—just two examples.

More to the point, some amplifiers that veer toward the warm and smooth side of the sonic continuum can produce boredom by softening transients, and sometimes by obscuring inner detail in a pleasant fog. The M1.1s never went there. You'd be sure of that if you'd been with me to hear them play Binaural Baroque, a direct-to-disc binaural recording by the Locrian Ensemble of London (Chasing the Dragon VALDC005). While binaural is best enjoyed via headphones, the presentation through my Wilson Audio Specialties Alexx loudspeakers, driven by the M1.1s, was vividly three-dimensional, especially the Vivaldi Guitar Concerto, which placed guitarist Morgan Szymanski solidly and convincingly in front of the ensemble.

Did the presentation on that Elgar recording, and on other exceptional-sounding, minimally miked recordings, lose a bit of hall reverberation and air, compared to what I was used to? Yes, slightly so—but other attractive sonic qualities were gained in the trade-off.

And there it is: trade-off—a theme to which my mind repeatedly returned throughout the review period, as I played familiar records and digital files. Something was lost, something else was gained. And you can be sure that theme re-emerged when I returned my reference amps to the system and again played some of these same recordings.

The M1.1s excelled at making extra rhythmic sense of even very familiar recordings, perhaps in part because they seemed, in a very positive way, to slow down the presentation's pace, which tended to reveal more musical intent (don't try to measure that!), without creating a sense of sluggishness. Musical events and notes seemed to linger longer, without overstaying their welcome, and when the music called for extra force and weight, the M1.1s delivered.

Why do some amps sound fast and others slow? I don't know, but the ones that are too fast tend to slide across the action, missing the musical crevices, while the ones that are too slow get stuck and fall into them. For its part, the M1.1s dug deeply into the musical action, well-paced and with confident but not excessive grip, and they moved with sufficient speed to deliver rhythm'n'pacing excitement on recordings in all musical genres.

I think you get the rhythmic picture—and the tonal picture: the M1.1s took bright-sounding recordings to a better tonal space, while escorting well-balanced ones to a richer, often more satisfying place.

On the other hand, inevitably, somewhat warm and soft recordings tended to get hopelessly lost in a warm ooze—which is why I preferred these amps when plugged directly into the wall, instead of the AudioQuest Niagara AC conditioner, and when connected to the Wilson Alexxes with AudioQuest Dragons instead of the TARA Labs Omega SP speaker cables. The Niagara 7000 pairs well with the darTZeel amps, as do the transparent but slightly warm TARA Labs cables. But for whatever reason or reasons, plugging the M1.1s into the Niagara took the warm, rich overall presentation to a darker and softer place, as did the TARA Omega SPs. It was a place where the system didn't need to go. (People who claim that cables and AC conditioning don't make a difference are foisting upon the gullible their own brand of snake oil: Regardless of how much or how little you spend, system satisfaction depends on correct cable and conditioner choices!)

I've heard and reviewed such cooler sounding (and costly) powerhouse amplifiers as the big Moon by Simaudio 888 monoblocks—amps that deliver greater spatial resolution, and put more speed and sparkle in the air, but that deliver those plusses at the expense of image solidity, textural generosity, and a fully expressed harmonic palette. As with the cable and power conditioner choices described here, those qualities can be addressed with associated component choices—but it's best to choose a component that, straight out of the box, comes close to your sonic ideal. As the M1.1s did for me.

Conclusion
CH Precision's powerful M1.1 is a superbly engineered and built amplifier that can be configured for use in a variety of ways, and in a variety of systems. As I noted above, the review pair remained in mine for a longer than usual time: Once I'd acclimated to their sonic characteristics and, in particular, come to enjoy how they express musical emotion and convey musical meaning, I was content to let them play for as long as possible.

Yes, a $104,000 pair of monoblocks exists on a rarified plane, but for those who can afford it, and who are looking to move up or even sideways, the M1.1 is well worth considering: It can carry a tune and dance without stepping on its own toes—just take care, during the install, that it doesn't crush yours!

COMPANY INFO
CH Precision
ZI Le Trési 6D
1028 Préverenges
Switzerland
(41) (0)21-701-9040
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
jeffhenning's picture

Another amp that costs more than a sports car that does not offer anything close to state of the art performance.

Disappointing.

Michael Fremer's picture

Of "state of the art"? Mine is: "a seriously mis-used and meaningless cliché used by lazy people."

jeffhenning's picture

So I'm getting flamed by a guy who thinks you need to spend $5K on each power chord to have a good sounding system.

Given your history of thoroughly misguided and erroneous "journalism" (which, in your case, the term is used very generously), having you slag me is a sign that I'm not wrong.

What I consider "state of the art":

• Amps that produce at least 20dB less distortion and noise than this overpriced brick

• That list, to my knowledge, has only two entries: amps by Benchmark and Devialet

• I'm confident that whatever Bruno Putzeys & Peter Lyngdorf are about to release from Purifi Audio will be way better than this cinderblock as well

• Also, all of these superior products are a fraction of the cost of this lead bar

Fremer, you are definitely that guy that would buy a Bugatti Veyron rather than an Acura NSX or purchase a $10K analog Rolex when a $400 Citizen, solar powered, digital watch keeps better time.

Perfect_sense_audio's picture

Based on what criteria exactly? Did you experience these amplifiers at all?

Ortofan's picture

... sound quality of this amp when powered through a "Best Buy grade" Audioquest power conditioner. Surely anyone who reads - let alone writes for Stereophile - knows that he should have been using a power conditioner from Synergistic Research.
https://www.stereophile.com/content/synergistic-research-powercell-ac-conditioner-mcintosh-mc462-amp-elac-adante-speakers

Now bring on the 350W/ch Rotel RB-1590:
http://www.rotel.com/product/rb-1590
It's much lighter on both your wallet and your toes.

Bogolu Haranath's picture

Rotel RB-1590 doesn't have user adjustable feed-back controls :-) .........

Bogolu Haranath's picture

MF liked the way D'Agostino Momentum mono-blocks sounded ....... Momentum has similar output impedance as CH precision, when 20% feed-back is used ........ That output impedance is also close to the output impedance of darTZeel NHB-458 amp :-) ..........

Bogolu Haranath's picture

CH precision is smart ....... They know that 'one size fits all' approach may not be a good idea ....... So, they provide user adjustable feed-back controls :-) ........

Bogolu Haranath's picture

BTW ..... Pass labs SIT-3 ($4,000) also has somewhat similar 0.25 to 0.26 Ohm output impedance :-) ........

Archimago's picture

Yeah, I think CH has hit on an interesting feature that audiophile might like. Sort of like letting listeners choose between a range of digital filters from minimum phase to linear. Although this of course will result in more audible differences than otherwise decent digital filters at the edge of audibility.

The problem here I hope is that it does not demonize negative feedback as something "bad" (which IMO it isn't). If some people are OK with the higher harmonic distortion including elevated higher order distortions and higher output impedance (with commensurate lower dampening factor), then so be it.

But let's just make sure to frame this as a "subjective choice" rather than making it some kind of simplistic audiophile "myth" causing all kinds of companies to follow a trend of low negative feedback when there's typically no reason to...

ok's picture

..it's not theory but implementation that matters.

Bogolu Haranath's picture

Agreed :-) ........

Bogolu Haranath's picture

Wish more audiophile companies could do what CH Precision is doing less expensively :-) ........

Glotz's picture

that this amp is State of the Art in many areas of performance.

Many reviews from respected magazines with experienced reviewers can attest.

Instead the posts show misanthropic assumptions of equipment none of us have heard.

Ortofan's picture

... exceed the performance of the $4K Benchmark AHB-2 (operating in bridged mode)?

Glotz's picture

and listen... Only then would you know where and how the amp compares.

The review should be insightful regarding sound quality.

Perhaps you could ask MF to compare them in a follow-up.

Or you could read the several, other reviews on the web and guess.

Or you could do none of the above, and just speculate wildly and assume everyone is lying to you.

Ortofan's picture

... the CH Precision M1.1 is "State of the Art in many areas of performance."
Again, which MANY areas of performance would those be as compared to the Benchmark AHB2?
For your reference:
https://www.stereophile.com/content/benchmark-media-systems-ahb2-power-amplifier-measurements

Glotz's picture

My statement was a rebuttal of your assertion.

Read the reviews and you tell me... I already read them. lol..

Michael Fremer's picture

Really think measurements tell you how things sound? On the basis you'd not be listening to vinyl.

Ortofan's picture

... sound storage and playback via analog disc, then you must have a preference for a less flat frequency response, degraded speed accuracy and pitch stability, higher levels of distortion and worse signal-to-noise ratio, along with the presence of random impulse noises, as compared to a digital system.

JRT's picture

In a large active system, bridgeable Benchmark AHB-2 can provide clean linear output with wide bandwidth, fully adequate for powering the tweeters. If DIY is of interest, consider the Neurochrome Modulus-686.

Below tweeter frequencies... Bandwidth is obviously constrained at lower frequencies, and class D is fully adequate, and the inefficiency of class A/B is not justified. In that range, look at ATI 5xxNC family of amplifiers which use Hypex NC500 amplifier modules.

For the subwoofer subsystem, I would suggest class H pro-grade fan cooled amplifiers, and would suggest replacing the cooling fans with suitable very quiet running Noctua fans. Class H is similar to class A/B in the output stage, with tight control provided by a large dose of negative feedback, but modulates switch mode power supply output rail voltage to follow the input signal, keeping it a little above a level that would otherwise clip the output when operating within design range. So it is much more efficient than class A/B. The downside is that bandwidth is lower than is achievable with conventional class A/B.

Horses for courses, etc.

David Harper's picture

I guess some people just have too much money.Considering the state of the world today anyone who buys this amp will have some explaining to do when he goes to meet his maker.

ACranston's picture

I'm sure there are a lot of dirt poor people in 3rd world countries who could look at your possessions and your lifestyle and say the same about you. Take your "holier than thou" attitude elsewhere.

David Harper's picture

nope

Glotz's picture

He's worried about God judging him? For spending money on the stuff that gives him joy and happiness? Right.

misterc59's picture

Well said ACranston

Regards,
Terry

Michael Fremer's picture

That is among the most foolish comments yet. No one need apologize for owning this amp, or any high performance, high quality product. Should Ferrari owners apologize? Where do you draw the line? Grow up.

dial's picture

Always class AB, like in the 20th century. Does D sound so bad ?
For asking price, well, you must accept people thinking it's too much (or not), that it's money not well spent, it's the capitalist system (package sold with democrazy), has to do with freedom of speech (no ?).

Bogolu Haranath's picture

MF did not quite like the sound of Boulder 2150 mono-block power amps (Stereophile Class-A) ....... 2150 has very low output impedance and very high damping factor ....... 2150 also has almost 20-Bit resolution (SNR) :-) .........

Ortofan's picture

... why not get a Nagra?
https://www.nagraaudio.com/product/nagra-hd-amp/

Bogolu Haranath's picture

That would be a 'bravura' effect :-) .........

Bogolu Haranath's picture

Both CH Precision and Nagra are located in the Swiss 'Watch Valley' :-) ..........

Bogolu Haranath's picture

darTZeel is also, Swiss made :-) ........

Next MF is gonna review the latest darTZeel NHB-468 monoblock amps :-) .......

blang11's picture

The comments section beneath many Stereophile articles are consistently hijacked by a vocal minority of judgmental, know-it alls that simply can't summon the capacity to stifle their negative rantings. I, for one, vote to turn off comments. Another one of my favorite audio review sites did it, and the world just kept on spinning. I would be surprised if Stereophile hasn't considered doing this already. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts in an "As We See It" one of these days.

ok's picture

..simply refuses to get into the comment section; I guess they call it a smartphone for a reason.

John Atkinson's picture
ok wrote:
My android phone simply refuses to get into the comment section; I guess they call it a smartphone for a reason.

The mobile version of the Stereophile website doesn't show comments.

John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile

Bogolu Haranath's picture

Idee intelligente :-) .........

JRT's picture

First, thank you for providing the comments section.

In writing this comment, I am using a Chrome browser on Android, and the comment section becomes available by selecting the desktop site in the pull-down menu in Chrome. As you explained, the comment section is unavailable in the mobile version.

I would suggest that if anyone does not want to read the comments, then perhaps they shouldn't. They always have the option of not reading the comments, regardless which browser they might be using.

JRT's picture

I like reading the comments, and sometimes adding my own comments.

Ortofan's picture

... a pair of CH Precision M1.1 amps OR a pair of Luxman B-1000f amps - plus a BMW Z4.
https://www.stereophile.com/content/luxman-b-1000f-monoblock-power-amplifier
https://onahighernote.com/shop/stock-open-box-sales/electronics/luxman-b-1000f-monoblock-ex-demo/
http://www.luxman.co.jp/product/b-1000f

Bogolu Haranath's picture

....... or, a Corvette convertible :-) .........

Bogolu Haranath's picture

Invasion of the 'know-it-alls' :-) ............

Bogolu Haranath's picture

May be Stereophile could come up with an 'app' for the comments section ....... So, people who don't want to read the comments, could turn off the 'app' :-) ...........

X