California Audio Labs Sigma D/A processor Associated Equipment

Sidebar 1: Associated Equipment

My reference playback system has remained nearly constant for the past year, providing a stable platform on which to audition and compare digital processors. I auditioned the four processors reviewed in this issue under identical conditions and at matched levels. Additionally, the reference playback system has remained nearly constant for the past year, providing a stable platform on which to audition and compare digital processors. The converters under review fed an Audio Research LS2 line-stage preamplifier, which in turn drove a Mark Levinson No.23.5 power amplifier via its unbalanced inputs. Loudspeakers were Hales System Two Signatures, occasionally augmented with a Muse Model 18 subwoofer.

Interconnects included Expressive Technologies IC-2, AudioQuest Diamond, and Monster Cable Sigma (no relation to the CAL Sigma!). Loudspeaker cable was 8' runs of bi-wired AudioQuest Sterling/Midnight. A Theta Data Series II transport or Museatex CD-Deck provided the digital signal, and a variety of digital interconnects were auditioned with each processor.

Other converters on hand for comparison included the Theta DS Pre Generation III, Musik System Zero, and that low-cost standard, the Audio Alchemy Digital Decoding Engine. The excellent $1500 Musik System Zero provided a good benchmark for these much-lower-priced units under review, and the Audio Alchemy DDE brought another reference point at the lower end of the scale.

All AC power to the processors was conditioned with a Tice Power Block and Titan, and all the processors were left on during the three-week audition (footnote 1).—Robert Harley


Footnote 1: Leaving your D/A converter on all the time ensures that it will always sound its best. If you turn it on just before listening, you'll never hear what it can really do. I find that it often takes several days or even a week before a processor reaches its maximum smoothness and liquidity. In addition, leaving the processor constantly powered reduces turn-on/off stress on internal components, increasing the product's life.
COMPANY INFO
California Audio Labs
Company no longer in existence (2020)
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
Glotz's picture

Today $200 destroys it... err, we've come a long way in 30 years.

Most of entry level audio was chalky and lacking resolve. Can't fault CAL for mating it with tubes.

Robin Landseadel's picture

The Topping E30, at $130, destroys it.

Glotz's picture

And the Schiit Modius destroys the Topping E30.. for $200.

PeterPani's picture

When playing CD on my 1984-model Sony CDP-101, comparing it with several audiophile DAC's I purchased since - I am not sure what sounds better. Mostly everything on digital sounds the same. Every song is a repetition of digital characteristics fatiguing my ear canals until I switch back to analog.

volvic's picture

I think the weakness with digital or 16 bit/44.1 isn't the disc itself but the machines. I sound like a broken record, but I was hesitant in 2007 to move on to computer audio, but when I heard how much better it was and not by a small margin, but by a substantial margin, there was no going back. The drawbacks are the poor sorting, metadata and the occasional firewalls preventing certain software from working, but the sound is truly revelatory. Surprised your CDP 101 is working, mine long stopped functioning. Still have two CDP 111s that struggle. Most likely the servo is the culprit.

Ortofan's picture

... Sony CDP-X339ES, a complete CD player with superior D/A performance.
https://www.radiomuseum.org/r/sony_compact_disc_player_cdp_x339es.html

hollowman's picture

A 30 Year Old DAC Vs a Modern $1K SMSL D400 EX!

A recent video by a YT hifi vlogger "My Own Devices Audio Channel":
========
My Own Devices Audio Channel
16K subscribers
2,311 views Sep 3, 2023
Review of the SMSL D400 EX DAC. I compare it to a Topping D70s and a 30+ year old, California Audio Labs Sigma Tube DAC.
https://youtu.be/fVJITeppIKM

=============

X