Hegel Music Systems Viking CD player Measurements

Sidebar 3: Measurements

I measured the Hegel Viking using my Audio Precision SYS2722 system. As this player doesn't have digital inputs, I used test signals that I burned on a CD-R. I first used the Pierre Verany Digital Test CD to check the Viking's error correction. It played the tracks with gaps in the data spiral up to 1mm in length without any problems, but there were audible glitches when the gap was longer than 1mm or when there were two 0.5mm gaps in succession. The Compact Disc standard, the so-called "Red Book," requires that a player cope with gaps of only up to 0.2mm, and the Hegel exceeds that standard. But the Hegel's error correction is not as good as the best players or transports that I have measured in recent years.


Fig.1 Hegel Viking, eye pattern of coaxial S/PDIF output carrying 16-bit, 44.1kHz J-Test data (±400mV vertical scale, 175ns horizontal scale).

As the Hegel Viking has a coaxial digital output, to allow it to be used as a CD transport with a separate D/A processor, I examined the quality of that output. Fig.1 was taken from the digital output with a CD playing J-Test data plotted over one "unit cycle." The eye pattern is wide open, with almost no blurring of the leading and trailing edges. The average jitter level, assessed with a 50Hz–100kHz bandwidth, was low, at 389 picoseconds (ps) compared with 340.5ps when I looped the Audio Precision SYS2722's S/PDIF output to its coaxial input. Peculiarly, the Audio Precision's "Active Bits" monitor indicated that, in addition to the expected 16 most-significant bits, the 24th or least-significant bit was active in the Hegel's output datastream.


Fig.2 Hegel Viking, impulse response (one sample at 0dBFS, 44.1kHz sampling, 4ms time window).

The Viking's single-ended output impedance was a low 22 ohms from 20Hz to 20kHz; the balanced impedance was a still-low 44 ohms, again across the audioband. A 1kHz signal at 0dBFS resulted in an output level of 2.51V, which is 1.9dB higher than the CD Standard's recommended maximum level of 2V. The Hegel's impulse response (fig.2) indicates that the output preserved absolute polarity from both types of analog output and that its reconstruction filter is a minimum-phase type, with all the ringing following the single sample at 0dBFS.


Fig.3 Hegel Viking, wideband spectrum of white noise at –4dBFS (left channel red, right magenta) and 19.1kHz tone at 0dBFS (left blue, right cyan), with data sampled at 44.1kHz (20dB/vertical div.).

With white noise at –4dBFS (fig.3, red and magenta traces), the Viking's response was flat in the audioband with the level at 20kHz dropping by just 0.23dB compared with that at 20Hz and 1kHz. The player's output rolled off sharply above 20kHz, reaching full stop-band suppression at 24kHz, just above the Nyquist frequency of 22.05kHz (green vertical line). An aliased image at 25kHz of a full-scale tone at 19.1kHz (blue and cyan traces) lies at –101dB (0.0009%), and the distortion harmonics of the 19.1kHz tone all lie below –100dB (0.001%).


Fig.4 Hegel Viking, spectrum of 1kHz sinewave, DC– 1kHz, at 0dBFS (left channel green, right gray) and at –3dBFS (left blue, right red) (linear frequency scale).


Fig.5 Hegel Viking, spectrum with noise and spuriae of dithered 1kHz tone at –90dBFS with 16-bit data (left channel blue, right red) and with "digital black" (left green, right gray) (20dB/vertical div.).

Channel separation (not shown) was excellent, at 98dB in both directions from 20Hz to 20kHz. With data representing a 1kHz tone at 0dBFS (fig.4, green and gray traces), the random low-frequency noisefloor was low in level, but spuriae of unknown origin were present at 100Hz and its harmonics. These spuriae disappeared when I repeated the spectral analysis with the same 1kHz tone at –3dBFS (blue and red traces), but now the random noise rose by 10dB. The noisefloor in a spectrum taken with a dithered tone at –90dBFS (fig.5, blue and red traces) is due to the dither used to encode the data. Repeating the spectral analysis with "digital black" (green and gray traces) indicates that the Viking's analog noisefloor is almost 20dB lower than that of dithered 16-bit data.


Fig.6 Hegel Viking, waveform of undithered 16-bit, 1kHz sinewave at –90.31dBFS (left channel blue, right red).

With undithered 16-bit data representing a tone at exactly –90.31dBFS, the three DC voltage levels described by the data were well resolved (fig.6) and the waveform was perfectly symmetrical. An inconsequential 25µV positive DC offset is present in the right channel (red trace).


Fig.7 Hegel Viking, spectrum of 50Hz sinewave at 0dBFS, DC–1kHz, into 100k ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).


Fig.8 Hegel Viking, spectrum of 50Hz sinewave at –3dBFS, DC–1kHz, into 100k ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

As seen in fig.3, the Hegel player featured very low levels of harmonic distortion. With the Viking driving a full-scale 50Hz tone into 100k ohms, the third harmonic was the highest in level (fig.7), but this lay at just –110dB (0.0003%). While higher-frequency harmonics can be seen in this graph, these were all close to –120dB (0.0001%). Commendably, the levels of the distortion harmonics didn't rise when I reduced the load to the current-hungry 600 ohms. With a 50Hz tone at –3dBFS (fig.8), the high-order harmonics disappeared and the third harmonic dropped by 10dB in the left channel (blue trace) and by 17dB in the right channel (red trace).


Fig.9 Hegel Viking, HF intermodulation spectrum (DC–30kHz), 19+20kHz at 0dBFS into 100k ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).


Fig.10 Hegel Viking, high-resolution jitter spectrum of analog output signal, 11.025kHz at –6dBFS, sampled at 44.1kHz with LSB toggled at 229Hz: 16-bit CD data (left channel blue, right red). Center frequency of trace, 11.025kHz; frequency range, ±3.5kHz.

Intermodulation distortion with a mix of equal levels of 19 and 20kHz tones was vanishingly low in level (fig.9), though the 100Hz-spaced spuriae seen in fig.4 were present. I tested the Viking's rejection of word-clock jitter with the undithered Miller-Dunn J-Test signal (a high-level tone at one-quarter the sample rate over which is overlaid the least-significant bit toggled on and off at a frequency equivalent to the sample rate divided by 192). The Hegel reproduced the odd-order harmonics of the LSB-level, low-frequency squarewave at the correct levels (fig.10, sloping green line), and no other sidebands were present.

The Hegel Viking offers generally excellent measured performance. The appearance of spurious tones with full-scale data is unusual, but these tones are all very low in level and, as continuous tones at 0dBFS are almost never found in real music, this behavior won't have subjective consequences.—John Atkinson

COMPANY INFO
Hegel Music Systems
PB26, Blindern
0314, Oslo
Norway
usa@hegel.com
(413) 224-2480
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
jtshaw's picture

The Hegel Viking appears to be a fine choice for one's last CD player. I opted for a Bryston BCD-3 a couple of years ago for the same purpose. If I were in the market again, the Luxman D-03X would get serious consideration, as it could prove the perfect match to my Luxman integrated amplifier.

To respond to the "Why bother?" question: I still have some quite rare CDs that are central to my enjoyment of music. The CDs sound very, very good through my particular system. That's enough to justify the choice to me, though clearly your mileage may vary.

I'm not opposed to streaming, though I have not approached streaming in a high-end fashion. So far I've been happy with the SiriusXM app on my iPad, which surprised me by offering Pandora radio channels. So, I can set the app to the Pandora channel for Bill Evans and let it go for hours at a time. It's clearly not a high-definition stream, but it often sounds remarkably good through a T+A Elektroakustic Cala CDR. That T+A unit boggles me as an example of how good a contemporary all-in-one can sound. But that's another story to post to a different article.

Cheers and happy holidays to all!

JohnnyThunder2.0's picture

your sonic tastes leaned towards the rich, tubey and euphonic ? I ask as I am in the market to replace a dying Italian made tube CD player with something similar. But there is something very intriguing about a cd player as smartly engineered as the Hegel. Herb never once called it analytical or thin sounding....

Ortofan's picture

... toward the rich, tubey and euphonic - and your budget can reach to about $6K - then you should be considering the Luxman D-380.
It has a tube output stage, with a front panel switch to select between it and the solid-state output.
Also, it has two different digital filters, which are selectable from the remote control.

https://luxmanamerica.com/product/d-380/

beeswax's picture

I use a Bryston BCD-3, which was born of the same objectives (no-frills Redbook CD player) and uses the same chip as the Viking precursor, the Mohican. It may not be applicable to you, but I've found that there is richness when there is richness in the source recording and dryness on less-well engineered recordings. It's up to the disc. Then again, I've never understood the use of tubes in a CD player, so there is that. Herb loves color and texture in his sound. I would trust this player is going to meet your needs.

cognoscente's picture

I have a Hegel, the old H360 (as a USB receiver, reclocker and preamplifier in combination with the Holo Audio Spring 3 KTE DAC and Nad C298 power amplifier, what a fantastic combination but that's besides the point) so what I want to say, I have sympathy for Hegel, sure, but if you still feel the need to buy a separate CD drive / transport, then the 2.5 cheaper TEAC VRDS-701T is the ultimate device for you I think. Or the more or less similarly priced (as the Teac) Cyrus CD Xt Signature. I have a really large CD collection, built up from the mid-eighties until a few years ago, but I now swear by the convenience and better quality of Hi-Res files of purchased AIFF files stored (no streaming!!!) on my iPod .... i mean iPhone (with the ONKYO Hi-Res app)..

Charles E Flynn's picture

From TEAC VRDS 701T - Review at https://theartofsound.net/forum/showthread.php?76886-TEAC-VRDS-701T-Review

I spent a while looking for alternatives. Surprisingly there are quite a few CD players and dedicated CD transports on the market and new ones seem to appear every couple of months. My criteria were:

No blue LEDs or displays
No LCD screens
Must be draw loading or top loading
Must look good overall.

Charles E Flynn's picture

http://www.rubatoappassionato.es/audio-es.html

Click the "Audio" button at the left.

The compact disc "Le Temple du Goût" appears to be out of print. I bought one on eBay last night. I hope others can find a copy.

JohnnyThunder2.0's picture

That's at the top of my spending limit but it's beautiful, well made and it seems to check all the boxes. I was hoping to get away with buying something in the 3k range, but as this one needs to last a lifetime, it may be worth the outlay.

PredatorZ's picture

For playing CDs and SACDs I use a Sony UBP-X800M2 Blu-Ray Disc Player and I run it through my Denafrips AresII and get wonderful sound, compared to streaming it is alive with ambience and air, something I find missing in streaming.

hollowman's picture

This question mostly for JA, but anyone can chime in.
Way back when -- 1990s -- JA (and maybe TJN and RH) used to measure square wave performance of DACs and CD players. Even way back when, SW perf. was not routine. (i.e., not every DAC or CDP that came in for review was square wave'd). Why was this test abandoned?
Please comment on the importance (or non-importance) of conducting square-wave tests, especially over >1k. Say, 12k.
See:
https://www.stereophile.com/content/quality-lies-details-page-3
https://www.stereophile.com/content/musical-fidelity-x-24k-da-processor-...

NOTE: AUDIO magazine was more consistent in measuring square waves from the begining of the CD era right thru the 1980s. But seemed to have also abandoned measuring in early 1990s.
https://gammaelectronics.xyz/audio_12-1987_technics.html

orfeo_monteverdi's picture

[please forgive my poor English]

As an aside,

Thank you Herb for sharing Gieseking's interpretation. I will listen to it asap.

Personally, I am delighted by the interpretation of Hungarian pianist Zoltan Kocsis. Very good recording BTW, some reverberation but really fine-sounding.

Suite Bergamasque, Estampes, Images; by Zoltan Kocsis - Philips.

X