johnnie225
johnnie225's picture
Offline
Last seen: Never ago
Joined: Nov 3 2008 - 9:48pm
High End - Decade of Revelation
tom collins
tom collins's picture
Offline
Last seen: 11 years 7 months ago
Joined: Apr 3 2007 - 11:54am

very interesting perspective. i look forward to your next installment.

Grosse Fatigue
Grosse Fatigue's picture
Offline
Last seen: Never ago
Joined: Nov 22 2007 - 7:04pm

or blind and death.. or this mean to be a happy thread!

It is the worst decade for audio, just like for about everything else.
Half the audio magazines gone and the best writers all gone anyway, more surprisingly half the home theater magazines gone, Martin Logan sold, never to be the same, Apogee gone, Genesis gone, Dunleavy gone, Mark Levinson, Wadia never to be the same, Krell on the rope..

Things will never be the same.

In the mean time we are stuck with Wilson and the turntable, go figure. It stinks!
Even SACD did not make it.
Then they killed the CD.
CDR was going to be the new cassette...

Above all, all the fun and the camaraderie about audio gone.

geoffkait
geoffkait's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 months 1 week ago
Joined: Apr 29 2008 - 5:10am

QUOTE:
"Power cords / Power filtration devices.
Who would have thought that power cords would one day make or break a system...or transform its sound ? I sure didn't. The latest designs in this category are turning heads (and ears) as they have become a new high-end necessity. Yes, after-market power cords were out in the 1990's - but their improvement was iffy at best. Filtration devices, before the 00's seen as better-in-some-ways, worse-in-others, have now reached a level of total acceptance. Both cords and power devices have greatly helped digital playback as it is much more sensitive to noise and other low-level irritants (vs. vinyl)."

As systems improve the perceived advantage of power cords and cables become more obvious. It's a system thang!

"16-bit digital.
A big one. Long left for dead, 16/44 came *roaring* back in the 00's to the shock of many audiophiles. Actually, it roared in the 1990s with the Madrigal Reference, Linn CD12, Burmester Reference, etc. But many thought those were the final advances of CD - esp. with the new audio formats looming on the horizon. As it turned out, the opposite happened - those players in the 90's are now seen as mere steps in a giant series of progress that CD has entered. With the latest CD-only systems, reviewers are comparing CD to top-flight LP and preferring CD...or comparing CD to the so-called "hi-rez" formats and calling it a draw. The creators of CD should have said "perfect sound will improve" - but it may be a perfect format nonetheless."

CD was left for dead by those who were unable or unwilling to find out what was buried in those tiny grooves. The tremendous amount of information contained in the humble Red Book CD is slowly but inexorably being revealed. "An ordinary man has no means of deliverance." - Wm Burroughs

"Solid-state circuits (mainly preamps).
As recently as the 1990's, tube-based preamplifiers ruled the high-end roost, with very few exceptions. And with good reason: transistor-based circuits sounded like...transistor-based circuits. But this too, has passed - gone is the harshness, glare and flat-sounding designs of the 80's and 90's. The latest designs here are proving just how deep audio science can get - esp. when examined with high-resolution recordings and speakers. Tube-based preamps have made progress as well. But the big story this decade was the stunning improvement of its arch-nemesis. And many high-end reviewers are now preferring solid-state to tubes. Like CD, this makes sense: solid-state always measured lower in distortion - so why shouldn't sound better in the end ?

Wishful thinking, perhaps? Even more shocking when a modest, low- power tube amp beats an expensive modern, high-power solid state amp in significant areas of musicality, midrange bloom and perceived distortion. Besides, we already found out decades ago that THD specs are a red herring. The more things change the more they stay the same.

"Compression-driver horns.
Another head-banger. How *could* these be competitive with high-end dynamic and planar loudspeakers ? Don't they have a throat ? Weren't they designed primarily as sound-reinforcement (PA) speakers ? Yes...and yes. But horns always had natural advantages of lower cone excursion, higher SPL's, controlled radiation and electrical efficiency. Horn lovers always reminded me of ice hockey fans: the smallest but most loyal of sports nuts. The laugh, formerly on the horn lover, is now on the rest of us. Compression-horns somehow *overcame* their throat-induced coloration and it's only a matter of time before the high-end world finds out. As recently as this year, the editor of The Absolute Sound said that "it's a rare horn-based system that doesn't have colorations". Just to show how recent (and shocking) this development is. Horns may be the high-end future...."

All depends on the electronics.

Cheers

Log in or register to post comments
-->
  • X