With an estimated B-weighted sensitivity of 85dB/2.83V/m, the Aerial 8 will need a reasonably high-powered amplifier to sing at lifelike levels. However, its impedance plot (fig.1) reveals that it only drops below 5 ohms in the upper bass and lower midrange and that the electrical phase angle, other than in the mid-bass, is relatively benign. Other than the small wrinkle in the traces at 25kHz, due to the tweeter's primary dome resonance, this graph is free from cabinet-induced problems. The "saddle" in the magnitude trace at 20Hz indicates the tuning of the large…
search
Shortly after finishing my audition of the Wilson CUB, I set up the very same pair of Aerial Acoustics 8s recently reviewed for Stereophile by Michael Fremer (January 1998). This loudspeaker will cost you approximately $1000/pair less than the Wilson, depending on finish and the price of the stands you choose for the CUB.
The Aerial is a little more open-sounding on top, with a less vivid overall balance than the CUB. I never heard any recognizable midrange coloration from it. It goes very…
When the Aerial Acoustics Model 8 loudspeakers reviewed by Michael Fremer (Stereophile, January '98) arrived in Santa Fe, I had them delivered to my listening room for an audition immediately after John Atkinson had finished measuring them. My room is considerably larger than MF's, and less sensitive to the sometimes difficult-to-accommodate bass of big loudspeakers, if not exactly immune to it—for a long time I favored room-diagonal positioning for many loudspeakers. But the addition of several SWALS…
According to a recent article in The Economist (footnote 1), the explosion in…
As a writer and editor, I was relatively quick to appreciate the advantages offered by word processors over typewriters, and have built up quite a body of experience over the last nine years with a variety of…
Figs.1 and 2 were generated using special digital data—digital "black" with a single sample high. In practice, all transients on a CD will have passed through an A/D…
The $5995 Mark Levinson No.39 was reviewed by Wes Phillips in the November 1997 issue of Stereophile. Like the Wadia, the Levinson has a built-in volume control, except that it operates in the analog domain. It also has digital inputs and outputs, so I compared the D/A sections by driving the Wadia from the No.39 via the 0.5m length of Mod Squad Wonderlink I. Again, levels were matched at 1kHz.
I found differences much harder to detect than with the BAT player, which is not surprising given that both solid-state players use similar DAC and output op-amp chips. The…
Description: Single-box CD player with remote control, digital-domain volume control, 32x-oversampling DigiMaster decoding software operating with 24-bit precision, and balanced and unbalanced analog outputs. Digital inputs and outputs are optional. Digital resolution: 21 bits. Maximum output level: adjustable from 250mV to 4.4V to optimize volume-control action (4.4V RMS default). Measured frequency response: -3dB at 20kHz. Output impedance: <15 ohms. Power consumption: 25W.
Dimensions: 17" W by 7" H (including 0.5" spiked feet) by 16" D. Weight: 42 lbs.…