Real businesses are moving into territory explored by the upstarts. On August 2, <A HREF="http://www.umusic.com/">Universal Music Group</A>, the world's largest record label, announced that it will begin offering, on a trial basis, digital downloads of recordings from its massive catalog. The experiment is scheduled to begin this week, with an initial offering of about 60 songs from artists in several genres, including operatic tenor Luciano Pavarotti, jazz guitarist George Benson, and pop band Blink 182.

For the millions of fans who search the Internet for their favorite music, one thing always required is the name of the artist or song sought. But what if you don't know exactly what you want to hear, and would rather search for the <I>kind</I> of music that suits your mood?

Tempted to just cut'n'paste his earlier Arcam integrated amplifier review into his rundown of the <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com//digitalsourcereviews/251/">Arcam FMJ CD23 CD player</A>, Lonnie Brownell explains that, "after all, it's the same story: British manufacturer gives highly praised product a slick new case to entice those who find their Alpha line too downscale in appearance, adds a few internal tweaks to make it a bit more interesting, and kicks the price up by $400." Instead, he does the right thing in a complete review that even answers the vital question: Should this Arcam be your last CD player?

The last week of July was a busy one for music industry attorneys, and by some measure a sucessful one. As almost everyone in the world is aware, on Wednesday, July 26, the <A HREF="http://www.riaa.com/">Recording Industry Association of America</A> won a round in its fight against <A HREF="http://www.napster.com/">Napster</A&gt;, a San Mateo, CA-based software company that enables the sharing of MP3 music files over the Internet. On that day, in a US Federal court in San Francisco, Judge Marilyn Patel decreed that the widespread sharing of music using Napster was a form of wholesale copyright violation, and ordered the service shut down effective Friday, July 28 at midnight. Napster appealed and won a stay of Judge Patel's injunction that will enable it to remain online and in business until at least mid-September.

The last week of July was a busy one for music-industry attorneys&mdash;and, by some measures, a successful one. As almost everyone in the world is aware, on Wednesday, July 26, the <A HREF="http://www.riaa.com/">Recording Industry Association of America</A> (RIAA) won a round in its fight against <A HREF="http://www.napster.com/">Napster</A&gt;, a San Mateo, California&ndash;based software company that enables the sharing of MP3 music files over the Internet. On that day, in a US Federal court in San Francisco, Judge Marilyn Patel decreed that the widespread sharing of music using Napster was a form of wholesale copyright violation, and ordered the service shut down effective midnight on Friday, July 28. Napster, in turn, appealed and won a stay of execution two days after Judge Patel's ruling that will enable it to remain online and in business until at least mid-September.

In December, after months of conducting listening tests with audio professionals in the US, the <A HREF="http://www.sdmi.org/">Secure Digital Music Initiative</A> (SDMI) choose a watermarking technology from <A HREF="http://www.verance.com/">Verance Corporation</A> for DVD-Audio copyright protection. Test results had indicated that Verance's system was the least detectable of the contenders under consideration.

The recent <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/news/10809/">struggle</A&gt; between the RIAA and Napster may seem like a distant battle rumbling off in some foreign realm, far removed from most audiophiles: about once a week we get e-mails asking why a high-end audio website should even cover such stuff.

It is <I>so</I> tempting.

It is <I>so</I> tempting.