EMM Labs MTRS power amplifier Measurements

Sidebar 3: Measurements

I examined the EMM Labs MTRS's measured behavior with my Audio Precision SYS2722 system. After connecting the amplifier to the wall supply with the supplied Kimber Ascent cable, I preconditioned the MTRS, following the CEA's recommendation of running it at one-eighth the maximum power into 8 ohms for 30 minutes. At the end of that time, the temperature of the top panel was 80.6°F (27.0°C) and that of the heatsinks 94.4°F (34.7°C). Given the relatively low heatsink temperatures and the amplifier's massive size, I subsequently ran it for an hour at one-third the maximum power into 8 ohms. (With a class-AB amplifier, one-third power results in the maximum heat dissipation in the output devices.) At the end of that time, the heatsinks were somewhat warmer, at 104.2°F (40.1°C). The MTRS has more-than-sufficient heatsink capacity for its high output power.

I performed all the testing using the EMM's balanced inputs, then repeated some tests with the single-ended inputs. (Although this wasn't mentioned in the manual at the time, I needed to short the XLR jacks' pins 1 and 3 for these tests, as otherwise the amplifier's gain changed unpredictably.) Both input types preserved absolute polarity, ie, were noninverting. The MTRS's input impedance is specified as 100k ohms for both input types. I measured 114k ohms at 20Hz, 100k ohms at 1kHz, and 90k ohms at 20kHz for the balanced inputs. The single-ended input impedance was 47k ohms at 20Hz and 1kHz, 40k ohms at 20kHz. The voltage gain is specified as 30dB for both balanced and single-ended inputs. I measured 29.6dB at 1kHz into 8 ohms for both types.


Fig.1 EMM Labs MTRS, frequency response at 2.83V into: simulated loudspeaker load (gray), 8 ohms (left channel blue, right channel red), 4 ohms (left cyan, right magenta), and 2 ohms (green) (1dB/vertical div.).


Fig.2 EMM Labs MTRS, small-signal 10kHz squarewave into 8 ohms.

The EMM amplifier's output impedance, including the series impedance of 6' of spaced-pair cable, was relatively low at 0.22 ohm at low and middle frequencies and 0.235 ohm at the top of the audioband. As a result, the variation in the frequency response with our standard simulated loudspeaker (fig.1, gray trace) was minimal. The response into resistive loads (blue, red, cyan, magenta, and green traces) was flat in the audioband, then started to roll off above 40kHz. The wide small-signal bandwidth correlated with short risetimes in the EMM's reproduction of a 10kHz squarewave into 8 ohms (fig.2), and commendably, there wasn't any overshoot or ringing.


Fig.3 EMM Labs MTRS, spectrum of 1kHz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 1Wpc into 8 ohms (left channel blue, right channel red; linear frequency scale).

Channel separation was 85dB in both directions across the audioband. The unweighted, wideband signal/noise ratio, taken with the balanced input shorted to ground, was an excellent 77dB (average of both channels) ref. 1W into 8 ohms. This ratio improved to 88.7dB when the measurement bandwidth was restricted to 22Hz–22kHz, and to 91.4dB when A-weighted. This is a quiet amplifier. Spectral analysis of the low-frequency noisefloor while the EMM drove a 1kHz tone at 1Wpc into 8 ohms revealed a low random noisefloor, and while even- and odd-order harmonics of 60Hz were present, these all lay at or below –100dB (fig.3).


Fig.4 EMM Labs MTRS, THD+N (%) vs 1kHz continuous output power into 8 ohms.


Fig.5 EMM Labs MTRS, THD+N (%) vs 1kHz continuous output power into 4 ohms.


Fig.6 EMM Labs MTRS, THD+N (%) vs 1kHz continuous output power into 2 ohms.

EMM specifies the MTRS's maximum continuous power as 330W into 4 ohms (22.18dBW), but there is no mention of the 8 ohm power in the published specifications. With the clipping power defined as being when the THD+noise reaches 1%, with both channels driven the MTRS clipped at 205W into 8 ohms (23.1dBW, fig.4) and 320W into 4 ohms (22dBW). When I examined the maximum power into 2 ohms with one channel driven, the amplifier went into standby mode at 349W (19.4dBW, fig.6). As usual, I had a portable FM radio tuned to NPR during the testing; peculiarly, the radio picked up bursts of static noise at the inflexion points in the traces in figs.4–6. Perhaps this was due to the amplifier's State Control & Measurement system.


Fig.7 EMM Labs MTRS, THD+N (%) vs frequency at 12.67V into: 8 ohms (left channel blue, right red), 4 ohms (left cyan, right magenta), and 2 ohms (left green, right gray).

The THD+N percentage at 12.67V, which is equivalent to 20W into 8 ohms, 40W into 4 ohms, and 80W into 2 ohms, was very low into 8 ohms (fig.7, blue and red traces), and there was only a hint of rise in the THD+N in the top octave, which implies that the MTRS has a wide open-loop bandwidth. The distortion rose across the band into 4 ohms (cyan, magenta traces) and rose higher into 2 ohms (green, gray traces).


Fig.8 EMM Labs MTRS, 1kHz waveform at 20W into 8 ohms, 0.005% THD+N (top); distortion and noise waveform with fundamental notched out (bottom, not to scale).


Fig.9 EMM Labs MTRS, spectrum of 50Hz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 50Wpc into 8 ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).


Fig.10 EMM Labs MTRS, HF intermodulation spectrum, DC–30kHz, 19+20kHz at 100W peak into 4 ohms ((left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

The distortion waveform was predominantly third harmonic (fig.8), though this was accompanied by the second harmonic at a lower level (fig.9). Intermodulation distortion with an equal mix of 19 and 20kHz tones was low in level even into 4 ohms (fig.10). The second-order difference product lay at –104dB ref. 100W peak into 4 ohms (0.0006%). The higher-order products at 18kHz and 21kHz were higher in level, but these still lay close to –80dB (0.01%).

The EMM Labs MTRS's measurements indicate that it offers high powers with very low levels of noise and both harmonic and intermodulation distortion.—John Atkinson

COMPANY INFO
EMM Labs and Meitner Audio
119-5065 13th St. S.E.
Calgary, Alberta
Canada T2G 5M8
sales@emmlabs.com
(403) 225-4161
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
georgehifi's picture

JA: "As a result, the variation in the frequency response with our standard simulated loudspeaker (fig.1, gray trace) was minimal."

Impressive result for an amp using just local feedback (good DF/output impedance), always a good thing if you can get that and good distortion figures without global feedback.(good achievement)

That's why I'm looking forward to measurements on the new Peachtree Class-D's "GaN1" or "Carina GaN", as they both don't use any global feedback, which is a huge thing for Class-D amps, which usually have masses of global feedback to get their good distortion figures with.

Cheers George

Ortofan's picture

... the "MTRS is able to drive the most severe loads" and the "MTRS can handle any speaker load with ease" and the "MTRS has the uncanny ability to drive low impedance speakers down to an ohm!"

Per JA1's test, "when I examined the maximum power into 2 ohms with one channel driven, the amplifier went into standby mode."

JohnnyThunder2.0's picture

isolate the one negative test measurement and shines a light on it - a measurement by the way - that would never happen in real world listening. I'm sure your plastic Parasounds would melt too. Or your bargain Marantz clones which are not even good enough to undergo such a test. This is what I took away from Jason's review: The EMM Labs MTRS is the finest, most musically complete stereo amp I've reviewed to date. As much as the word "neutrality" come to mind, it falls short as a descriptor of sound as honest, true, thrilling, heart-warming, and emotionally rewarding as the MTRS's.

But you don't ask a question about anything about the music or the build quality or anything other than being the measurement police. Please go away.

Anton's picture

To the good:

He didn't simply list comparably priced gear and opine the fact they weren't mentioned.

So, I'd call it progress, of a sort!

;-D

JohnnyThunder2.0's picture

Baby steps.

Ortofan's picture

... Dave Ramsey?

Ortofan's picture

... so-called "plastic Parasounds", you should note that JA1 has a Parasound preamp and a pair of Parasound monoblock power amps in his reference system. Regarding Marantz amps, check the test results from Hi-Fi News before you criticize them.

As far as an isolated test measurement, the EMM brochure brags three times about the amps ability to drive low impedance loads, yet it fails JA1's test. Shouldn't an amp, especially one with a $65K price tag, be able to be meet or exceed all of the claims made for it?

If you want an amp to drive Wilson speakers, then get one from Dan D'Agostino. At least you know that they test them using Wilson speakers.

https://parttimeaudiophile.com/2022/11/11/dan-dagostino-momentum-s250-mxv-amplifier-review/

Regarding build quality, how much can you determine from one interior photo showing mostly the power supply filter capacitors?

Regarding music, this is an equipment review.
If you want to determine whether or not the amp is "neutral", then perform a bypass test as David Hafler proposed decades ago.

JohnnyThunder2.0's picture

JA never mentioned what you see as a fatal flaw in his summation. The amp didn't blow a fuse or catch on fire. It went into standby mode during a test that would never mimic real world listening situations which maybe is what it was supposed to do! You, by always looking for something negative so you can say "gotcha" to the Stereophile reviewer or measurer, should go into standby mode and leave the driving to the professional magazine journalists that work at Stereophile.

JohnnyThunder2.0's picture

it's a review of equipment that amplifies recorded music. You judge the equipment by how it plays back the MUSIC. You don't "listen" to measurements. What David Hafler proposes is of no interest here. Art Dudley and Herb and Alex didn't/don't give a sh-t about Hafler's method. They listen(ed) to music. They didn't measure. That's JA1s job. Ignorance and arrogance is a dangerous cocktail and you freely imbibe when posting your silly musings here. You will never get it.

cognoscente's picture

only a power amplifier (how expensive is the full set matching this?) for 2x the price of a (complete) Audi A3 or more than the price of a (complete) Audi A6, and that's a hell of a car. Again, this price is not in proportion between things.

You cannot buy goosebumps, a tear or a laugh from music with an expensive set. Goosebumps, a tear or a laugh are caused by elements in music and combination with emotional and psychological circumstances at that moment. Not the equipment!

And no, I'm not saying that we all should all listen music with a Sonos, or Audio Pro or small JBL speakers. I'm not doing that either. But buying a disproportionately expensive set is no longer about enjoying and experiencing the emotion in the music, but is food for psychologists.

If you drive a Bugatti, okay, I understand. But then I ask why do you need a Bugatti? What do you need to compensate or camouflage?

Anton's picture

Exactly one click prior to seeing your post, I was perusing 2024 Audi S4 sedans.

It gave me a start to then see your post!

Cheers, man!

Ortofan's picture

... and am never going back there. Things broke on the Audi that never failed on the Acuras I had afterwards. If you really want the Audi, then consider leasing it for no longer than the length of the warranty.
Or, do as JVS does (at last report) and drive a Toyota Corolla - which leaves more disposable income to spend on audio equipment and recordings.

X