Description
The SC26 looks functional and slim. The…
search
I had been sent a sample of the Woodside SC26 tube preamplifier during my June 1994 review of Woodside's MA50 monoblock amplifier (Vol.17 No.6). Although I used a number of preamplifiers during that review, I was most impressed with the MA50s' spacious, three-dimensional soundstage when driven by the SC26. At the time, I had an impression that the SC26's sonics combined a midrange richness with a good dynamic range. Although I had to return the Woodside MA50s to the importer after I reviewed them, I continued listening to the SC26.
Each plate of the dual-triode cathode follower tube is fed by a separate 300V regulated supply. The filament supplies are unusual in that rather than power the tubes from a 12V source, the SC26 drives one side of the filaments from 60V and the other from 72V. By raising the filament voltages closer to the operating point of the cathode, the tube is said to run quieter.
Sound
I traced the SC26's initial hum problems to a faulty ECC83, which Woodside replaced with a Golden Dragon 12AX7. The SC26 was then as quiet as my solid-state preamplifiers—at least on casual listen. I detected…
Sidebar 1: Specifications
Description: Tube preamplifier with built-in/optional internal moving-coil transformer stage. Unit can be ordered as a line model (L) or a phono model (P) set up for either moving-coil or moving-magnet cartridges. Inputs: five single-ended line level, one phono (either MC or MM), Tuner, Video, Tape 1, Tape 2, CD. Outputs: single-ended main out, buffered tape out. Frequency response: 5Hz–50kHz, ±1dB, line; ±0.25dB, phono. RIAA accuracy: ±0.25dB. S/N Ratio (A-weighted): 85dB (line), 80dB (phono). Distortion (THD): !x0.1%. Input impedance: 47k ohms, line; 47k ohms…
Sidebar 2: Setup
My large listening room is 26' long by 13' wide, and has a 12' semi-cathedral ceiling. An 8' by 4' doorway at the back of the room opens onto my 25' by 15' kitchen. I also used my second, 17' by 10' listening room.
CDs were played on a Krell MD-1 turntable driving a Krell SBP-32X D/A converter; either a Rotel RHT-10 or a Day-Sequerra FM Reference tuner provided music from New York classical station WQXR; and LPs were played on a Linn Sondek LP12/Lingo turntable, an Ittok arm, and a Spectral MC cartridge.
I compared the SC26 with a Krell KBL preamplifier,…
Sidebar 3: Measurements
The output impedance of the Woodside SC26 at its line output measured a high 2.1k ohms at the maximum setting of the level control, decreasing a bit to 1.7k ohms at unity gain, then returning to 2k ohms at the 9 o'clock setting. The SC26 will therefore be quite sensitive to the loading effects of cables and the input impedance of the power amplifier used; both of the latter should be chosen with care—preferably low-capacitance cables and amplifier input impedances of a minimum of 20k ohms, but the higher the better.
The SC26's line-input impedance measured…
My "Musical Cultural Literacy for Americans" write-in competition seems to have been a smashing success. I received 65 entries, and only a very few missed the mark. A few more were obvious, so-so, or lacking in passion. Many were good. But a score or more were of enviably high quality. Choosing the top 12 was tough. At the end, who won a prize and who did not was entirely my own subjective decision. The winning entries are posted in full on Stereophile's website as an appendix to my April column. Here are the points I made online in announcing the results:
"Here's an idea:…
A letter in response was published in October 2007 (Vol.30 No.10):
Don't lose that number
Editor: Regarding John Marks' call for the "extra-credit essay question" about Steely Dan's "Rikki Don't Lose That Number": No essay required, as your editor, John Atkinson (a fine bass player himself), already knows. The bass line for the tune has no relation to Coltrane's piece but is, in fact, a quote of the bass intro to Horace Silver's "Song for My Father," the Blue Note sessions for which occurred just a month and a half prior to Coltrane's Impulse! recordings.
Sorry, just couldn'…
The most important change made to the system was one that held up the writing of my review of the Mark Levinson No.23.5 power amplifier for several months, such was its anticipated impact. Though my listening room is well-equipped with wall sockets, there are actually only two 15A circuits serving these outlets. Ever since I had converted what had hitherto been our house's master bedroom into my listening room, I had intended to run new circuits to it.
Somehow, there always seemed to be more urgent jobs that needed to be done around the house—new roof, new main drainage, new bathroom, new…
I still have fond memories of my first Krell amplifier, a KSA-50. Back in those days (date purposely omitted), my principal source of audio equipment reviews, aside from Stereophile and The Absolute Sound, was Hi-Fi News & Record Review, which I read voraciously from cover to cover every month. One fateful day while sitting by our community swimming pool, I happened upon an enlightening review of the KSA-50 written by none other than our own John Atkinson, editor of HFN/RR at the time. His words describing "the steamroller-like inevitability of the bass with this amplifier" haunted me…
During one particularly heated listening session, we had a vividly divided camp as to which amplifier best represented the musical performance. Bob Kraft, bass trombonist, and Ken Harbison, percussionist, both felt that while the KSA-250 was more "dynamically impressive," it didn't have enough "meat on the bone," and lacked the immediacy and warmth of the ML No.23. Their priorities, and desired perspective, leaned more to "I want to hear it from the stage." They both felt that while the Krell had more impact, along with broader, higher, and deeper soundstaging, its leaner harmonic character…