The SC-I ($995/pair) is the smallest model in the "Signature Collection" to come from Dunlavy Audio Labs, the company founded by <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/interviews/163">John Dunlavy</A> after he left Duntech. The largest model in this series used to be the $4995/pair SC-IV that Robert Deutsch so enthusiastically reviewed last April, and that this month was voted <I>Stereophile</I>'s 1994 "Product of the Year." There is now also a huge <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/162">SC-VI</A&gt; available.

The SC-I ($995/pair) is the smallest model in the "Signature Collection" to come from Dunlavy Audio Labs, the company founded by <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/interviews/163">John Dunlavy</A> after he left Duntech. The largest model in this series used to be the $4995/pair SC-IV that Robert Deutsch so enthusiastically reviewed last April, and that this month was voted <I>Stereophile</I>'s 1994 "Product of the Year." There is now also a huge <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/162">SC-VI</A&gt; available.

The SC-I ($995/pair) is the smallest model in the "Signature Collection" to come from Dunlavy Audio Labs, the company founded by <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/interviews/163">John Dunlavy</A> after he left Duntech. The largest model in this series used to be the $4995/pair SC-IV that Robert Deutsch so enthusiastically reviewed last April, and that this month was voted <I>Stereophile</I>'s 1994 "Product of the Year." There is now also a huge <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/162">SC-VI</A&gt; available.

The SC-I ($995/pair) is the smallest model in the "Signature Collection" to come from Dunlavy Audio Labs, the company founded by <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/interviews/163">John Dunlavy</A> after he left Duntech. The largest model in this series used to be the $4995/pair SC-IV that Robert Deutsch so enthusiastically reviewed last April, and that this month was voted <I>Stereophile</I>'s 1994 "Product of the Year." There is now also a huge <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/162">SC-VI</A&gt; available.

The SC-I ($995/pair) is the smallest model in the "Signature Collection" to come from Dunlavy Audio Labs, the company founded by <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/interviews/163">John Dunlavy</A> after he left Duntech. The largest model in this series used to be the $4995/pair SC-IV that Robert Deutsch so enthusiastically reviewed last April, and that this month was voted <I>Stereophile</I>'s 1994 "Product of the Year." There is now also a huge <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/162">SC-VI</A&gt; available.

The SC-I ($995/pair) is the smallest model in the "Signature Collection" to come from Dunlavy Audio Labs, the company founded by <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/interviews/163">John Dunlavy</A> after he left Duntech. The largest model in this series used to be the $4995/pair SC-IV that Robert Deutsch so enthusiastically reviewed last April, and that this month was voted <I>Stereophile</I>'s 1994 "Product of the Year." There is now also a huge <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/162">SC-VI</A&gt; available.

The <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/phonocartridges/ortofon_mc-2000_mc_phono_car… MC-2000</A> may just have been the most impractical cartridge to be unleashed upon the audio community for some years. With a high compliance (20cu) that made it ill-suited for most tonearms, it also had a preposterously low signal output of 50 microvolts, which gave new meaning to the terms hum and noise. Few MC preamps had enough gain to deliver adequate driving voltage to a system, and none of those that did had low enough noise to be usable with the 2000. If the problem wasn't hum, it was hiss; if hiss was acceptably low, there would be too much hum. At least Ortofon had the sense to be aware of the problem and to do something about it, in the form of their T-2000 step-up transformer, which is the only device I ever found that would allow the cartridge to be operated without a constant background of hum or hiss. Despite all this, I have used the MC-2000 as my reference cartridge for the last two years. Why? Because of all the cartridges I've tried, it is by far the most accurate.

The <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/phonocartridges/ortofon_mc-2000_mc_phono_car… MC-2000</A> may just have been the most impractical cartridge to be unleashed upon the audio community for some years. With a high compliance (20cu) that made it ill-suited for most tonearms, it also had a preposterously low signal output of 50 microvolts, which gave new meaning to the terms hum and noise. Few MC preamps had enough gain to deliver adequate driving voltage to a system, and none of those that did had low enough noise to be usable with the 2000. If the problem wasn't hum, it was hiss; if hiss was acceptably low, there would be too much hum. At least Ortofon had the sense to be aware of the problem and to do something about it, in the form of their T-2000 step-up transformer, which is the only device I ever found that would allow the cartridge to be operated without a constant background of hum or hiss. Despite all this, I have used the MC-2000 as my reference cartridge for the last two years. Why? Because of all the cartridges I've tried, it is by far the most accurate.

The <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/phonocartridges/ortofon_mc-2000_mc_phono_car… MC-2000</A> may just have been the most impractical cartridge to be unleashed upon the audio community for some years. With a high compliance (20cu) that made it ill-suited for most tonearms, it also had a preposterously low signal output of 50 microvolts, which gave new meaning to the terms hum and noise. Few MC preamps had enough gain to deliver adequate driving voltage to a system, and none of those that did had low enough noise to be usable with the 2000. If the problem wasn't hum, it was hiss; if hiss was acceptably low, there would be too much hum. At least Ortofon had the sense to be aware of the problem and to do something about it, in the form of their T-2000 step-up transformer, which is the only device I ever found that would allow the cartridge to be operated without a constant background of hum or hiss. Despite all this, I have used the MC-2000 as my reference cartridge for the last two years. Why? Because of all the cartridges I've tried, it is by far the most accurate.

The <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/phonocartridges/ortofon_mc-2000_mc_phono_car… MC-2000</A> may just have been the most impractical cartridge to be unleashed upon the audio community for some years. With a high compliance (20cu) that made it ill-suited for most tonearms, it also had a preposterously low signal output of 50 microvolts, which gave new meaning to the terms hum and noise. Few MC preamps had enough gain to deliver adequate driving voltage to a system, and none of those that did had low enough noise to be usable with the 2000. If the problem wasn't hum, it was hiss; if hiss was acceptably low, there would be too much hum. At least Ortofon had the sense to be aware of the problem and to do something about it, in the form of their T-2000 step-up transformer, which is the only device I ever found that would allow the cartridge to be operated without a constant background of hum or hiss. Despite all this, I have used the MC-2000 as my reference cartridge for the last two years. Why? Because of all the cartridges I've tried, it is by far the most accurate.