Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
thank you again Mr Halberstadt for another brilliant column!
We readers are lucky to have your wonderful words
The thing that surprised me most is that despite the tweaksor maybe because of themhis hi-fi sounded pretty terrific.
The author's listening room may be an extreme case of tweakery run amok. Yet components like cables, stands, and power conditioners can play a big role in shaping our listening experience, and they seem to cause the most online dust-ups. So in this column I'd like to talk about how these secondary but still fascinating items have worked in my hi-fi and discuss my experiences with two recently arrived productsone of which is certain to strain some readers' credulity.
For nearly 10 years, I've kept my gear on racks from Brooklyn's Box Furniture Co (footnote 1). I like Anthony Abbate's work because it doesn't resemble the kind of thing you'd see in a server farm or a military installation. Made by hand using mortise and tenon joints, real hardwoods, and no more embellishment than absolutely required, it is beautiful in the manner of actual furniture in a real human home. Abbate doesn't get too specific about the materials he uses inside the shelves, but they make my components sound terrific and never interfere with the music.
For most of this time, I've enjoyed Box Furniture's maple four-shelf rack and amplifier stand; sonically, they provided a vast upgrade over the cheap and ready Target Audio rack I'd used for ages. Then about a year ago I inherited a friend's Boxa double-wide, three-shelf model in walnutwhich allowed me to place two turntables side by side. I found it to sound a little richer, more colorful, and just plain better than the taller maple stand; I suspect this is due to the more stable footprint. The maple stand now keeps gear in for review off the floor and continues to look marvelous.
Racks aside, I've had scant success, or just rotten luck, with vibration-control devices. It's certainly not for lack of trying. As a much younger man, I once placed two computer keyboardtype wrist pads, each about the size of a turkey sub, under my EAR 859 integrated amp. When I gave the amp a push, it jiggled reassuringly. Sitting down to listen, I heard an improvement that was, literally, stunning: a massive expansion of the soundfield, more detail and texture, faster transients, and a smoother, more musical personality. I felt like a genius, but only for another day. That's how long it took for the memory gel in the pads to compress to their new shape under the amplifier and for the benefits to evaporate.
Ever since, I've listened to dozens of pods, pucks, cones, roller balls, and platforms, hoping to be amazed. I've found all of them to change the sound, but, alas, rarely entirely for the better. When I read comments by people who think this hobby comes down to little more than confirmation bias, I sometimes wish they were right. Over the course of my listening life, I've had some success placing Black Diamond Racing cones under a Rega Planar 3, and for a while I flirted with Cardas Myrtlewood blocks, which effected a modest improvement under certain components. The only device that has remained in my system is a quartet of IsoAcoustics Orea Bordeaux footers, which live under my Garrard 301 and its lovely Box Furniture Co. plinth. With the Oreas, I perceive a slightly larger soundstage and a little less smearing; these changes are consistently audible but in no way dramatic. I will keep looking for other vibration-control devices, but discouragement is setting in.
Happily, I feel nothing but enthusiasm for the Dr. Feickert Analogue Universal Alignment Protractor, a device that I believe to be Germany's greatest contribution to culture since Klaus Nomi. Compared to the plastic Dennesen Sountracktor it replaced, the all-metal Feickert is just as simple to use and far less fiddly: Once you find the tonearm's pivot point and tighten everything, you're basically done. Nothing moves or flexes, and the markings are as precise as you'd wish for. Thank you to Michael Trei for the recommendation.
My eyes and I are in our 50s, and to make sure I can see the cartridge's stylus during alignment, I rely on a large, illuminated magnifier, the kind with a handle and LED lights that folks with dodgy eyesight use to read the menus at IHOP. (It's listed on Amazon as the MagniPros Patented 6X Rechargeable Magnifying Glass and sells for $24.65.) It works well, as does the generic stylus force gauge, regrettably also bought on Amazon, that costs as much as a latte in midtown Manhattan. In the same it-just-works category are the AudioQuest antistatic record brush and the Audio Technica AT607a stylus cleaning fluid, which I apply not directly to the cartridge, as the how-to video advises, but to a stylus brush.
Since writing about it for this column, I've continued cleaning records with the Degritter Mk. II. After a year of use, it remains one of the most enjoyable audio devices I've had in my home, and with occasional water changes and filter cleanings, it's as effective as ever at making LPs less noisy and more fun to listen to. Using it stills feels decidedly upscale, sort of like cleaning records in business class. Maybe the Degritter should come with a half-bottle of Bollinger and a bowl of warm cashews.
As Michael Trei pointed out in a recent column, ultrasonic machines lacking a rinse cycle can leave a thin layer of residue on the record, and I've found the Degritter guilty of this, too. Playing a freshly Degritted record sometimes leaves a bit of gunk on the stylus (which is easily enough removed). So when I'm feeling patient enough, I subject the records to a second cleaning in my VPI HW-16.5 vacuum machine, which is getting old enough to drive. With its loud motor and pair of squirt bottles, it's not a lot of fun to use, but it removes the leftover gunk and is absolutely required for really dirty records. LPs lucky enough to go through both machines really do sound fantastic.
Then there's the AudioQuest Niagara 3000, the first power conditioner I haven't hated (footnote 2). I've never gotten on with these devices: In exchange for more silent silences, most tend to compress an amplifier's dynamics. I've always plugged amplifiers into the wall. The Niagara is the first conditioner I've heard that doesn't rob the music of excitement, likely thanks to a feature AudioQuest calls Transient Power Correction: In brief bursts, the two high-current outlets can provide 55A of current to the amplifier, so the voltage does not sag during dynamic peaks. Regardless of the reason, amps I plug into it never sound compressed, rubbery, or otherwise compromised, but they do play considerably quieter. Listening in my 100-year-old converted factory building, I've often been aware of the way the quality of the AC power varied; my hi-fi sounds particularly hashy and gray during New York's long air-conditioner season. After installing the Niagara, there are no more good or bad power days: the hi-fi sounds the same day and night.
The Niagara is the brainchild of AudioQuest's Garth Powell. To my ears, the company's products perform far better since his arrival. Powell also had a hand in the design of the Hurricane and Thunder power cables, which in my system outperform other AC cords I've tried, making components sound so obviously richer and more powerful that just about anyone could hear the difference.
On the other hand, AudioQuest's equally rich-sounding Mythical Creatures interconnects haven't been able to supplant my longstanding favorites from Auditorium 23, which are more transparent, balanced, and musically keen than any I've heard. Sadly, according to importer Jonathan Halpern, Keith Aschenbrenner's little company is no longer in operation.
Footnote 2: AudioQuest, 2621 White Rd, Irvine, CA 92614. Tel: (800) 747-2770. Email: info@audioquest.com Web: audioquest.com
thank you again Mr Halberstadt for another brilliant column!
We readers are lucky to have your wonderful words
This is why I love Stereophile. A great, beautifully written and informative column with a Klaus Nomi reference. Mr. Nomi appearing on SNL in 1979 singing backup for David Bowie (w Joey Arias too) for three songs was a highlight of my gender fluid 19th year. Those clips are available on the web for anyone to see. Truly epic and unique.
Hmm.. I just have a drink. Every drink is worth about $5000 of improvements... but the fifth drink collapses the soundstage into mono...
...as I normally collapse into the pillows of the couch, with one ear buried and the other facing the ceiling... while my body falls into mild delirium tremens.
Just a word of advice about such devices. A little bit helps, a bit too much is counterproduction.. and the next morning you feel the after effects!
"Hmm.. I just have a drink. Every drink is worth about $5000 of improvements..."
It's Voodoo!
Bit like those SR $300 ac "directional"? mains fuses that you can get for 50cent
Cheers george
Pink especially. It's like a new set of components now! Directionality is obvious once you listen for 2 minutes and compare. No going back!
I also applaud Alex on bravely reporting on this $700 unit that most will trash without hearing through first.
You know that baby will work much better with a Stromtank S5000 power supply and a PranaWire Arhat power cord.
Come on, buddy.
The Steinmusic S2 will wipe the floor with this cheap Schumann generator, as well.
with the Stromtank and the Steinmusic in-line IMMEDIATELY!! Anton, you rule!!
I really love the Pink (and Purple) fuses from Synergistic Research.. seriously ear opening if the rest of the gear is basically neutral-sounding. Even with ONE fuse inline to my DAC the difference was 'what the fuck I can't go back for a minute'. Break in was nil, but did sound more refined after a few hours.
And the wrong direction (always a PITA to go back and pry the IEC fuse box open) and re-try and listen. The wrong direction is ABSOLUTELY wrong... Ugggh... phasey and distant and no bass. Just terrible.
And while I really liked the German HiFi Tuning SUPREME fuses for my amp and phono stage... replacing all of my system fuses with SR Pink and Purple.. just way more spacious, clarifying and solid. Like better audio cables, just can't go back.
Hearing Jon Durant's new 'Momentarily' album pre and post SR fuse was an excellent transformation from 'They are there' to 'They are here'.
Weakest link in the chain, people!!
by Glotz:"Directionality is obvious once you listen for 2 minutes and compare. No going back!" (joke yes?)
Yeah you can really hear how directional mains fuses are, especially when the ac mains changes it's direction 60 x a second. You can "really" hear the differences in the sound every 60th of a second.
NOT JUST VOODOO, BUT A FUGASI ALSO.
Cheers George
No directionality. Wasn't designed for it.
SR Fuses and HiFi Tuning? Yes.. they are directional. They were designed that way.
Simple really.
Please state SR's "ohm's/kirchoff's laws" design criteria, on how an AC Mains Fuse is so called "designed" to be directional when it's in series with the active side of the AC mains supply that changes it's phase 180 degrees every 60th of a second. I would love to know, as this is as good as someone inventing "perpetual motion".
Cheers George
or doing the work yourself.
The concept is quantum tunneling!
Knowledge only goes so far with the stubborn. Something happens to the new information- it falls to the ground before it reaches your eyes and your ears.
Proof is in the pudding, my pedantic professor- Do the experiment yourself. I'm sure we all have credit cards... I did, and I heard it observationally- with all of my components.
Kinda like Alex did with his column this month. Trust your ears, man.
Must have been some good "whatever".
We're still waiting for you say how a fuse was "designed that way" to be "directional"? in series with the ac mains.
Was it some voodoo ritual that enabled it to be directional?
BTW: Just saying "Quantum Tunneling" does not cover it
Cheers George
Always happens when those that end up going down that route have nothing with any logic to say.
You and the one with the "pink avatar" should get on like a house on fire.
This mag backs itself up with measurements, the way you two carry on is better suited to the way Absolute Sounds was with only poetic license to express the product. Even they relented to sometimes using "some" measurements these days.
NB: Notice how there's no measurements on this product or those $$$$$ SR Fuses
What measurements are you looking for when it comes to this product or any fuse, hmm?
I find your entire system of thought broken that you would dismiss these products, but then NOT conduct your own tests or measurements BEFORE you state the products are false.
You claim these products are bullshit, but you can't prove otherwise.
The "Poetic license" you speak of is a perfect example of that. You haven't heard products in this magazine like I or other audiophiles have as we go to the shows and store demos consistently to HEAR the exact result of these and other products for ourselves, in the real world, with real equipment, both the expensive and cheap.
It's okay NOT to open your mouth pretending you already have the answers when you don't. Experience it first, dude.
Whoa, let see?? then that would make them a diode!!!
VOODOO and absolute stupidity!!!
And ones that believe it are let see? ho yes! https://tinyurl.com/29hb5ykw
Great article!
I'm not surprised that using the BASS speaker cable on the second set of terminals improved the sound compared to the ZERO speakers and metal jumpers. My experience is that the standard metal jumpers that come with speakers are really terrible sounding. I'm not downplaying the BASS cable's quality by any means, but I've always bi-wired or used proper cable jumpers for this reason when faced with two sets of terminals.