Recession and Audio

I know some of us are sick of reading more posts deriding extravagantly priced gear and the people who price them, but I hope this thread rises above the simplistic flame-throwing... today, while reading the Phile's coverage of amplification by a new company called Tenor ($90K monoblocks; $40K preamp) in the CES section, I stumbled upon this passage -


System Building Rules—and How to Break Them

System Building Rules—and How to Break Them

Much has been made of the influence that Linn, Naim, and Rega have had on our ideas about music-system hierarchies: Before they and a handful of other British audio manufacturers kicked off the debate in the 1970s, the conventional wisdom worldwide was that the loudspeaker was more important than the record player, amplifier, or any other link in the domestic audio chain, and thus deserved to be the object of significantly greater care and attention, not to mention investment of cash. But the Brit-fi approach was different, and ostensibly better reasoned: Because musical information that's distorted or dropped entirely by a record player, a CD player, or any other source can't be made right by any other component in the system, it is the source that must be considered the most important component of all, and to which the majority of funds should be allocated.

Give Me a Tenor

Give Me a Tenor

Tenor's promised Tenor Pre preamplifier ($40,000) is a hybrid, using tubes for the input stage and MOSFETs for the output. It should be available in two months. As a whole, the Tenor system (fleshed out with Hansen Emperors and Kubala-Sosna cables) was outstanding.

On the Lamm

On the Lamm

Lamm was driving the new Wilson Maxx series 3 with its 32Wpc ML3 <I>Signature</I> SE triode monoblocks ($139,290/pair). It was my first chance to hear either, so I can't tell you if it was the speakers or the amps that were making the magic happen, but happen it did.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement