PS Audio PerfectWave DirectStream MK2 D/A processor Mt Massive

John Atkinson returned to the PS Audio DirectStream MK2 in July 2024 (Vol.47 No.7)

When I reviewed the new version of PS Audio's classic D/A processor (footnote 1) in the June 2023 issue, I enjoyed its sound quality, but some aspects of its measured performance concerned me. The impulse and frequency responses, the behavior of the reconstruction filter, the channel separation, the low intermodulation distortion, and the balanced and single-ended output impedances were all beyond reproach, and though harmonic distortion was higher in level than I was expecting, it was still sufficiently low. However, the level of ultrasonic noise was higher than I had found with PS Audio's original DirectStream processor running the "Windom" FPGA firmware: The MK2 processor running the v2.3.6 firmware had 210mV of ultrasonic noise in its balanced outputs, with a center frequency of 370kHz, compared with the earlier version's 11mV of noise.

This noise will be due to the processor synchronously upsampling the input data to a 30-bit word length running at 56.4448MHz, followed by a digital-domain volume control. The resultant 50-bit, high–sample-rate data are resampled to quad-rate DSD and converted to analog with a low-pass filter. The problem was that enough of this noise leaked into the audioband to compromise the measured linearity and jitter rejection and limit resolution to 16 bits, even with 24-bit data.

Then, in the spring of 2024, PS Audio introduced the Mount Massive FPGA firmware for the DirectStream DAC MK2. The claimed improvements with this firmware were the lowering of ultrasonic noise by 30dB and audioband noise by 10dB. The Digital Lens FPGA buffer and user interface were also updated.

A follow-up review would be justified, so as our 2023 review sample had long since been returned, PS Audio sent me a sample with the new firmware. The processor's display indicated that this had the serial number 031053 and was fitted with the v3.1.0 firmware (the main OS firmware) and the 233-Massive firmware (specifically for the FPGA).

After some preliminary listening using Roon and the DirectStream's USB input—unlike the original DirectStream processor, the MK2 does not have an Ethernet port for audio data—I took the new MK2 into the test lab, where I performed a full set of measurements using first my Audio Precision SYS2722 system then the magazine's higher-performance APx555 analyzer.


Fig.1 PS Audio DirectStream MK2, v3.1.0 and 233-Massive FPGA firmware, wideband spectrum of white noise at –4dBFS (left channel red, right magenta), and with v2.3.6 firmware (left blue, right cyan), with data sampled at 44.1kHz (20dB/vertical div.).

The MK2's maximum balanced output level at 1kHz was similar to the 2023 sample's, at 3.71V, but now a lower level of ultrasonic noise was present in its output: 167mV. This can be seen in fig.1, which shows the wideband spectrum of white noise at –4dBFS with the v2.3.6 firmware (left channel blue, right cyan) and with the Mount Massive firmware (left red, right magenta). The level of the earlier firmware's ultrasonic noisefloor starts to rise above 40kHz, with the levels of the FFT bins reaching –90dBFS at 90kHz. By contrast, the Mount Massive's ultrasonic noisefloor doesn't start to rise until 70kHz and is up to 20dB lower below that frequency than it had been with the 2023 firmware.


Fig.2 PS Audio DirectStream MK2, v3.1.0 and 233-Massive FPGA firmware, spectrum with noise and spuriae of dithered 1kHz tone at 0dBFS with 24-bit data (left blue, right red) (20dB/vertical div.).


Fig.3 Weiss Helios, spectrum with noise and spuriae of dithered 1kHz tone at 0dBFS with 24-bit data (left blue, right red) (20dB/vertical div.).

What about the audioband noisefloor? Fig.2 shows the spectrum of the new DirectStream's low-frequency noisefloor while it drove a full-scale, 24-bit, 1kHz tone from the balanced outputs, with the volume control set to its maximum of "100." I used the APx555's brickwall input filter set to 20kHz to minimize the influence of the ultrasonic noise on the measurement. The individual elements of the PS Audio's random noisefloor lay around –122dBFS. To put this measurement into perspective, fig.3 shows the low-frequency noisefloor of the Weiss Helios processor that I reviewed in the March 2024 issue. Measured under identical conditions, the Helios's noisefloor is 30dB lower in level than the DirectStream's. (Note the expanded vertical scale in this graph.)


Fig.4 PS Audio DirectStream MK2, v2.3.6 firmware, spectrum with noise and spuriae of dithered 1kHz tone at –90dBFS with 24-bit data (left blue, right red) (10dB/vertical div.).


Fig.5 PS Audio DirectStream MK2, v3.1.0 and 233-Massive FPGA firmware, spectrum with noise and spuriae of dithered 1kHz tone at –90dBFS with 24-bit data (left blue, right red) (10dB/vertical div.).

How does this level of random noise affect the PS Audio's measured resolution? Fig.4 shows the spectrum of the 2023 DirectStream's output while it decoded dithered 24-bit data representing a 1kHz tone at –90dBFS. The level of the noisefloor is similar to that with the full-scale 1kHz tone in fig.2. However, when I repeated this test with the Mount Massive firmware, the level of the noisefloor dropped by up to 6dB (fig.5).


Fig.6 PS Audio DirectStream MK2, v3.1.0 and 233-Massive FPGA firmware, PS Audio's measurement, spectrum with noise and spuriae of dithered 1kHz tone at –90dBFS, bit depth unknown (left blue, right red) (10dB/vertical div.).

Despite this improvement, the DirectStream MK2's resolution is still limited to around 16 bits. I checked the spectrum shown in fig.5 against the same measurement that had been performed by PS Audio and is shown in fig.6. (Note the different aspect ratio of this graph.) My noisefloor looks cleaner than PS Audio's due to the fact that I average 32 FFT measurements to reduce the peak voltage of the noise whereas the manufacturer's appears to be a single capture. Nevertheless, the average level of the noisefloor appears identical in both graphs (footnote 2).

Given that all recordings of music have a dynamic range that varies between 13–14 bits at low frequencies and 20 bits in the top audio octave, due to the presence of room and microphone noise, maximizing the measured resolution might be thought to be academic. I therefore spent a month using the Mount Massive DirectStream MK2, fed USB data from Roon via an AudioQuest JitterBug FMJ, as my daily driver. The rest of the system was the pair of Parasound JCA100 Tribute monoblock amplifiers that I reviewed in the June 2024 issue driving either KEF LS50 or GoldenEar BRX loudspeakers. I used Roon's parametric DSP to flatten and extend both loudspeakers' midbass region and controlled volume with the DirectStream's control. After this followup review had been submitted for publication I spent 10 days using the PS Audio with the GoldenEar T66 loudspeakers that I will be reviewing in the August 2024 issue.

My impressions of the PS Audio's sonic character were very similar to those in my original review. The overall balance was easy on the ear, the stereo imaging was precise, with good soundstage depth, and while the DirectStream MK2's retrieval of recorded detail and its sense of low-frequency drive weren't in the same class as those of the MBL N31 that I have been using as a reference D/A processor, my involvement in the music didn't seem compromised.

So, yes, the Mount Massive FPGA upgrade does lower the levels of both ultrasonic and audioband noise, but not to the point where the measured resolution competes with that of the highest-performing processors. Nevertheless, I concluded my 2023 review by writing "for want of a better word, the PS Audio DAC preserved each recording's 'musicality.'" Mount Massive offers the same benefit.—John Atkinson


Footnote 1: The DirectStream MK2 costs $7999 and is sold direct in the US. PS Audio, 4865 Sterling Drive, Boulder, CO 80301. Tel: (800) PSAUDIO, (720) 406-8946. Web:

Footnote 2: Note, also, that the presence of odd-harmonics in the PS Audio graph suggests that the source was not 24-bit dithered data but 16-bit undithered data. This doesn't affect my comments regarding the DirectStream MK2's resolution.

COMPANY INFO
PS Audio
4865 Sterling Drive
Boulder
CO 80301
(800) PSAUDIO
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
hollowman's picture

In one of the PS Audio YT videos, Paul M shows the lobby showcases at PS Audio HQ in Colorado. In them are all the products PSA has developed over their history.
For DACs, there have been several UltraLink models. Here's a Stereophile review from 1995:
https://www.stereophile.com/content/ps-audio-ultralink-two-digital-proce...
It would be curious to re-review a fully-working classic DAC -- and compare/contrast w/the latest DAC.

John Atkinson's picture
hollowman wrote:
It would be curious to re-review a fully-working classic DAC -- and compare/contrast w/the latest DAC.

In 2019 Herb Reichert compared the original PS Audio DirectStream DAC with the 1989 PS Audio Digital Link. See www.stereophile.com/content/gramophone-dreams-28-ps-audio-hifiman.

John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile

hollowman's picture

JA: thx, for the link to the Link!
And I did see that you also measured that old dac in 2019 with modern metrological instruments, like the SYS2722.

The Digital Link used the then-new Burr-Brown 18-Bit DAC chip, the PCM 61P, in a dual set.
In the Link, the entire d/a chip set seems to be:
2 x PCM61P - YM3434 - YM3623B
See:
https://www.dutchaudioclassics.nl/the_complete_d_a_dac_converter_list/

Image here:

https://www.tonepublications.com/media/1-PS.jpg
Some possible issues with Herb Reichert's 2019 comparison might be the age/condition of those eletro caps (are they orig. in his re-review unit ?). Also, the lack of I2S direct input may have compromised sonics between the two units.
As a far as JA's note about Most Significant Bit (MSB) adjustment ... first thru third gen Philips dacs (up to Bitstream) dealt with that issue "expensively" via DEM (dynamic element matching) and external ceramic coupling caps (e.g., the tda1541, on the 3x2 bit active divider pins). Later multi-bit dac chips addressed the MSB issue internally (Philips Continuous Calibration) , as AD did with their AD1862, and trimmer pins, as does the PCM61P . Modern R2R discrete dacs, deal with this via dsp control.

Nota Bene:
Re-measuring (and re-reviewing) older, well-kept gear is a very good idea! It keeps the new-equip manufs in-check; and the 2nd-hand communities (AudioKarma, Audiogon), objectivists (Hydrogenaudio ) and DIY communities all interested and engaged in what mainstream hifi media are ... ahem ... "agenda-ing."

Refs:
https://pdf1.alldatasheet.com/datasheet-pdf/view/56846/BURR-BROWN/PCM61P.html
http://www.lampizator.eu/lampizator/TDA1541%20corner/TDA1541.html

MhtLion's picture

Subjective listening and the musical enjoyment is another thing. But, how I interpret the provided measurement here of PS Audio PerfectWave DirectStream MK2 D/A is that this DAC is not worth its asking price. Personally, these measurement speakes that PS Audio does not have the industry leading engineering pedigree when it comes to a DAC.

I'm not saying this is a bad sound DAC. Not at all because I haven't heard it. But, in order for a company to say 'we know a thing or two about a DAC' it first need to produce a good measurement or at least very good at making elaborated BS claims why they product intentionally sucks at the measurement, which apparently some people buy. Have you tried a popular DACs under $900 with a $100k system? Schiit, Topping, SMSL - They are sounds good playing with systems 10X of their retail price. To say a DAC sounds good - doesn't mean much. I don't remember any bad sounding DAC above $500 in last a couple years. To get a merely sounding good DAC, you don't have to spend $8k. For $8k - it needs to be special. It needs to so good that once taken out of system you miss it, cannot stand without it.

Glotz's picture

But the various online audio communities tell everyone they do. Largely, because they don't have experience listening to the gear, and measurements 'tell' them they don't need to listen.

Yet, when everyone actually listens exhaustively to the SMSL and the Topping DACs compared to $10k plus units, they suffer in image size, depth of field perspective and focus.

Any DAC can be placed in a $100k system and will sound pretty great. It's the DAC at $10k and up that need to justify their position in those systems... and do. They prove it in the listening. There would not be a market for those expensive DACs if not.

By price and measurements, though excellent, you still dismiss the PW DAC.

For a DAC to be 'special', you haven't noted any parameters for such, other than price and measurements.

hollowman's picture

I’ve gone thru Ted Smith’s videos and posts about how DSD “is” the “analog” signal and all one really needs to do is LP filter. That’s a very simple interpretation; please correct me as needed!
I was going thru the HiFiEngine’s schematics and serv. manuals and ran across the Arcam Black Box “Delta” series of DACs.

https://www.hifiengine.com/manual_library/arcam/black-box-500.shtml

And comparing to the master digital chip list on:

https://www.dutchaudioclassics.nl/the_complete_d_a_dac_converter_list

That dutchaudioclassics list has the wrong chipset for the Black Box 500 DAC. Going thru various Black Box schematics, Arcam did what I believe Ted suggests--way back in 1993!!! The TDA1307 is a rare and unique DF, made by Philips, and used various Philips / Marantz products --- including the very high end Marantz SACD unit from 2000.
https://www.stereophile.com/hirezplayers/271/index.html

The 1307 got little attention because the PMD100 chip with HDCD was the hot, attn-grabbing rock star in the mid/late 1990s. The TDA1307 interpolator converts I2S (PCM) to Bitstream (“DSD”). And then Arcam follows that with their own, custom “Bitstream digital to analog converter (DAC)” which may be what Ted had in mind. Not sure. The schematics for the Black Box 500 are readily avail at the usual places. Have a look!

X