Monitor Audio Gold 300 6G loudspeaker Martin's Measurements

Sidebar 4: Martin's Measurements

On axis, the primary frequency response measured respectably flat out to 12kHz with a minor, narrow prominence in the 14–18kHz range that was only present directly on axis. Output continued beyond audibility before finally settling at –10dB at a nicely extended 33kHz. Notably absent was the resonant peak often seen at or above 20kHz; its absence here is no doubt due to this tweeter's pleated-ribbon design (footnote 1). Whether coincidental or not, the high treble sounded sweet and never drew attention to itself.

Tested on axis, pair matching was excellent, the differences holding to ±1.5dB limits from 100Hz to 20kHz. I estimated sensitivity at an industry-typical 88.5dB/2.83V/m. At normal loudness, the two ports (which share the same volume) shared a tuning frequency of about 33Hz. Blocking one port will lower the system tuning frequency meaningfully, to about 28Hz, and taper the alignment if this is useful to deal with increasing room gain at low frequencies. The listening panel and I preferred single-port operation, so we blocked the upper port. Blocking both ports provided a near sealed-box condition, which could be useful in an awkward room or when placed near the front wall. Checked for spurious higher-frequency output, the upper port read a fine –40dB, and in most installations this port will be blocked. The lower port was quieter, at –53dB, and judged inaudible by the panel.

The optimal listening axis was found to lie at a glancing 5° off-axis laterally, halfway between the midpoints of the tweeter and the midrange driver. On this axis from 100Hz to 15kHz, we observed close, ±2dB limits, which suggests excellent driver integration. Good focus was noted here. There is a small prominence at 16kHz, which I think is likely inaudible. Even at 30° off-axis laterally, output was judged very uniform at ±2.5dB from 200Hz to 15kHz, which implies excellent imaging and natural in-room timbre.

I heard the effect of installing the grilles as a slight dulling with some loss of focus and dynamic expression. In terms of measured behavior, the grilles introduced ±3dB response variations in the range of 5–8kHz and a 2dB loss above 12kHz. Most owners will leave the off. In my large room, the bass was extended to 36Hz at –3dB and a low 25Hz at –6dB, though this was more informative of a good phase response than physical bass pressure (footnote 2).

When standing, a discriminating listener would notice a dip in the vicinity of the mid-treble crossover frequency; a seated listener would hear no such effect, as the output was well integrated on and below the tweeter axis. For a person of my moderate stature, this tall speaker sounded best tilted down a few degrees, aimed at my seated ear height; if you sit too far below the axis, the speaker will be less expressive.

Averaged over the room space, I found very uniform frequency response, particularly in the subjectively dominant range from 100Hz to 5kHz; as previously noted, the drivers were well integrated. In room, the Gold 300 6G displayed the expected, gradual directivity-driven decline in the octave up to the 20kHz test limit.

I had heard on the grapevine that these speakers were powerful. They are! They took a 100W sinewave at 35Hz before distortion became audible. They also survived a 20V RMS (50W) short-term signal at 30Hz with only mildly audible distortion; this distortion would likely be inaudible on program music due to aural masking. Further tests found low distortion throughout the audible range, typically measuring 0.1% to 0.15% at realistic listening powers.

Midband harmonic distortion was commendably low with a fairly loud 1V input at 350Hz, a little above middle C. The only harmonics seen were low in level and subjectively innocuous: –59dB (0.12%) of second-harmonic distortion and –62dB (0.08%) of third-harmonic distortion. No other harmonics were above –70dB. This is commendably low-distortion performance, especially in the range where it matters most. Such low distortion may be why I experienced so little listening fatigue.—Martin Colloms


Footnote 1: JA's measurements indicated that the resonance lay above 30kHz.

Footnote 2: Loudspeaker bass is a high-pass filter whose order and damping will control bass quality. What you get in a given room will depend on the room acoustic and where object source and subject listener are each placed.

COMPANY INFO
Monitor Audio
24 Brook Rd.
Rayleigh, Essex SS6 7XJ
England, UK
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
DavidMA's picture

I enjoy reading about the Monitor Audio products, that always seem to deliver great sound for their price. It would be great to hear about their unconventional Hyphn speaker!!

Glotz's picture

While I haven't owned dynamic speakers for some time, I've found that screws/bolts have a tendency to become loose after years of playing.

It seems intuitive as blasting hundreds of watts of musical energy into an 'expanding' box over time would lend to loosening of components. This bolt tuning system seems like an ideal way of maintaining balance over time.

Aside from the application of tuning to taste, I wonder how the '300's would sound after a few years. Would it require slightly tighter adjustments?

Thanks for another review!

Glotz's picture

Legend.

remlab's picture

having a line of tune-able loudspeakers, the difference being the tensioning "bolts" were placed on the sides of the speakers. It would be interesting to see a speaker with both side and rear tensioning bolts so all four sides could be tensioned/tuned to ones liking.

Herb Reichert's picture

when it came out.

And used it as a guide for my own amateur experiments.

Thank you for writing it.

herb

celef's picture

I am not sure i trust the effect of those driver mounting bolts, on flimsy boxes i can imagine there is some effect when tighten or losen such bolts, but on these boxes that seems so solidly built i am sceptic of the effects described

lumbarear's picture

Thanks for this review - Monitor Audio is underrated and underappreciated by the audio press. As the owner of Monitor's 6G Silver 500 model, the dual 8" sibling of the Gold 300s, I have two encouragements for would-be buyers:

* Break-in time is recommended in the manual, and for me it was lengthy. YMMV but mine took about three weeks of 24/7 using white or pink noise and real music at low and listening volumes. In fact, don't listen to them during break-in because everything from Madonna to Mozart to Metallica sounds like it was recorded in the exact same space. I wanted to cry. Later I did when I discovered...

* That the midrange sings when the stock footers are replaced by IsoAcoustics Gaia footers. WOW - that made the speakers musical and emotionally involving in my room. I think some of their more recent models now actually come stock with IsoAcoustic footers, but I may be mistaken. What I do know is they are awesome with my speakers in my system/room - highly recommended.

Thank you Monitor Audio for creating a reasonably priced, high performance product that delivers so. much. quality. Thank you thank you!

Bridgemix's picture

Modern day news media has trained me to try to separate what is implied by an author, and what is fact. A red flag went up when I read Monitor Audio’s release notes of their new Gold G6 HDT drivers.
“HDT draws on the design of the RDT III cones utilised in Hyphn and the Platinum Series,
which consist of a Nomex honeycomb layer sandwiched between aluminium and carbon fibre skins.
The new HDT cone employs a hexagonal pattern to disrupt symmetries in the
cone breakup,”
They do not specifically say that the new HTD driver has multiple layers, but rather the HDT cone “draws” from the design of the RDT III cones (that happen to have multiple layers). I attempted to do a bit of an investigation. The photos in the MA brochure for the Gold G5 series distinctly shows the multiple layers of the RDT II cone. In the Gold G6 brochure, it appears that the HDT cone is single skinned. I decided that the new HDT cones must not have multiple layers.
This review states that the G6’s HDT cones are multi-layered (similar to the PL200). Are they really?

Benny Patana's picture

I must say I find Martin's discussion about the tension rods more than a bit disconcerting. Are we really to believe that buyers have to adjust the factory settings just to get a good sound? What was the manufacturer's take on this? In any case, unless a specific torque setting is provided, Martin's quarter turn dictum is meaningless. We don't how tight or loose he had the tension rods before making that sonically optimising quarter turn that Charlie was able to hear after "just a few bars"! Martin's conception of "taking up the slack" may be different from yours or mine. So there seems to be zero repeatability here. MA need to tighten up their instructions (pun intended) and possibly their QA if the sonic difference really was more than just placebo.

X