"We had, in Aspen, a perfect opportunity to explore this kind of recording," Drucker said. "And in Da-Hong [Seetoo, producer, recording engineer, and violinist] we found the ideal collaborator. Computer editing stations and the ability for us to take…
search
"I used four Schoeps MK2H omni [microphone] heads on bodies of my own design in a square arrangement in the middle of the Quartet, about 70" from the musicians, going straight to hard drive at 24-bits/44.1kHz. I burned CDs for the Quartet from each day's performances. I edited the sessions using Sound Designs software."
Da-Hong Seetoo designs electronics under the Omnitronics name.—Wes Phillips
BARBER: String Quartet
IVES: String Quartets 1 & 2, Scherzo ("Holding Your Own").
DG 435 864-2
BARBER: The Complete Songs, Dover Beach
HARBISON: String Quartet 2
SCHULLER: String Quartet 3
WERNICK: String Quartet 4
Thomas Hampson, baritone
DG 437 537-2
BARTóK: String Quartets 1-6
DG 423 657-2 (2 CDs)
BEETHOVEN: String Quartets 1-16
DG 447 076-2 (7 CDs)
BEETHOVEN: String Quartet 11
SCHUBERT: String Quartet 14 ("Death and the Maiden")
DG 423 398-2
BEETHOVEN: String Quartet 16
…
Originally a defense and space contractor offering high-performance (and presumably high-cost) analog/digital converters (ADCs), British-based Data Conversion Systems is one of a small number of…
I first used the Elgar as a conventional processor, its level control set to 0dB and its analog outputs feeding the preamplifier. The Elgar was able to lock to all my digital sources in its narrow-window, "Digital" PLL mode, so that was how I used it. The unit runs hot—don't place other components on top of it.
The first series of listening sessions was both satisfying and dissatisfying. Satisfying because the sound was always musical; I enjoyed my favorite CDs and DATs for hours on end, one leading to another. Dissatisfying because I am a professional reviewer, dammit, and…
But it was when I abandoned 16-bit CDs and DATs that the Elgar scaled the highest sonic heights. Not only did my 20- and 24-bit master tapes sound delightful in their analoglike sense of ease; that delicious sense of detail when the processor was used straight into the power amplifier was invaluable when I was editing the 24-bit hard-disk masters for Stereophile's new Rhapsody CD (see June '97, pp.70-81). Choosing the right note on which to splice between two takes is an exacting business. Not only do you need the musical flow to match each side of the edit point, the…
Description: Remote-control D/A processor with volume and balance controls; switchable narrow- and wide-window PLL on data input; 64x-oversampling digital filter; and 5-bit "Ring DAC." Sampling frequencies: 48, 44.1, and 32kHz (standard), plus 96 and 88.2kHz (with dual-AES/EBU software option). Inputs: 2 AES/EBU on XLR jacks, 1 S/PDIF on BNC jack, 1 S/PDIF on RCA jack, 1 S/PDIF on ST-optical, 1 S/PDIF on TosLink optical. Outputs: unbalanced analog on RCA jacks and balanced analog on XLR jacks. Frequency response: "set for optimum transient response." S/N Ratio:…
The main digital source was a Mark Levinson No.31 CD transport feeding the Elgar via Madrigal and Illuminati AES/EBU cables and a Meridian 518 jitter-reduction unit. When I sent my No.31 back to Madrigal for updating to No.31.5 status, I used a Meridian 500 to spin CDs. Master tapes of Stereophile's recordings, some sampled at both 44.1kHz and 96kHz, were played back on a Nagra-D digital tape recorder via AudioQuest's new Digital Two AES/EBU cable, while a Sonic Solutions Macintosh-based Digital Audio Workstation was used for the editing mentioned in the text.…
All measurements were performed at 44.1kHz. With pin 2 of its output XLRs connected as positive, the Elgar was noninverting with its front-panel phase switch set to Normal, inverting with it set to Inverting. The output impedance was very low (in the region of 1 ohm) from the balanced jacks, and somewhat higher (51 ohms) from the unbalanced RCAs. The output levels were inconsequentially lower than specified, at 2.95V/985mV balanced and 2.98V/990mV unbalanced. I haven't shown the Elgar's frequency-response or de-emphasis error graphs: both were flat within ±0.02dB…