Columns Retired Columns & Blogs |
I feel as though I have attended vicariously.
Helps keep the audio spark going!
“Roundup? Is it ever over? Maybe it was the perfect storm with a dismal day outside and people working from home, but it seemed as though Friday was the busiest Friday that I can remember. The crowds started rolling in at 8:30 AM"—the show opened at 10:00—"as we were setting up the computers and didn’t stop all weekend. This year CAF was like a well-oiled 3-ring circus, having:
Mark Block, Co-Head, New York Audiophile Society: "My takeaway: More people plus more rooms equals good energy without excessive crowding. And there were a lot of great sounding rooms! Yes, there were 'ear stinkers,' as usual, but the overall quality was remarkable. I even experienced a bit of 'good-sound overload,' sometimes not giving enough credit to systems that were merely very good. Plotting sound quality on a bell curve, the big bulge in the curve shifted towards the higher-end this year. Having attended dozens of audio shows over three decades, this is the first one where I came home, played my system, and thought: 'It could be much better.'
"Although some of the best sounding rooms were way beyond my means, several great systems were reasonably priced. Astronomically expensive equipment is always fun to hear, but it's nice to know that speakers under $15k-sometimes well under, and even full systems at that price-can be competitive with the cost-no-object stuff. One caveat: Budget turntables and cartridges are great, but they cannot compete with the best.
"Speaking of analog, LP playback provided some of the nicest sound in Rockville. As luck would have it, there was a big selection of vinyl for sale, new and used, at prices that did not seem to reflect the inflation of 2022. For the digital guys (I can swing both ways), streamers sounded better than ever-once the hotel's wi-fi issues were overcome. Unfortunately, on the first day of the show not all the digital rooms had that figured out."
Vinh Vu, Gingko Audio (My oldest audiophile buddy, from whom I bought a Musical Fidelity tube buffer in 1993): "Believe it or not, the pandemic gave us time to devote to research and development of new products. We introduced the Vibration Control Solutions (VCS) Toolkit this year to provide audiophiles a holistic and systematic approach to controlling vibration in audio systems of all price ranges.
"Younger audiophiles are into high-end headphones in a big way. They have multiple setups for the home, office, and even for the commute. High-end headphones have seen new technical advances and products driving high market demands."
Maryland's Chris Armbruster, Cashformusic.com, Vinyl Retailer: "Every year I think I need to change my approach for CAF. I think I need to do more reissues. This year, like last year, confirmed to me that if I can work hard finding quality used records of all styles, people will be happy. The explosion of reissue vendors is certainly sucking some dollars out of the room, but it also brings new vinyl buyers and introduces them to my world of vintage records. I'm grateful because each year there are more customers digging my stuff.
"If I've seen any trend, it's that you gotta try and have everything. Not long ago it was a waste of time to bring pop rock and soul records. Ten years ago records by Fleetwood Mac, Billy Joel and Elton John couldn't command $1. Now everything sells. This year I brought a lot of original British pressings by Pink Floyd, Jethro Tull, King Crimson. The people ponying up $100 a record were in their 20s and 30s.
"And in the past, there might be one or two serious buyers that were women, now there are dozens. Same with buyers under 30. There was a kid today, under 20, whose goal is to collect every Broadway show and soundtrack. God bless 'em.
"In the ten or so years of doing Capital Audio Fest Gary Gill has really created an amazing event. In the beginning it seemed I sold mostly to vendors, manufacturers, and hardcore collectors. Records were either $100 or one buck. Now, like the record business everywhere, more people are jumping in. It doesn't take much to entice them with the variety that used vinyl vendors, like me, offer. People enjoy the hunt.
"Note to self: FIND MORE QUALITY RECORDS. They will sell."
And that, audiophile ladies and gentlemen, is a wrap. I sincerely hope you enjoyed our coverage half as much as I enjoyed writing it.
I feel as though I have attended vicariously.
Helps keep the audio spark going!
50 years of making you unhappy, and yet to you remain.
You could be a character in an Edward Albee play.
I have been listening since the 1970s; I couldn't tell you if Stereophile even publishes a printed magazine, not just on my news feed. They don't receive a penny of mine; II hadn't bought one of their magazines since the mid-1990s when Roger Russel of McIntosh labs stated they were in bed with wire companies for ad money. Or maybe you believe, "This new speaker cable opened up a beautiful boutique of soundstage" crap. Go to Audio Science Review for the real world, and compare speakers in mono, computer analysis of equipment has been available for nearly thirty years, and so-called expert reviewers are over.
Do you turn to stone if hit by sunlight?
Hihi . Still, you got to feel sorry for grumpy old, miserable men.
Picture this guy at the Disc Golf forums opining that Disc Golf isn't 'real golf' and he knows what 'real golf' is and this isn't it and all those different discs are stupid and he doesn't spend his money there and they should all go over to the 'real golf' forum for a proper dose of reality.
And you know he will be back to boast about never coming here.
... bag comment. Then go back to ASR. How old are you? 13? What are you doing here?
...have replaced sound with a belief system. You have a faith in instrument reviewing powered by the generally faulty findings produced by shoddy methods.
If it speaks to sound at all it does so peripherally. Mostly it's just loud, arrogant gatekeeping and audio woke.
I also have a belief. When I see invasive species like yours I assume the writer is deaf and has compensated. Of the two beliefs, it's infinitely more plausible.
Don't you pity the poor individuals whose systems are so sad they cannot hear the difference and then blame the reviewer(s). So unfortunate.
the single ugliest photo I have ever seen opening an article on Stereophile. When I saw it on the home page I nearly gagged.
Is he supposed to be the archetypical Stereophile reader? (He's the right age.)
...no favors using that photo. The lens knows not how successful he is. Surely another, better shot could have been taken.
Also speaks to how SP is, er, produced, that there's no caption, so for a reader scanning the home page it looks like old man audiophile clip art. (I gather that this is probably a limitation of your platform, but still.) One has to open the article and read to the end of the first graf of the story to learn his name, after which many pubs would have appended "(pictured)" for clarity.
That said, thank you Jason for clarifying.