NAD M66 streaming preamplifier

In my early years in audio, I witnessed the rise and fall of the AM-FM receiver, first in vacuum tube mono and later in solid state stereo. Some of them grew to be behemoths, supporting multiple inputs, equalizers, dual speaker zones, and powerful amplifiers. When radio sources receded in popularity and with the rise of CDs, cable TV, and DVD, radio receivers were replaced by A/V receivers in the mainstream market.

Today, the ascension of streaming as the conduit for both audio and video content has nudged these, too, from the center stage. One can stream content from the bewildering variety of products with internet access including cell phones, smart TVs, almost any computer, and of course, dedicated streaming devices from the cheap-and-cheerful to seriously audiophile. If your music is on the web or on a NAS, many of these will let you browse for it, find it, and play it.

Like the M33 integrated amplifier, the NAD M66 is, as is the result of that evolutionary pattern, or a variant of it, integrating sophisticated streaming options with a modern, multiple input/output preamplifier complete with D/A (and A/D) conversion, DSP, bass management, and room correction, not to mention MM/MC phono inputs. It differs from those classic AM-FM receivers, though—and from its predecessor the M33—in offloading amplification to a dedicated amplifier. It also expands the array of inputs, outputs, and features relative to its immediate predecessor (the M33) and its evolutionary forebears.

NAD calls the M66 a DAC-Preamplifier. The DAC portion is implemented with ESS's current flagship DAC chip, the Sabre Pro ES9038PRO, an eight-channel device capable of converting PCM up to 32/768kHz and DSD up to DSD256. In the M66, all eight channels are used for the main L and R stereo, which operate at 24/192 PCM; DSD need not apply. Two additional devices—Texas Instruments PCM5122 stereo DAC chips—are employed for the four subwoofer outputs. Other significant M66 features include a precise resistor-ladder volume control for analog signals and full-spectrum Dirac Live room correction with Bass Control. NAD has also included what they call Dynamic Digital Headroom (DDH). When enabled during D/A conversion, it is said to eliminate distortion due to digital intersample peak clipping ("intersample overs") that can occur with oversampling and sudden high-frequency, high-level transients. This has the potential to render percussion instruments in particular more realistically.

The M66's back panel shows off the range of the M66 as preamplifier/controller. Scanning the connectors from left to right and starting with the digital inputs across the top, we see first two wireless inputs (Bluetooth and Wi-Fi antennas), then HDMI/eARC, LAN, USB, two RCA and two optical (TosLink) S/PDIF, and a single AES3. Below these are the analog inputs: MM Phono and MC Phono on RCA, two pairs of single-ended line inputs on RCA, and one pair of balanced line inputs on XLR. On the right side there are three tiers. The top tier has an RS232 control interface, an IR input, two 12V trigger inputs, and a single 12V trigger output; all the triggers are 1/8" miniplugs. The middle tier has RCA and XLR outputs for four subwoofers. The bottom tier has a pair of RCA and a pair of XLR line-out connectors. To the extreme right is a power block with On/Off switch, an IEC socket, a line fuse, and a grounding post. There are two expansion slots on the extreme left, although it's hard to imagine a pressing need for them.

The front view of the M66 is very clean—deceptively so for a device with so much going on. At the front center of the top panel is the On/Standby button; an illuminated NAD badge on the left side of the front panel turns from amber to white when the power is on. Directly below that is a ¼" headphone jack. On the right is a large, smooth, slightly overdamped volume/control knob. Center stage is a 7" full-color touchscreen that displays album art, track/album information, and volume level, and facilitates basic playback controls (Play, Pause, Forward, Back). The large touchscreen also lets you select an input and access the playback queue and settings menus.

This works great if you sit within arm's reach. Fortunately, there are convenient alternatives, including a remote control (footnote 1), though the most practical and comprehensive is the BluOS app, which can run on a computer or any iOS or Android device. The app readily loaded and played my local library and accessed a reasonably wide array of streaming sites. However, it ignored my DSD/DFF tracks (footnote 2).

I did not have time to become fully comfortable with the BluOS system, but apart from the DSD glitch, it seemed to work fine for music playback. My preference for playing music was Roon, but it was easy to use it along with BluOS for settings. With both loaded on all my devices—my main PC/Server, iPhone, and iPad—I could use whichever device was at hand.

I began using the M66 by connecting its line outputs via balanced (XLR) cables to my Benchmark AHB2 amps, which drove my KEF Blade Two Meta loudspeakers. Later, I added a pair of KEF KC92 subwoofers via two of the RCA sub outputs. In addition to the wired LAN, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth links, I utilized my PC server, which runs both Roon and JRiver, via my Merging Hapi II to make more direct physical connections with both the AES3 digital input and the balanced analog inputs of the M66. For the rare occasions when I needed to spin a silver disc, I plugged my Oppo 103 into the RCA or TosLink inputs. Over the course of the review period, I was able to try many but not all of the M66's physical and network connections.

Straight stereo
Before running Dirac or turning on the subwoofers, I turned on the amps and the M66 and ran through a dozen or so familiar recordings just to get a feel for how things worked and to see (or, rather, hear) if there were any audible surprises. I did this in three ways, running the M66 as a Roon Ready endpoint (via a wired network connection), using Roon to control the music and the Hapi for digital conversion, sending the Hapi's analog output to the M66's balanced analog input, and, finally, by using Roon to send output from the Hapi's AES3 output to the M66's AES3 input.

There were no surprises. When I listened to familiar stuff like Ligeti's Six Bagatelles for Wind Quartet (Harmonia Mundi, 905370DI, 24/96 download) and "Tambourine" from Sol & Pat (Alpha Classics Alpha 757, 16/44.1 PCM download), the instruments, their overall balance, and the soundstage was what I heard when running the D/A output of my Merging Hapi direct to the power amps. The sound was clean with notable delineation of instruments and a nice sense of space appropriate to each recording. This tells me that the DAC in the M66 is superb, and the analog path through the M66 is transparent.

This quality of reproduction was best characterized by a recent recording of Dutillieux's Tout un monde lointain... for cello and orchestra (Victor Julien-LaFerriere, Orch. National de France, David Robertson. 16/44.1 PCM download, Alpha Classics Alpha 886). This is a lovely, vigorous performance served by an equally lovely recording in which the solo cello is up front and just a bit left of center stage, while the orchestra is spread wide and distinctly farther back. The subtle beginning, in which the cellist rubs the strings lightly, is barely audible (as it should be) (footnote 3). Within seconds, its presence becomes quite clear. As the orchestra come in to fill the stage, the distinction between cello and orchestra remains, as clear as it would be from, say, Row G.

I do not think I have previously had an experience like the one I had with the M66, in which three quite different modes of signal transmission and processing proved equally satisfying. It is important to note that, while the M66 does possess an Analog Direct mode, by default this is defeated and the analog input is digitized at 24/96. In Analog Direct, the signal remains analog from input to output.

You might think it reasonable to make Analog Direct (footnote 4) the default setting, but doing so thwarts all DSP functions for the analog inputs. With Analog Direct selected, you cannot use tone controls, bass management, or Dirac Live with those analog inputs. It also eliminates the L/R balance control.

I expected, reasonably I think, that the loss of such functions would be offset by removal of an audible veil or two resulting from redundant A/D/A conversion (footnote 5), but that expectation wasn't met: Exhaustive A/B comparisons failed to crown a winner. I had the consistent impression that the Analog Direct pathway was a little more relaxed and open, but I could not consistently determine whether it was engaged without a direct A/B comparison. Perhaps it matters that all my sources are digital; if you use analog sources, you may have a different experience.

Some of the functions lost with Analog Direct enabled are significant. I don't care about tone controls or Balance, but the loss of Dirac—which, for one thing, is by far the best way to integrate subwoofers—is regrettable.

Turning to the digital inputs: DDH turns out to be a winner. Clipping due to intersample overs is not a new discovery; its cause and its solutions are well documented (footnote 6). It can coarsen treble details with, eg, cymbals or high-brass partials.


Footnote 1: I have little to say about the remote control. Yes, it can control volume, the brightness of the NAD icon, power on/standby, and mute. It can also pause/resume play and advance track forward or back. There is a potentially useful button which, with each push, steps through the five available Dirac filters and Dirac OFF, but there is no display on the RC or the front panel to indicate the current status. (Great for blind tests!) There are 10 programmable buttons for presets, but there is no way, until programmed, for it to select inputs or to remind the user what each button does.

Footnote 2: BluOS does not play DSD/DFF as downloaded or as ripped from SACDs. Its only option is to create, off line, PCM files for playback. I tried it once and it does work.

Footnote 3: At the time I wrote this review, I had not looked at the score and incorrectly identified the "barely audible" opening sounds. After consulting the score, I found that the sound is made by the very gentle brushing of a cymbal and a snare drum and relistening at a very high level clearly confirmed my error. I also checked out several other recordings and, on most, the brushing was either inaudible, unidentifiable or clear but just too loud! The best were this one and another by Xavier Phillips (cello) and the Seattle Symphony led by Ludovic Morlot (SSM1001, 24/96 5.1 download).

Footnote 4: Analog Direct is individually selectable with phono MM, phono MC, line 1, line 2, and balanced inputs.

Footnote 5: When not in Analog Direct, the input is currently digitized to 24/96 by an ESS Sabre ES9822Pro, a two-channel ADC with impressive specs: DNR of 124dB and 117dB of THD+N!

Footnote 6: See benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/application_notes/intersample-overs-in-cd-recordings.

COMPANY INFO
NAD Electronics International
633 Granite Ct.
Pickering
Ontario L1W 3K1, Canada
(905) 831-6555
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
Glotz's picture

And DDH is really intriguing! Needless to say Dirac with your subs is next level as well. The Analog Direct feature seems like a kludge.

Looking forward to the KEF sub reviews as well.

supamark's picture

Quick review:

Goes deep, low distortion, onboard crossover is crap. May have trouble blending with smaller speakers due to distortion mismatch (I think the KEF has active distortion cancellation, or at least DSP that minimizes it). Should have an XLR input, but does not which makes it less flexible in placement - you can run XLR for a mile without noise, maybe 15 to 20 feet with single ended RCAs.

A couple stacks would make for a very good home theater system. Oh, and the cones are really only 7 inches across.

thethanimal's picture

I'm spending the next couple years saving up for a high end DAC-enabled preamplifier. This NAD M66 has been on the list, along with the McIntosh C49 or C53. I thought I had moved the NAD further down, deciding the screen and built-in streaming would become obsolete sooner than the Macs, but your subjective review and John's "superb" measurements put me right back into decision paralysis. Despite the grousing over extremely expensive equipment on this website, we really are spoiled for choice when looking for high end components that the middle class can afford.

Glotz's picture

Truth.

georgehifi's picture

For when it comes down to it, is just a streamer with dac that has volume/eq control and switchable inputs. Should be $2k tops

Cheers George

Ortofan's picture

... NAD C 658.

https://nadelectronics.com/product/c-658-bluos-streaming-dac/

supamark's picture

Not Rotel or Yamaha, and it's the same brand as reviewed! It's not really comparable to the M66 feature-wise, but baby steps.

thethanimal's picture

Your comments are tiresome, George. Why don’t you just post your system with prices, and then from now on we can all just assume that any product reviewed that costs more than the price of your components is no good in George Land. Then we don’t have to read your comments and you don’t have to waste your time to condescend to write them.

georgehifi's picture

Nice one.

supamark's picture

or at least interesting. Nobody cares what you think of squarewaves dude. Also, having now heard an autoformer as a volume control, they're awful. You can easily hear the transformer, yuck. Your gadget isn't an autoformer, is it?

georgehifi's picture

"Nobody cares what you think of squarewaves dude."
That can only come from a voodooist.

" Also, having now heard an autoformer as a volume control, they're awful. You can easily hear the transformer, yuck.Your gadget isn't an autoformer, is it?"
Yeah that shows us your knowledge level on things.

supamark's picture

You really think *anyone* cares about your opinion on squarewaves? Do you even listen to yourself? I mean, you're like an AI with only two responses. It's input, if class D goto X, else goto Y, repeat. X and Y are function calls. Pretty simple algorithm.

Per easily available interwebs (Wikipedia in this case, redirect from autoformer) "In electrical engineering, an autotransformer is an electrical transformer with only one winding." And yeah, its' sound is pretty obvious.

All transformers have a sound, and that sound is dependant upon the metal(s) of which they are made. Any recording engineer can tell you this; we *use* those sound differences, and care about them.

I made a direct comparison with my Pass Labs XP-22 active preamp, btw. VPI 'table, Allnic tube phono pre, some sort of SET amp, Klipsch speakers. I thought the speakers were broken until the autoformer came out and the XP-22 went into the system. Then it sounded pretty darn good. Not my system/house.

Oh, and I notice you never answered the question about your volume control thingy. Maybe it IS an autoformer and you don't like your "lack of clothes" on its' sound being pointed out.

georgehifi's picture

The type that pays $250 "directional" AC mains fuses (that are really re-badged 50c ones)
When their electronic knowledge is next to zero, they can only get personal with negative personal comments.

BTW: just about all with any knowledge know that the Lightspeed Attenuator was LDR based, a far cry from an autoformer, and it was bought out many years ago.

supamark's picture

You sound like those people who cover for their own shortcomings by projecting them onto others.

If you don't think transformers change the sound of music going through them you never could hear worth a lick and your opinions have no worth here. It's literally the main sound of McIntosh amps - their autoformers give them their "chonky" sound (too much low mid for me).

Oh, and every single comment on this forum from you is negative. Even when you see a nice squarewave (btw, are you into trains?) there's always a negative about class D (deserved, but still) thrown in. I guess that means you've been talking out your bum your whole life, and your knowledge of electronics is a bunch of hand-wavy BS. "Hurr durr passive volume rules all because reasons I don't understand. Derp." That's you, and you're incorrect. You didn't even know an autoformer is a type of transformer - I had to tell you.

georgehifi's picture

I comment (good or bad/monitory or measurement) on the products here, I don't start personnel attacks, you and your "mate" animal did, and there lies the rub sunshine.

supamark's picture

A fuse is a fuse, period. Power cords, provided they are of sufficient gauge to transfer power, have zero effect on the sound of an audio system. How could they affect 100+ feet of Romex in the walls? Ain't gonna fix that noisy transformer at the street either. I've said this many times before. I will add that if your home is wired with aluminum, change that crap out ASAP so your home doesn't burn down.

Speaker cables? Yeah, they can make a difference because they alter the electrical parameters of the amp/speaker system.

Glotz's picture

Unless you've already heard their lineup and can say there is no improvement with the Master series, please.

Inflation has fucked up a lot of perceptions for consumers. Speculation is bullshit.

Rather ask the reviewers to procure the gear for a comparison.

David Harper's picture

minimal B.S. as usual from you. Have you listened to the Radio Paradise FLAC stream over internet radio? If so how would you rate the SQ? Equal to CD quality? I listen to it a lot with a Yammy AVR outputting from pre-out to a Vidar amp.

Kal Rubinson's picture

Thanks. AFAIK, I've never listened to Radio Paradise.

DaveinSM's picture

Is it just me, or should I be surprised that such an elaborate DAC/streaming/preamp setup is lacking onboard SSD memory slots/native file playback capability? If so, what a missed opportunity IMO.

This is like the Eversolo DMP-A8 but with less features and at more than double the price.

georgehifi's picture

Will be a good comparison, and you would save $2.5k into the bargain. And looks like the Eversolo could have better measurements too, a full barrage of measurement comparison will no doubt also come on ASR soon.

Cheers George

Kal Rubinson's picture
Quote:

Is it just me, or should I be surprised that such an elaborate DAC/streaming/preamp setup is lacking onboard SSD memory slots/native file playback capability? If so, what a missed opportunity IMO.

Good point but (1) it presumes using BluOS for playback (not for me) and (2) it can be accomplished with an SSD connected by USB.

DaveinSM's picture

Hey Kal- but does an external SDD work that well? Users report that SSDs connected by USB have longer latency in terms of menu/song selections and it doesn’t seem like such a permanent solution to onboard storage(?). It would be convenient in a way to be able to physically remove it to add songs using a computer, then reconnect the external drive… but my experience with removable memory in DAPs is that you have to repopulate the song list in the device from scratch each time you do that. It takes quite some time with thousands of songs even on a 256gb card.

The Eversolos take M2 nvme SSD cards that are inserted directly into memory slots like they would on a computer, and they reportedly behave just like internal memory without any lag or repopulation issues. This to me would be a big deal, especially since I’ll be looking at adding at least 2tb to get my entire music collection on there.

Kal Rubinson's picture

I've actually used an external USB-connected HDD with the M66 when I set it up initially. This is something I do with all "streaming" devices just to be assured that any start-up issues have nothing to do with my network or other components. With the M66, as well as others, my 2Tb test library loaded quickly and was completely responsive.

The setup evolved to using Roon on my PC connected by LAN to my NAS and via LAN to the M66 or using JRiver on my PC connected by LAN to my NAS and via private subnet to the Merging Hapi (or USB to an Okto DAC8) with XLR cables to the M66. Latency was never an issue with a 30Tb library.

georgehifi's picture

Fastest you can get ATM, straight into the PCI Express slot.

Cheers George

X