You can find the measurements of my 1978 samples of the LS3/5a here, and a comparison of their measurements with those of a 1996 KEF sample here. The Stirling LS3/5a V2 offered the same low sensitivity as the original, 82.5dB(B)/2.83V/m, but its impedance (fig.1) is closer to the final KEF version than the original. The peak of 34.8 ohms at 81Hz reveals the tuning frequency of the sealed enclosure, and implies only modest LF extension. Other than dips to 7.5 ohms at 171Hz and 9.7 ohms at 20kHz, the Stirling's impedance stays well above 10 ohms at all audio…

search
Digital Sources: Classé cdp-202 DVD/CD player, Ayre C-5xe universal player; Mark Levinson No.30.6, Benchmark DAC 1 D/A processors; Slim Devices Squeezebox WiFi music processor with Apple Mac mini running OSX for media storage.
Preamplifiers: Mark Levinson No.326S, Audio Research Reference 3, Ayre K-5xe.
Power Amplifiers: Mark Levinson No.33H monoblocks, Halcro dm38.Loudspeakers: Revel Ultima Studio, Era Design 4, Harbeth HL-P3ES2, PSB Alpha B1, Rogers LS3/5a (1978 samples).
Cables: Digital: Kimber Illuminations Orchid AES/EBU, AudioQuest…
Description: Two-way, sealed-box, stand-mounted loudspeaker. Drive-units: 0.75" (25mm) Mylar-dome tweeter, 4.5" (110mm) Bextrene-cone woofer. Crossover frequency: 3kHz. Crossover slopes: not specified. Frequency response: 80Hz-20kHz ±3dB at 1m with grilles on. Sensitivity: 82dB/W/m. Nominal impedance: 16 ohms (1977-1984); 10 ohms (1989 onward). Amplifier requirements: 50W maximum.
Dimensions: 12" H by 7.5" W by 6.25" D. Enclosure volume: 5 liters. Weight: 11.7 lbs each.
Serial numbers of review samples: S0429 & #S0430 (1976 pair), none noted…
Coming to the PSB after an extended diet of dipole listening via the Apogee Stages, I had a bit of sonic gear-shifting to do. I'm not one to sing the praises of one or another particular design approach—the "all else is gaslight" school of thought. But dipoles and forward radiators excite the room in such different ways that changing from one to the other inevitably involves a period of readjustment to what is, to a degree, an "altered" listening environment.
Once I was over that (thankfully brief) period of acclimatization, the PSBs presented me with an open, detailed, clear…
Fig.1 shows the impedance (magnitude and phase) of the PSB. Note that it does drop below 4 ohms from 70 to 400Hz. This indicates that some caution should be exercised in the choice of amplifier, but should not cause a problem with most well-designed separates. The port is tuned to about 27Hz, shown by the minimum at that frequency.
Fig.1 PSB Stratus Gold, electrical impedance (solid) and phase (dashed) (2 ohms/vertical div.).
Fig.2 is the (MLSSA-derived) impulse response of the PSB. Visible is a small amount of ultrasonic ringing,…
Six years. Has it really been six years since I first reviewed the $2100/pair PSB Stratus Gold loudspeakers? More, actually—I completed my writeup of the Gold at the end of 1990, and the review appeared in the February 1991 Stereophile. Since that original review, Stereophile reviewers (myself included) have heard the Stratus Golds at trade shows and elsewhere—certainly enough to renew our confidence in the product and justify its continued recommendation. But we have not had samples to audition in our own…
The original PSB Stratus Gold has been a consistent presence in Stereophile's "Recommended Components" listing since Thomas J. Norton first reviewed it in February 1991 (Vol.14 No.2). Initially launched at a price of $2000/pair, the Gold had crept up to $2100/pair by the end of its seven-year life, which still made this three-way floorstanding design a sonic bargain. When Tom Norton recently did a "Follow-Up" on the original Stratus Gold (Vol.20 No.4, p.247) he concluded that "you can also spend a lot more than…