Do you listen to online radio at all? If so, what are your favorites?
Nobody would claim that Web radio sounds great, but sometimes you can't beat the Internet for variety and convenience. Do you ever listen to online "radio"?
Nobody would claim that Web radio sounds great, but sometimes you can't beat the Internet for variety and convenience. Do you ever listen to online "radio"?
<B>CHRIS STAMEY: <I>Travels In the South</I></B><BR>
Yep Roc 2033 (CD). 2004. Chris Stamey, Jefferson Holt, prods.; Don Dixon, Greg Elkins, prods., engs.; Tim Harper, Brian Paulson, John Plymale, Wes Lachot, Logan Matheny, Dan Korneff, engs. AAD. TT: 52:30<BR>
Performance <B>****</B><BR>
Sonics <B>***</B>
I recently came across a 1998 report, "<A HREF="http://www.conference-board.org/publications/describe.cfm?id=398">Expla… the Computer Productivity Paradox</A>," by Kevin Stiroh and Robert H. McGuckin III, that discussed the apparent fact that the widespread use of computers has not resulted in any significant increase in worker productivity. This is indeed a paradox, as my experience in the magazine business has left me with the opposite impression. We all do more, with less, than at any earlier time.
<I>All the world, even you<BR>Should learn to love the way I do</I>—Bryan Ferry, "Take a Chance with Me"
Leaving aside for a moment the fact that the Wavac SH-833 costs $350,000/pair—
XM on a roll: Recent marketing efforts appear to be paying off for XM Satellite Radio. On July 2, the satellite radio startup announced that it had exceeded the 2.1-million subscriber mark during the second quarter. More than 418,000 new subscribers signed up during that period—over twice the number recruited in the same quarter last year. XM-compatible products are appearing at an ever-increasing number of retail outlets, leading some observers to believe that the company may have a fighting chance in the long run.
Audiophiles of every stripe know that achieving a realistic soundstage is maddeningly elusive—some would say impossible. When a system is right for some recordings, it's far off for others.
Would a piece of Krell electronics be the crowning jewel on your equipment rack?
Most audiophiles are generally loathe to think that they'd run their main audio systems from a computer. Last time <A HREF="http://cgi.stereophile.com/cgi-bin/showvote.cgi?346">we ran a poll</A>, answers such as this one from David L. Wyatt, Jr. were typical: "Why in the world would I hook my computers to my stereo? If I want to make a compilation CD of the music I have purchased, I'll just burn one."
We begin with a January 1993 article from Robert Harley called <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/reference/193jitter">The Jitter Game</A>. RH explains, "Clock jitter is a serious and underestimated source of sonic degradation in digital audio. Only recently has jitter begun to get the attention it deserves, both by high-end designers and audio academics."