Similarly…

search
The ESL-63 maintained a firm hold on its Grade B…
Each of my vintage ESL-63s has a sliding wood top and a base plinth of black plastic embossed with the company's name. The ESL-…
Sound
Set up near the corners of my large listening room, the Quad ESL-989s…
Description: Full-range electrostatic loudspeaker. Power capacity: 100W, 10V RMS, 40V peak maximum signal input. Program peak for undistorted output: 40V. Permitted peak input: 55V. Impedance: 8 ohms nominal, 6.2 ohms minimum. Sensitivity: 86dB/2.83V/m. Frequency response: 30Hz-20kHz, ±6dB.
Dimensions: 52" (1335mm) H by 26" (670mm) W by 12.25" (315mm) D. Weight: 55.7 lbs (25.3kg) net.
Finishes: black, blue, or silver.
Serial numbers of units reviewed: 901969, 901970, 9890003, 9890004.
Price: $7999/pair. Approximate number of dealers: 20.
…
Analog source: Linn Sondek LP12/Lingo turntable, Ittok tonearm, Spectral moving-coil cartridge.
Digital sources: Krell KRC-28 CD transport, Sony SCD-C555ES multichannel SACD player.
FM tuners: Day-Sequerra FM Reference Classic, Rotel RH-10, Magnum Dynalab MD-102 with Model 205 Sleuth RF amplifier, Fanfare FT-1A.
Preamplification: Krell KCT, Sony TA-P9000ES, Mark Levinson ML-7A with L-2 phono section, Conrad-Johnson Premier 18LS preamplifiers; Duntech MX-10 moving-coil, Margulis phono preamplifiers.
Power amplifiers: Mark Levinson No.334, Krell…
Although the different kind of interaction between a panel speaker and the room can make it sound louder than its measured sensitivity would suggest, the Quad ESL-989 is still on the low side, at an estimated 83dB(B)/2.83V/m. Given its strict 100W power handling, this puts quite a low ceiling on its maximum loudness capability, as LG found. Over most of the audioband the Quad is not a difficult load for an amplifier to drive, the impedance (fig.1) remaining above 6 ohms from 32Hz to 3.7kHz and from 18kHz to 32kHz. And though the magnitude drops to below 4 ohms at…
Beginning in 1982, the Quad ESL-63 had a fine 15-year run as one of the most recommendable loudspeakers ever, offering as it did a combination of clarity, balance, musicality, and adaptability that few could match. During much of its life, the '63 also sold for a reasonable price compared to anything else that dared call itself "the best," and while it might sound cynical to say so, the cachet of being an electrostatic panel in a world of plain-Jane boxes didn't hurt, either. The ESL-63 was a smash.
But all good…
The world of loudspeaker enthusiasts, divides readily into three camps: those who love horns, those who love panels, and everyone else. Though perhaps dwarfed by the third group, what the first two lack in numbers they make up for in passion. Art Dudley writes about this divide in his "Listening" column this month, and while I've never gone down the horn route to happiness, I have at various times in my life dabbled with panel speakers. I owned a pair of original Quads for a long time, and MartinLogan Aeriuses and…