Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
I used to own an idler turntable; a Thorens TD-124. It was beautifully built and had a big sound that was quite addictive, but it was very capricious in how it functioned from week to week. While the bearing was well made and of high precision, it was never designed for low noise and that in the end was why I got rid of it; the TD-124 was never designed for vertical vibration because mono cartridges were not sensitive to it. I realized that too late after I got it and judging by how many TD-124's I see on the second hand market, perhaps I am not alone. To have improved the table to modern standards would have cost quite a handsome amount, especially if I was going to order parts from Schopper. I read Mr. Dudley's review and thought the same thing, although I have never owned a Garrard, I would assume it's pure idler design vs. the TD-124's hybird design might lend it to becoming quieter for a smaller cash outlay than the Thorens required. I will be interested to see what improvements SME makes with the Garrard and what parts of the table they will improve to bring it to a modern level of performance required today. I still lust after one.
On the topic of tightening, Linn used to always say "Linn tight" I always ignored them when working on my LP-12 - initially because of the stress it created on the parts, but also my firm belief that too much was simply not necessary for any sonic benefit. Glad I am not alone.