The Denon CD player, on the other hand, has a surprisingly good headphone output, capable of driving Sennheiser '580s to moderately high levels without…
search
Description: Battery or AC-powered portable headphone amplifier available in three versions: Standard, Premium, Supreme. Number of inputs: one pair, on RCA jacks. Number of outputs: one ¼" stereo headphone jack. Controls: On/Off, Volume, Process On/Bypass, Filter On/Bypass (Supreme only). Input impedance: >50k ohms. Rated input: 0dBU (775mV) Standard; 4dBU (1.24V) Premium & Supreme. Rated output: 22mW into 100 ohms, Standard; 60mW into 100 ohms, Premium & Supreme. Maximum output (0.02% THD at 1kHz): 400mW into 100 ohms (equivalent to 6.32V RMS). THD:…
The HeadRoom amplifier was non-inverting for all control settings, and its input impedance was a little lower than specification at 21k ohms at 1kHz (footnote 1). Channel separation in Bypass mode was better than 70dB at low frequencies, worsening to 37.5dB at 20kHz due to capacitive coupling between the channels, probably between the parallel pcb tracks carrying the signals to the volume control. The HeadRoom's background noise was a little higher than I expected, its S/N ratio measuring about 62dB (unweighted, 22Hz-22kHz, ref. 1V). (An earlier sample of the…
HeadRoom's $399 HeadRoom Supreme headphone amplifier seemed the logical comparison to the Audio Alchemy HPA v1.0/PS3. The portable HeadRoom can run off either a small wall-wart, or an external four-D-cell power pack. I prefer its sound with the battery pack, so I used that for my comparisons.
They were both very good, but the Audio Alchemy sounded just a shade coarser, with a bit of grit in the upper octaves. On "Third Uncle," from Brian Eno's Taking Tiger Mountain (by Strategy), remastered and Super-Bit-Mapped on…
With typical program material, lossless coding can cut the bit-rate by at least a factor of…
Dolby AC-3
Two of the five proposals for high-definition TV currently being tested by the FCC employ AC-2 coding for stereo sound. At the NAB convention, Tom Holman of Lucasfilm went a step farther. He reviewed the psychoacoustic factors that affect the perception of timbre and imaging, concluding that the…
Size does matter, I guess. I was talking to Shure staffers at their booth at Home Entertainment 2003 last June. I had always had a problem with such in-ear headphones as the industry-standard Etymotics, and was explaining that I was getting on no better with the review samples of Shure's then-new, $499 E5c in-ear cans. With what I now knew to be my wider-than-normal ear canals, I had not been able to get the supplied sleeves, foam or soft plastic, to seal properly. The result was sound that seriously…
Description: Lightweight, sound-isolating, in-ear headphones, with foam or soft flex sleeves and 1/8", gold-plated 3.5mm stereo plug. Impedance (at 1kHz): 26 ohms. Sensitivity (at 1kHz): 115dB/mW. Supplied accessories: Personal Fit Kit with three sizes of flex and ultra-soft flex sleeves, one pair of foam sleeves; nylon carrying case.
Dimensions: Weight: 0.9oz (28gm). Cable length: 60" (1.52m).
Serial number of unit reviewed: N/A.
Price: $179. Extra foam sleeves, $21.20/20; extra flex sleeves, $12.60/10. Approximate number of dealers: sold direct. Warranty…