Marantz SA1152

Michael, ...Mike, (can I call you Mike?) for the love of GOD...a $3500 CD player is no more 'moderately priced' or ' modestly' priced than was the Congress's last $4700 pay raise in a recession prudent and well earned.

The average family income before taxes is only a bit more than $50K....This 'modestly' priced item costs perhaps 10% of their income after taxes! That is one hell of a lot of money to most folk.

An Investment in Soul

An Investment in Soul

What depression? There's nothing like a good old-fashioned listening party for lighting a fire on your savings account. Might as well spend your money now before it disappears. Turn your money into stuff. Turn your stuff into records. <a href="http://www.devorefidelity.com/">John DeVore</a> should charge admission to his new listening room. Perhaps he'll accept payment in vinyl. I'd happily pay one limited edition pressing for an evening of outstanding music and fine company.

Slim Devices Transporter?

Is the Slim Devices Transporter worth the money (2000 usd)? Isn't there a cd/sacd-player that is better, in the mentioned price range? Marantz SA-15S2, Moon CD-1, NAD M5 etc.?
I want a neutral, transparent sound, with great dynamics and a lot of details. I also want a great soundstage.
Could the Slim Devices Transporter be the one for me?

Question to JA or one of the powers that be..

I remember reading about a new(ish) German Label that released primarily on vinyl(classical recordings)...can someone refresh my memory? Do they have a website? The original Stereophile mention was a couple months back...the label head said that Vinyl had more spectral information, whereas redbook had a sharp drop off....

Paco de Lucia Shreds

Paco de Lucia Shreds

<object width="450" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/89zM9pZzt0U&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/89zM9pZzt0U&hl=en&fs=1&quot; type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="450" height="344"></embed></object>

Keith Jarrett's Awesome Night at Carnegie Hall

Keith Jarrett's Awesome Night at Carnegie Hall

I went to see Keith Jarrett play solo at Carnegie Hall last night. This may puzzle careful readers of this blog, who no doubt recall my <A HREF="http://blog.stereophile.com/fredkaplan/081107">boycott</A&gt; of Jarrett in August 2007 after his disgraceful behavior at the Umbria Jazz Festival, on top of a career of disgraceful behavior. Well, I decided to call an end my own pique. First, I’m told that Jarrett apologized to the people of Umbria. Second, now that Barack Obama is president, the tantrums of a piano player are more likely to be seen as a mere random annoyance than “yet another example” of American brutishness. Finally, I figured, it’s a new era, I’ll give the guy another chance. He’s too good an artist—too great, really—to ignore just because he’s a jerk. (Jackson Pollock was much more unpleasant, yet that doesn’t stop me from gazing at <I>Number One (1950)</I> every time I visit the Museum of Modern Art.)

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement