tomjtx
tomjtx's picture
Offline
Last seen: 10 years 2 months ago
Joined: Nov 12 2006 - 2:53pm
Bannable offenses
tomjtx
tomjtx's picture
Offline
Last seen: 10 years 2 months ago
Joined: Nov 12 2006 - 2:53pm

Got another

Inscrutability w/o being entertaining= perm ban

Inscrutability while entertaining= no ban (you are safe, Lamont)

dbowker
dbowker's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 2 weeks ago
Joined: May 8 2007 - 6:37am

I do believe an "official" bannable offence is to call for another poster to be banned. Posted by Stephen a few months ago I think.

tomjtx
tomjtx's picture
Offline
Last seen: 10 years 2 months ago
Joined: Nov 12 2006 - 2:53pm


Quote:
I do believe an "official" bannable offence is to call for another poster to be banned. Posted by Stephen a few months ago I think.

This is meant to be a goof, Doug. Just to lighten things up.
I am not calling for anyone to be banned.

dbowker
dbowker's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 2 weeks ago
Joined: May 8 2007 - 6:37am

Oh I didn't think you were--sorry you took it that way. I thought the rule in itself was pretty funny.

tomjtx
tomjtx's picture
Offline
Last seen: 10 years 2 months ago
Joined: Nov 12 2006 - 2:53pm


Quote:
Oh I didn't think you were--sorry you took it that way. I thought the rule in itself was pretty funny.

Got it. I need another cup of coffee.

Buddha
Buddha's picture
Offline
Last seen: 12 years 6 months ago
Joined: Sep 8 2005 - 10:24am

Coffee addiction should be 'grounds' for banning.

smejias
smejias's picture
Offline
Last seen: 13 years 5 months ago
Joined: Aug 25 2005 - 10:29am


Quote:
Oh I didn't think you were--sorry you took it that way. I thought the rule in itself was pretty funny.


Yeah, the rule was just meant to be a joke.

Freako
Freako's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 1 week ago
Joined: Jan 17 2010 - 8:29am

Good grief! What am I still doing here?

Buddha
Buddha's picture
Offline
Last seen: 12 years 6 months ago
Joined: Sep 8 2005 - 10:24am


Quote:

Quote:
Oh I didn't think you were--sorry you took it that way. I thought the rule in itself was pretty funny.


Yeah, the rule was just meant to be a joke.

Admins joking about banning should be grounds for banning.

Try making bomb jokes at an airport and see if you don't get banned.

Freako
Freako's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 1 week ago
Joined: Jan 17 2010 - 8:29am

Any rules on this?

Buddha
Buddha's picture
Offline
Last seen: 12 years 6 months ago
Joined: Sep 8 2005 - 10:24am

Too much coverage is grounds for banning.

Camel toes are acceptable, however.

Freako
Freako's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 1 week ago
Joined: Jan 17 2010 - 8:29am

Phew - I'm safe

dbowker
dbowker's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 2 weeks ago
Joined: May 8 2007 - 6:37am

Actually, exceedingly cheesy animated GIFs should not only be grounds for banning, it should include having all your coffee taken away for a week!

Freako
Freako's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 1 week ago
Joined: Jan 17 2010 - 8:29am

Like this one?

ncdrawl
ncdrawl's picture
Offline
Last seen: 13 years 1 week ago
Joined: Oct 18 2008 - 9:18am

mrlowry
mrlowry's picture
Offline
Last seen: 7 years 1 month ago
Joined: May 30 2006 - 1:37pm

-Talking about music = temporary ban

-Daring to try to discuss the difference in the sound of cables = permanent ban

-Encouraging others with differing views to discuss things in a civil manner = permanent ban and the scorn of others.

-Talking about gear when you HAVE first hand experience = temporary ban.

-Talking about gear when you have first hand experience but not calling someone else an idiot for buying something else in the price range = permanent ban

Lamont Sanford
Lamont Sanford's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 2 months ago
Joined: Mar 31 2006 - 8:32pm

Anything with Britney Spears or Mariah Carey with a French belly.

Log in or register to post comments
-->
  • X