Ortofon MC-3000 MC phono cartridge J. Gordon Holt, November 1988

Ortofon MC-3000 MC phono cartridge J. Gordon Holt, November 1988

The <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/phonocartridges/ortofon_mc-2000_mc_phono_car… MC-2000</A> may just have been the most impractical cartridge to be unleashed upon the audio community for some years. With a high compliance (20cu) that made it ill-suited for most tonearms, it also had a preposterously low signal output of 50 microvolts, which gave new meaning to the terms hum and noise. Few MC preamps had enough gain to deliver adequate driving voltage to a system, and none of those that did had low enough noise to be usable with the 2000. If the problem wasn't hum, it was hiss; if hiss was acceptably low, there would be too much hum. At least Ortofon had the sense to be aware of the problem and to do something about it, in the form of their T-2000 step-up transformer, which is the only device I ever found that would allow the cartridge to be operated without a constant background of hum or hiss. Despite all this, I have used the MC-2000 as my reference cartridge for the last two years. Why? Because of all the cartridges I've tried, it is by far the most accurate.

Ortofon
(914) 733-3399
www.ortofon.com

Ortofon MC-3000 MC phono cartridge Alvin Gold, October 1988

Ortofon MC-3000 MC phono cartridge Alvin Gold, October 1988

The <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/phonocartridges/ortofon_mc-2000_mc_phono_car… MC-2000</A> may just have been the most impractical cartridge to be unleashed upon the audio community for some years. With a high compliance (20cu) that made it ill-suited for most tonearms, it also had a preposterously low signal output of 50 microvolts, which gave new meaning to the terms hum and noise. Few MC preamps had enough gain to deliver adequate driving voltage to a system, and none of those that did had low enough noise to be usable with the 2000. If the problem wasn't hum, it was hiss; if hiss was acceptably low, there would be too much hum. At least Ortofon had the sense to be aware of the problem and to do something about it, in the form of their T-2000 step-up transformer, which is the only device I ever found that would allow the cartridge to be operated without a constant background of hum or hiss. Despite all this, I have used the MC-2000 as my reference cartridge for the last two years. Why? Because of all the cartridges I've tried, it is by far the most accurate.

Ortofon
(914) 733-3399
www.ortofon.com

Ortofon MC-3000 MC phono cartridge System Details

Ortofon MC-3000 MC phono cartridge System Details

The <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/phonocartridges/ortofon_mc-2000_mc_phono_car… MC-2000</A> may just have been the most impractical cartridge to be unleashed upon the audio community for some years. With a high compliance (20cu) that made it ill-suited for most tonearms, it also had a preposterously low signal output of 50 microvolts, which gave new meaning to the terms hum and noise. Few MC preamps had enough gain to deliver adequate driving voltage to a system, and none of those that did had low enough noise to be usable with the 2000. If the problem wasn't hum, it was hiss; if hiss was acceptably low, there would be too much hum. At least Ortofon had the sense to be aware of the problem and to do something about it, in the form of their T-2000 step-up transformer, which is the only device I ever found that would allow the cartridge to be operated without a constant background of hum or hiss. Despite all this, I have used the MC-2000 as my reference cartridge for the last two years. Why? Because of all the cartridges I've tried, it is by far the most accurate.

Ortofon
(914) 733-3399
www.ortofon.com

Ortofon MC-3000 MC phono cartridge Specifications

Ortofon MC-3000 MC phono cartridge Specifications

The <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/phonocartridges/ortofon_mc-2000_mc_phono_car… MC-2000</A> may just have been the most impractical cartridge to be unleashed upon the audio community for some years. With a high compliance (20cu) that made it ill-suited for most tonearms, it also had a preposterously low signal output of 50 microvolts, which gave new meaning to the terms hum and noise. Few MC preamps had enough gain to deliver adequate driving voltage to a system, and none of those that did had low enough noise to be usable with the 2000. If the problem wasn't hum, it was hiss; if hiss was acceptably low, there would be too much hum. At least Ortofon had the sense to be aware of the problem and to do something about it, in the form of their T-2000 step-up transformer, which is the only device I ever found that would allow the cartridge to be operated without a constant background of hum or hiss. Despite all this, I have used the MC-2000 as my reference cartridge for the last two years. Why? Because of all the cartridges I've tried, it is by far the most accurate.

Ortofon
(914) 733-3399
www.ortofon.com

Ortofon MC-3000 MC phono cartridge Page 2

Ortofon MC-3000 MC phono cartridge Page 2

The <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/phonocartridges/ortofon_mc-2000_mc_phono_car… MC-2000</A> may just have been the most impractical cartridge to be unleashed upon the audio community for some years. With a high compliance (20cu) that made it ill-suited for most tonearms, it also had a preposterously low signal output of 50 microvolts, which gave new meaning to the terms hum and noise. Few MC preamps had enough gain to deliver adequate driving voltage to a system, and none of those that did had low enough noise to be usable with the 2000. If the problem wasn't hum, it was hiss; if hiss was acceptably low, there would be too much hum. At least Ortofon had the sense to be aware of the problem and to do something about it, in the form of their T-2000 step-up transformer, which is the only device I ever found that would allow the cartridge to be operated without a constant background of hum or hiss. Despite all this, I have used the MC-2000 as my reference cartridge for the last two years. Why? Because of all the cartridges I've tried, it is by far the most accurate.

Ortofon
(914) 733-3399
www.ortofon.com

Ortofon MC-3000 MC phono cartridge

Ortofon MC-3000 MC phono cartridge

The <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/phonocartridges/ortofon_mc-2000_mc_phono_car… MC-2000</A> may just have been the most impractical cartridge to be unleashed upon the audio community for some years. With a high compliance (20cu) that made it ill-suited for most tonearms, it also had a preposterously low signal output of 50 microvolts, which gave new meaning to the terms hum and noise. Few MC preamps had enough gain to deliver adequate driving voltage to a system, and none of those that did had low enough noise to be usable with the 2000. If the problem wasn't hum, it was hiss; if hiss was acceptably low, there would be too much hum. At least Ortofon had the sense to be aware of the problem and to do something about it, in the form of their T-2000 step-up transformer, which is the only device I ever found that would allow the cartridge to be operated without a constant background of hum or hiss. Despite all this, I have used the MC-2000 as my reference cartridge for the last two years. Why? Because of all the cartridges I've tried, it is by far the most accurate.

General Ranson Raves...some Hi Fi questions.

Hola,

Way back in the day, there was an article about stereo imaging that, as I recall, said that stereo imaging that occurred to the "outside" of your speakers was not so much "intentional imaging" in those areas as it was more of an artifact of phase shift.

I think the article kind of implied that imaging that occured to the lateral sides of the speakers was actually the result of an "error" somewhere in the reproduction chain.

Audiophile Gold Among the 2006 Grammy Nominees

Audiophile Gold Among the 2006 Grammy Nominees

The 2006 Grammy nominations are in, and audiophiles have much to rejoice about. In a year when far too many pundits are sounding the death knell for the CD in general and high-resolution formats in particular, there's a bumper crop of great sounding, high quality recordings vying for a listen.

Sub-$1500 Amp for Two-Channel

Forums

Hi there. This message parallels one I just posted in the "speakers" section. I'm looking for build a new stereo for my soon-to-be-refurbished office-cum-studio (~12x15, eight-foot ceilings). I'm looking for a system that soundstages and images well, and is detailed, dynamic, and transparent. I recognize that there are lots of tradeoffs inherent among those qualities at my price point, but those are the desiderata.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement