Grimm Audio MU2 streaming preamplifier

For several months, my wife and I had been living in a cozy studio apartment in New York's Financial District while our apartment underwent substantial renovations (footnote 1). All the old furniture was sold or donated, and decades of accumulated stuff was subjected to triage (sell, donate, or store). All my audio equipment, parts, and tools suffered the same fate. Downtown, my listening was via pretty decent headphones (B&W Px8, Audeze LCD-XC) connected to a Mytek Brooklyn+ DAC and my PC. Meanwhile, we were very busy shopping to equip the "new" apartment.

I have never really enjoyed headphone listening (and now I know it's likely I never will), so our recent return home was a relief in so many ways. We still have a "punch list" of things we're not satisfied with or that simply have not yet been done. Furniture and other appurtenances arrive on someone else's schedule. And I can't overnight resurrect a complex and evolving audio system with a new wiring arrangement; nor is it trivial for an apartment dweller to find storage space for all the now-empty cartons.

An all-in-one streamer-DAC-preamp would not have held much appeal for me if my old system was up and running. This, however, was a different time, and I was offered the Grimm MU2 for review with ideal timing. I had just unboxed two of the KEF Blade 2 speakers (the third was still stuffed in a shower stall with other paraphernalia), and I thought I knew where the Benchmark amps were in our basement storage shed. All I had to do was scramble for a few cables, and the MU2 would let me turn on the music in my home for the first time since last Thanksgiving.

What's new in the MU2?
While unpacking the MU2 and getting all my ducks in a row, I went back and read John Atkinson's favorable review of the MU1, a task I encourage; doing so will reward readers interested in Grimm's digital technology. Comparing that information with Grimm's documentation for the MU2, we learn that the MU2 is an MU1 streamer with an added DAC and a basic analog "preamp" controller, packaged in the same chassis as the MU1.

A few features of the MU1 have been left out of the MU2, including the digital outputs, since why would a digital player with such a sophisticated DAC need digital outputs? (footnote 2)

The best way to understand what the MU2 adds to the MU1 is the block diagram representing the functions of the MU2, where I have outlined the subset of functional elements carried over from the MU1. Common elements include the digital inputs and the FPGA-based hardware that implements Grimm's "Pure Nyquist" filters (footnote 3). These filters replace standard multistep "on-chip" oversampling filters with FPGA-based, single-step filters running at 128Fs with high precision, supported by a low-jitter master clock.

The major new elements are the "Major DAC," the analog inputs, and the analog preamp functions consisting of input selection, volume control, and output selection.

Major DAC: Seeking a middle ground among multibit, single-bit, and pulse-width modulation digital-to-analog converters, Grimm developed the Major DAC, which seeks to avoid the unique constraints of each. Using an unusual 11th order noise shaper, the FPGA-based DAC employs 1.5-bit architecture with 16 DAC cells per channel, and it feeds a fully symmetrical analog output stage.

Analog Inputs and Input Selection: In addition to streaming and digital inputs, the MU2 offers one stereo pair each of balanced and unbalanced analog inputs. Add the new volume control and you have a capable "preamp" for a modestly sized but uncompromising modern audio system.

Volume Control: A no-compromise, relay-based volume control assures precise level increments and channel balance at all level settings.

Output Switch: This manual switch allows selection between headphone output and main (XLR and RCA) outputs. When the latter are selected, both are active, but since they are both driven by the same output circuitry, Grimm recommends using only one at a time. The switch is toggled with two brief taps on the control disc.

The only visible evidence of these changes is on the back panel of the MU2, which obviously is different; otherwise, the MU2 is identical to the MU1 except for the color of the does-everything control disc on top, which is now brushed silver instead of bronze.

Regarding that rear panel: On the left, the USB port is above the Ethernet RJ45 port; next, the S/PDIF (on RCA) input is above the TosLink input. Next to that is a single AES3 input, a stereo pair of balanced analog outputs—all XLR—and then four RCA jacks, one pair analog in, the other analog out. Above that is the 6.3mm headphone jack. Finally, on the right, is an IEC power connector, above which is the master power button and a 3.5mm socket for an IR remote sensor (footnote 4).

Out of the box and into my life
The Grimm MU2 is easy to set up considering its sophistication. It comes with a small manual, but I simply put it on a shelf, plugged it in, and connected it to my local network with an Ethernet cable and to my Benchmark AHB2 amplifiers with a pair of XLR cables. Since I had not accessed my NAS (where all the music resides) in months, I also plugged in a portable USB drive with about 2TB of audio files, just to get started.

Did I mention that the MU2 can serve as a Roon server?

After power-up, I went to my iPad, opened up Roon Remote—new users will need to download it—and accessed the MU2's Roon Core, already installed. Setting it up took me only a minute or two, since I've done it many times, but the simple steps illustrated in the Quick Start Manual should get anyone through in less than 10 minutes. You will need a Roon account, and you'll want to give Roon access to your Tidal and/or Qobuz accounts, if you have them, then point Roon toward your locally networked music files. You must designate the MU2 itself as its own output device. The only novel step is installing the Grimm Audio Extension, if the MU2 screen tells you it needs to be activated. This makes it possible to display track information on the MU2, and it gives the MU2's large control disc access to Roon.

The MU2 includes all of Roon—the whole feature set— and Roon Remote works perfectly, but Roon has no provision to access analog inputs or to switch between the line or headphone outputs. To accomplish these things, you can use the control disc—or you can use the Grimm UI (GRUI) web interface, which supports selecting inputs (analog, digital, and network) and outputs (line and headphone) and, via submenus, configuring system-startup settings, level offsets for the analog inputs, IR programming, and advanced system operations. The important display of active content info, control of volume, mute, and pause are accessible via the Roon Remote, GRUI, and directly on the MU2 (via its front panel display and control disc).

At first, I worried about that do-everything flying saucer, trained as I am on more traditional single-function knobs, but using it quickly became intuitive, and it was always easy to locate, even in the near dark. Tapping, pressing, and turning the disc was like interacting with one of Felonius Gru, Sr.'s friendly, bouncy minions.

At last!
I could not wait to hear some music, so instead of exploring options or waiting for Roon in the MU2 to process my main library, I directed it to the 2TB portable drive and selected a favorite: Ligeti's Six Bagatelles for Wind Quintet in a 24/96 remaster from Harmonia Mundi. From the first note—as the five instruments tootled and crooned—they (the instruments) appeared comfortably arrayed across the front of my room, just a short distance behind the speakers. Since this recording incorporates only minimal ambient information, there was a definite illusion of the presence of the instruments in my room. Each was clearly delineated, and the overall balance was neutral, favoring nothing but revealing the full, inherent color and body of the instruments. Depth is not a factor in this recording, but width was appropriate. What a wonderful welcome home; thank you, MU2.

My experience was strikingly different with an interesting arrangement for violin and piano of a suite from Prokofiev's Romeo and Juliet. Here, with just these two instruments (Lana Trotovsek, Maria Canyigueral. 16/44.1 FLAC download, SOMM SOMMCD 0671), the soundstage is huge. At the start, we hear the violin on the left and fairly close and the piano somewhat farther back on the right. Both are immersed in a space much larger than my listening room, with a warm acoustic ambience that does not obscure them at all. They have good presence and body and a pleasing, natural tonal balance. Apparently, the MU2 does not obscure subtleties of instrument placement or acoustics.


Footnote 1: The work does include substantial in-wall rewiring for AC, Ethernet, and extensive CAT6-based audio connections.

Footnote 2: I remain curious about the MU1's ability to support multichannel using the dedicated LS1 output or S/PDIF RCA and the two AES3 outputs but these went away with the digital outputs.

Footnote 3: Since there are no digital outputs on the MU2, there are no longer options for up/downsampling or DSD-to-PCM conversion.

Footnote 4: The MU2 does not come with a remote control, but for those who want to use one this sensor allows the user to connect and program a wide range of RCs. I saw no need to attempt this as smartphone/tablet control is better.

COMPANY INFO
Grimm Audio BV
Veldhoven
The Netherlands
(+31) 40 213 1562
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
Archimago's picture

Nice that they're using a good quality steep linear phase filter these days, like Chord.

Hope the days of hand wringing around "pre-ringing" and low quality short impulse responses coming to an end.

supamark's picture

How is using a filter with the absolute worst phase response a good thing? Literally any other filter type (non-brickwall and/or non-linear phase) would have better, more accurate, phase response. I'm sorry you can't hear it, but just like my opinion of wine (grape juice w/ ethanol, yuck) is valid only for me; your opinion on digital audio filtering is valid only for you. Brickwall linear phase filters always sound thin, grey, and broken to me. Same for every full range class D amp I've heard (nCore, Eigentakt, ICEPower).

Subjective opinion does not equal objective fact. Objectively a low order minimum phase filter will have the best phase response with the penalty being some ultrasonics and top octave rolloff, and a little back reflection (but less of each than no filter) - TANSTAAFL. It's also, broadly, (if Meridian/MQA is to be believed) the most pleasing filter type based on research/listening tests.

Archimago's picture

Linear phase filtering is the ideal for DACs. Does not add phase shift and achieves the best rise time for transients. Don't know why you're thinking otherwise.

These are the objective facts, not subjective opinions. Isn't your claim that: "Brickwall linear phase filters always sound thin, grey, and broken to me." purely subjective? I don't think the folks at Chord, or Grimm (or myself) hear it that way...

supamark's picture

Linear phase literally shifts the phase of ALL frequencies because the response is a linear function of frequency. There's no phase *distortion* but there's usually a ton of group delay because it affects every freaquin' frequency. With the same frequency response/rolloff, linear phase filters always sound brighter than minimum phase to me.

The amount of shift/group delay with a linear phase brick wall filter (like Schiit and Chord use) is unacceptable to my ears. It makes them cry. TANSTAAFL, it's as valid as the laws of thermodynamics. For me, the tradeoffs are much much more acceptable with a slow rolloff minimum phase filter than any other type. For high sample rates, I prefer no filter but it can get weird at 44.1 kHz.

Linear phase sounds inferior to me, and as I said before just because you can't hear it doesn't mean others (like myself) cannot. I also think DSD sounds bad (smeared in time), and don't get why anyone likes it over PCM... but some people do. Maybe it reminds them of the way analog tape smears sound.

As an aside, at this price point they could have programmed a few more digital filters for variety into the FPGA or at the least added a digital output. There is no single perfect D/A filter for all people, and they went with what is probably the least popular type (brick wall) lol. Nearly every mfg uses a low pass that doesn't reach full stop band attenuation until above Nyquist at 44.1 kHz sampling freq. Even highly engineering focused companies like Mola Mola, Weiss, and Benchmark.

Glotz's picture

No response from Arch either... Hmm..

rt66indierock's picture

I wasn’t going to respond to supamark’s posts because “they are not even wrong.” But your comment changed my mind.

rt66indierock's picture

Knowledgeable Stereophile readers will:
• Question your hearing.
• Wonder about your ability to evaluate research.
• Doubt your understanding of digital audio.

Glotz's picture

It's a discussion, not an attack. (Unless one takes it personally.)

Build an argument and rebuttals follow. And if we are wrong, own up and perhaps learn?

Like, what specifically are you referring to in Supamark's comments? Or just hollow accusations?

rt66indierock's picture

There are three kinds of opinions, well-reasoned, poorly reasoned and not even wrong. "What you said was so confused that one could not tell whether it was nonsense or not," Wolfgang Pauli.

So, let’s talk about hearing. After MQA and Mobile Fidelity the hobby and industry took a lot of hits and reputations were hurt because of hearing claims. I’ve met over a thousand audiophiles over the last eight years. If this sample is representative of the hobby, a third of audiophiles don’t hear well. Their words not mine, I never ask. Other than Kal who on the masthead have I not criticized about what they heard in MQA files? Then there is aging. Hearing declines with age. It declines faster if you listen to loud music.

If I’m going to attack a person they know it. Ask Jim Austin who has my email blocked.

Now tell me what did supamark say that you think makes sense.

Glotz's picture

You have a lot of nonsense here. You've met a thousand audiophiles and a third of them can't hear? Dude, you couldn't meet three people and not have them call security... lol.

Kal and MQA files? Wha? Industry was hurt because of hearing claims? Who?

Your mental acuity also declines with age. Case in point above... lol.

Your attacks are like that crazy old bald guy down at the end of the hall of the nursing home. Lol.

Thanks for coming back... You are heeeelarious.

jorgen's picture

I cannot find Kalmans email adress anywhere...

Kal Rubinson's picture

I am not hard to find but, if you cannot, send comments to Jim.Austin@stereophile.com and they will get to me.

Glotz's picture

-

Aaron Garrett's picture

Thanks for reminding me of that great Ligeti recording, now streaming through my Grimm MU1!

rschryer's picture

...this new comments system—why can't I see the number of comments anymore posted on top of each article? I end up clicking on articles I don't want to click on, or click too many times on articles I like but that don't necessarily deserve more clicks.

Am I the only one who feels this way?

teched58's picture

There are only three reasons to remove the number of posts from beneath each story's headline on the home page:

1) They don't want or care if people comment, possibly because they're tired of the persistence of combative posts, or

2) The number of comments for most articles is very low, which makes for a poor outward presentation if one wants to emphasize the amount of traffic a site is generating.

3) It's a temporary platform glitch and with Iverson retired, it's taking longer to fix

Jim, this is not bashing you so I hope you wont delete this. If you made the decision for either of the first two reasons, I may not agree but I understand.

David Harper's picture

I suspect it's because so many articles recieve zero comments it looks bad. Or maybe too many of the same small handful of commentors.

rschryer's picture

It sounded harsher (and more juvenile) to me today than it did last night when I wrote it. I banished it.

Cheers.

X