Revel Ultima Salon2 loudspeaker JA's Associated Equipment
Back in March 1998, Revel's Ultima Salon1 floorstanding loudspeaker generated quite a stir at <I>Stereophile</I> (<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/96">Vol.22 No.3</A>). Our reviewers were impressed by its seven designed-from-scratch drive-units, its ultramodern enclosure with curved rosewood side panels, exposed front tweeter and midrange, rear-facing reflex port and tweeter, and a flying grille over the mid-woofer and woofers. In the December issue (Vol.22 No.12), the Ultima Salon1 ($16,000/pair) was named <I>Stereophile</I>'s "<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/features/178/index1.html">Joint Speaker of 1999</A>" for its "big bass, timbral accuracy, low distortion, dynamics, lack of compression, and best fit'n'finish."
Revel Ultima Salon2 loudspeaker John Atkinson, March 2009
Back in March 1998, Revel's Ultima Salon1 floorstanding loudspeaker generated quite a stir at <I>Stereophile</I> (<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/96">Vol.22 No.3</A>). Our reviewers were impressed by its seven designed-from-scratch drive-units, its ultramodern enclosure with curved rosewood side panels, exposed front tweeter and midrange, rear-facing reflex port and tweeter, and a flying grille over the mid-woofer and woofers. In the December issue (Vol.22 No.12), the Ultima Salon1 ($16,000/pair) was named <I>Stereophile</I>'s "<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/features/178/index1.html">Joint Speaker of 1999</A>" for its "big bass, timbral accuracy, low distortion, dynamics, lack of compression, and best fit'n'finish."
Back in March 1998, Revel's Ultima Salon1 floorstanding loudspeaker generated quite a stir at <I>Stereophile</I> (<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/96">Vol.22 No.3</A>). Our reviewers were impressed by its seven designed-from-scratch drive-units, its ultramodern enclosure with curved rosewood side panels, exposed front tweeter and midrange, rear-facing reflex port and tweeter, and a flying grille over the mid-woofer and woofers. In the December issue (Vol.22 No.12), the Ultima Salon1 ($16,000/pair) was named <I>Stereophile</I>'s "<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/features/178/index1.html">Joint Speaker of 1999</A>" for its "big bass, timbral accuracy, low distortion, dynamics, lack of compression, and best fit'n'finish."
Revel Ultima Salon2 loudspeaker Associated Equipment
Back in March 1998, Revel's Ultima Salon1 floorstanding loudspeaker generated quite a stir at <I>Stereophile</I> (<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/96">Vol.22 No.3</A>). Our reviewers were impressed by its seven designed-from-scratch drive-units, its ultramodern enclosure with curved rosewood side panels, exposed front tweeter and midrange, rear-facing reflex port and tweeter, and a flying grille over the mid-woofer and woofers. In the December issue (Vol.22 No.12), the Ultima Salon1 ($16,000/pair) was named <I>Stereophile</I>'s "<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/features/178/index1.html">Joint Speaker of 1999</A>" for its "big bass, timbral accuracy, low distortion, dynamics, lack of compression, and best fit'n'finish."
Back in March 1998, Revel's Ultima Salon1 floorstanding loudspeaker generated quite a stir at <I>Stereophile</I> (<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/96">Vol.22 No.3</A>). Our reviewers were impressed by its seven designed-from-scratch drive-units, its ultramodern enclosure with curved rosewood side panels, exposed front tweeter and midrange, rear-facing reflex port and tweeter, and a flying grille over the mid-woofer and woofers. In the December issue (Vol.22 No.12), the Ultima Salon1 ($16,000/pair) was named <I>Stereophile</I>'s "<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/features/178/index1.html">Joint Speaker of 1999</A>" for its "big bass, timbral accuracy, low distortion, dynamics, lack of compression, and best fit'n'finish."
Back in March 1998, Revel's Ultima Salon1 floorstanding loudspeaker generated quite a stir at <I>Stereophile</I> (<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/96">Vol.22 No.3</A>). Our reviewers were impressed by its seven designed-from-scratch drive-units, its ultramodern enclosure with curved rosewood side panels, exposed front tweeter and midrange, rear-facing reflex port and tweeter, and a flying grille over the mid-woofer and woofers. In the December issue (Vol.22 No.12), the Ultima Salon1 ($16,000/pair) was named <I>Stereophile</I>'s "<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/features/178/index1.html">Joint Speaker of 1999</A>" for its "big bass, timbral accuracy, low distortion, dynamics, lack of compression, and best fit'n'finish."
Back in March 1998, Revel's Ultima Salon1 floorstanding loudspeaker generated quite a stir at <I>Stereophile</I> (<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/96">Vol.22 No.3</A>). Our reviewers were impressed by its seven designed-from-scratch drive-units, its ultramodern enclosure with curved rosewood side panels, exposed front tweeter and midrange, rear-facing reflex port and tweeter, and a flying grille over the mid-woofer and woofers. In the December issue (Vol.22 No.12), the Ultima Salon1 ($16,000/pair) was named <I>Stereophile</I>'s "<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/features/178/index1.html">Joint Speaker of 1999</A>" for its "big bass, timbral accuracy, low distortion, dynamics, lack of compression, and best fit'n'finish."
Back in March 1998, Revel's Ultima Salon1 floorstanding loudspeaker generated quite a stir at <I>Stereophile</I> (<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/96">Vol.22 No.3</A>). Our reviewers were impressed by its seven designed-from-scratch drive-units, its ultramodern enclosure with curved rosewood side panels, exposed front tweeter and midrange, rear-facing reflex port and tweeter, and a flying grille over the mid-woofer and woofers. In the December issue (Vol.22 No.12), the Ultima Salon1 ($16,000/pair) was named <I>Stereophile</I>'s "<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/features/178/index1.html">Joint Speaker of 1999</A>" for its "big bass, timbral accuracy, low distortion, dynamics, lack of compression, and best fit'n'finish."
Oh, <a href="http://blog.stereophile.com/stephenmejias/060308criteria/">I forgot to mention</a>: For really dirty records, like those that have been through my many unfortunate basement floods or those that I've picked up from the flea market on 17th Street, I've developed a two-part cleaning process.
I received both my June and July Stereophile Magazines in the mail today. I like the mag but I would enjoy it more if it was a little more spaced out between deliveries.
I received both my June and July Stereophile Magazines in the mail today. I like the mag but I would enjoy it more if it was a little more spaced out between deliveries.
What gives?