There are three basic points every ad writer should bear in mind. First, no advertisement may tell a lie. Lying in ads is dishonest. It is also illegal, so don't. Second, if you have a really good product, tell the truth about it, in tedious detail…

search
The Calculated Omission: If the product you are advertising is really quite good in most respects, but has a few less attractive features, play up its positive qualities to the exclusion of everything else. It is bad practice to try and explain that the aspects in which it is inferior aren't really important, because this will only draw attention to the fact that competing products are better in these respects. Publish a factual-looking spec sheet, but omit the…
No Advertising
Sirs: I do not see how you expect to make a magazine pay off without admitting advertisers, but I suppose you know what you're doing. I hope so, anyway, because after publishing "How to Write an Ad" in your first issue, you certainly won't get any advertisers even if you do decide to accept them.
This kind of thing needed to be said, and I think you chose a perfect way of saying it. Advertisers have been sacred cows for so long that some of them have gotten the impression there is no deceit or misrepresentation they can't get…
Provided that very high sound levels and gut-thumping bass are not required, Tim de Paravicini's small SE amplifier, for example, works just fine with the relatively kind and uniform 6…
One of the problems for someone auditioning a good SE amplifier for the first time is that all audiophiles have a psychological need to hear a difference. Some audio differences, while important, are quite subtle. Their analysis requires fine equipment, good circumstances, and, in some cases, extended listening. However, when compared with a conventional, solid-state, or push-pull low-impedance tube amplifier, a single-ended tube amplifier will always sound substantially different. This is due to the complex interaction of an SE design with…
What a fascinating result! The resistor feed dramatically shifted the tonal balance of the Wilson WATT, with the general view that it now sounded more like a free-field-…
These anecdotal tests only go to show the remarkable complexity of sound-quality changes that can result from using an amplifier with a significant source impedance. Even experienced critics—sorry, I do place myself in this category—find it very difficult, if not impossible, to separate these physical and acoustic interactions from the overall perception of sound quality. We have to accept that moderate tone-control effects—unfamiliar response changes over limited sections of the overall frequency range, allied to changes in level—can significantly alter perceived sound quality…
It's not readily appreciated that a loudspeaker's treble balance exercises a powerful control over perceived clarity, right into the midrange. The perception of a loudspeaker's quality hinges strongly on the balance the designer has achieved between the midrange and treble levels—both in the on-axis frequency response and in the acoustic power delivered to the room.
This is very critical, and if a speaker system lacks sufficient clarity, the designer may be led, intuitively or deliberately, to lift the treble power to improve things. It is amazing…