Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
Leaving aside the 'country' stuff of which we Europeans know little.
The reality of high fidelity is that there has been near zero improvements in sound quality (other than the computer as a source) in the last twenty or thirty years. It's all hype and BS, mostly from small US companies with no history and little actual technical experience in the field. Assisted of course by the audio press which needs something to fill its pages. Basically they are just 'garden shed' companies.
Sound quality of the better, more experienced, companies has ALWAYS been good.
In the US I would name McIntosh, Pass, Krell, and Audio Research for amplifiers, JBL and the sadly now defunct Snell for speakers. (As an aside, the 'real', as in the six above, US hi-fi industry is surprisingly small considering the size of its population.)
In the UK Quad amplifiers (not their electrostatic speakers as they ARE limited), Naim, Musical Fidelity, and Sugden, and for speakers Tannoy, B&W and Monitor Audio.
And they are all still doing it.
And nowhere near as expensive (with a few exceptions such as Tannoy's 'flagship' Westminster speakers) as that grossly overpriced nonsense from microscopic mostly inexperienced companies few have ever heard of in your report.
Please do not take any of this as a personal criticism. You come over as about the hardest-working member of Stereophile's staff :)