Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
I assume that Fig 1 is the "before"? Can we get a screenshot of the "after"?
Similarly, in the opening measures of Johan Kvandal's Fantasy for Clarinet, Op.68 No.2, also on 2L (SACD/CD, 2L 55)a Meridian Master Quality Authenticated recording played through a non-MQA DAC, which means, according to Meridian, that it should sound a bit better than a CDthe close-miked clarinet had exceptional body. And when an early, large crescendo challenged clarinetist Fredrik Fors's dynamic range, his sound broke up in a way that's familiar to me (I've heard that sound live, from good seats), but that rarely comes across from recordingsat least not with such humanity. The P10 consistently helped bring out music's varied textures so that I was more actively engaged in it. It was hard not to listen.
There's evidence that the quality of AC power is especially important in digital audio. In his review of AudioQuest's JitterBug USB noise filter ($49) in the September 2015 issue, JA related what happened when his computer broke and he began listening to CDs again with his Ayre Acoustics C-5xeMP universal player: "Every disc I played sounded more solid, more corporeal than I remembered from the many times I'd played the same tracks from the Mac mini. The low frequencies sounded more authoritative, much as they had when I bought a Mark Levinson No.31 CD transport (now long since retired with mechanical problems)." With the JitterBuga purely passive device that conditions a component's USB outputsJA found that music from his Mac mini sounded much more like what he'd experienced with the Ayre: "The low frequencies acquired more of the authority I experience with CDs."
I heard the same thing in my home, with my system plugged into the P10: more authority in the low frequencies. JA's observation (and mine) illustrates the importance of powerthe height of waveforms, not just their timingfor digital sources, which is where I've noticed the most improvement with the P10 (footnote 3). I've already mentioned the Power Plant's effect on music's textures, and the increased bass authority; with the P10 in the system, I also found that the aural images reproduced from digital sourcesspecifically, PS Audio's NuWave DSD, and their DirectStream DAC, which I borrowed from JAwere also fleshier, more corporeal, and better located in space. The sound with the P10 also seemed more natural and less electronicalmost suggesting a physical rather than electronic playback medium. As I wrote in the review of the NuWave DSD, a wood block sounded like a wood block, not a recording of a wood block.
Conclusions
In this age of improving power supplies, is a device like the PerfectWave P10 Power Plant necessary? That will depend on the quality of your incoming AC, something that varies from region to region (footnote 4). My apartment building is small by Manhattan standardsjust 25 apartmentsbut it's attached to similar buildings on right and left, with another one just behind. Right now, my MacBook Pro detects 33 wireless networks. Then there are the dimmer switches, switching power supplies, and cheap electronic transformers attached to low-voltage lights. All of those things affect my power supplyand this summer, the more than 30 window air conditioners in my building will suck even more energy from my AC.
Even as I write this, in Marchstill in heating season!the P10's built-in 'scope tells me that the power coming out of my wall has 45% total harmonic distortion. The result is a dejected-looking wave more sawtooth than sine: it looks as if it's about to break. To mix metaphors, its peaks are like erstwhile mountains in West Virginia coal country (speaking of decrepit power infrastructure). Again, the reason this happens is the reason it matters: The peak of the household-AC waveform corresponds to the point where the capacitors in the power supplies of my audio components recharge. Chop off that peak, and the power supplies in my gear are starved at least a little bit, even when the available power seems ample.
It's not surprising that such a dejected-looking sinewave could suck the joy out of music. I knew it was possible that fixing my power would make my music cleaner and more accurate. What I didn't anticipate was that it would make the music so much more engaging. Maybe more accurate is more engagingan appealing thought. Anyway, the PerfectWave P10 Power Plant may be an essential accessory for any audiophile who lives in a neighborhood like mine. A power conditionersorry, regeneratormay not be a sexy purchase, but I'm going to have a hard time sending this thing back.
But, againit depends. If you live in a quiet valley with a little stream running through it, and your house is served by its own private transformer, you may not need a power regenerator to get the kind of sound I'm getting with the P10. (I lived in a place like that for some 10 years; unfortunately, the acoustics sucked.) If you live in the US, PS Audio makes it easy to find out: You can audition a PerfectWave P10 Power Plantor any of the other components for sale on their websiterisk-free via PSA's home-trial program.
Footnote 4: It's also true that some components can more easily overcome the problems created by degraded AC power, but without testing, it's impossible to know.
I assume that Fig 1 is the "before"? Can we get a screenshot of the "after"?
I've been living with the P10 for 4 months now. I consider it indispensable. I hear all the attributes you mention, but the most noticeable thing for me was the dynamic impact. And I have 'good' power - the P10 says my wall supply has 2.2% THD.
As a point of comparison, I would offer that I have never heard a set of interconnects or speaker cables that make the same magnitude of impact (and I'm a cable 'believer').
"the opinion can be defended on technical grounds: low-pass filters limit how fast current can flow"
Jim,
This is only true of *inductive* passive filtering. But not so with capacitive filtering, which is achieved with a parallel, not series connection and does not limit current flow, or the rise time for it.
Additionally, this does not have the ringing problem of the unfortunately ubiquitous conventional inductive technique. Also, there are inexpensive additional tricks for stripping RF garbage from the line. There are capacitance based power conditioners on the market. The regenerator types should more properly be compared to those if you want to talk about the effects on dynamics. Nor do they cost any voltage "off the top". Sorry, but on technical grounds, this review is incomplete.
(Good) regenerators do work well, but this is a very costly solution, where well designed passive types not using inductors can deliver excellent results at a fraction of the price. Plus, these do not have the current supply limitations of these bulky space consuming one-frequency (adjustable of not*) amplifiers, which is what these are after all, on electronic steroids. And the power supply to any piece of equipment is critical even if one is lucky enough to be located in "quiet valley with a little stream running through it, and your house is served by its own private transformer", even with great acoustics.
* Also useful as speed controls for turntables using AC synchronous motors, not mentioned in this article.
Can Stereophile provide before/after measurements of source, preamp, and amplifier behavior? I know they don't tell the whole story, but it would be extremely interesting to see if there are any changes in measured performance due to power conditioning.
Bob Ludwig's Gateway Mastering Studio in Portland Maine powers the studio gear with pure sine inverters powered by large batteries (said to be each the size of domestic kitchen refrigerators), disconnected from the battery chargers when in use.