search
I inserted the eVo in my main system in place of the resident McCormack DNA-1 (Rev.A mod) and listened. Ho-hum. The eVo sounded kinda flat in perspective, and thin—not bad, but it seemed in great need of run-in before facing judgment (Bel Canto suggests at least 40 hours).…
That's not what I heard from the eVo 200.2. When I turned up the EVo's wick, everything got louder, but not much closer. The eVo forced me to find the one volume level that suited the sound captured on the…
Description: Solid-state, two-channel power amplifier with "class-T" output stage and two pairs of multiway binding posts. Inputs: 1 pair line-level RCA, 1 pair line-level XLR. Continuous power: 120Wpc into 8 ohms (20.8dBW), 200Wpc into 4 ohms (20.dBW), 1% THD+N. Up to 800W short-term continuous, mono. Input sensitivity for full output: 2V RMS. Input impedance: 20k ohms. Distortion at 1W, 1kHz: 0.01% low-order harmonic, 20kHz measurement bandwidth. Bandwidth: -3dB at 1Hz, 80kHz. S/N Ratio: 96dB A-weighted, ref. 1W out. Stereo mode voltage gain: 23dB. Damping…
Analog source: Heybrook TT2 turntable, SME III tonearm, Ortofon SME30H cartridge.
Digital source: Meridian 508-24 CD player, Meridian Reference 800 DVD/CD player, Mark Levinson No.360 D/A processor.
Preamplification: Sonic Frontiers Line-3, Blue Circle BC21 preamplifiers; Margules/Magenta FZ47dB phono stage.
Power amplifiers: Blue Circle BC22, Bryston 9B-ST THX, McCormack DNA-1 (with Rev.A mod), Sonic Frontiers Power-3.
Loudspeakers: Revel Ultima Studio.
Cables: S/PDIF Digital: Apogee Wyde-Eye, Illuminations D-60. Interconnects, DAC-Preamp:…
Despite its high efficiency, the chassis of the Bel Canto eVo 200.2 was warm after the one-hour preconditioning period at one-third power, though not nearly so warm as would be the chassis of a traditional amplifier with a class-AB output stage. The voltage sensitivity into 8 ohms was low at 24.2dB with both balanced and unbalanced inputs. The single-ended input impedance was a high 109k ohms, this approximately doubling for the balanced input. The amplifier was polarity-correct via both inputs (the XLRs are wired with pin 2 "hot").
The source impedance…
Fig.5 Bel Canto eVo 200.2, channel separation (10dB/vertical div., R-L dashed).
With the output-stage switching noise eliminated by the filter, the true level of measured distortion (fig.6) was low,…
Editor: Stereophile has again produced an accurate and informative review. We are proud of and excited by what eVo technology represents and brings to home audio. When we started our search for a solid-state technology that could capture much of the musical excitement inherent in a good single-ended triode amplifier, we did not know that it would be in the realm of the switching amplifier. Our first exposure to Tripath's new DSP switching amplifier technology demonstration board showed much promise, although it was seriously flawed for a high-end application. More…
How do you know when your system is really loud? If you don't have a sound-level meter, you can wait for your neighbors to complain or for your ears to bleed. But long before that point, a system will begin to give telltale signs—like dynamic compression and increased distortion, which are often misinterpreted as meaning "loud" rather than "distorted."
Well, I don't generally get to that point with my regular equipment and musical preferences, and when I auditioned the $2395 Bel Canto eVo 200.2 power amplifier for…
I had reviewed the original Bel Canto eVo 200.2 quite favorably in the March 2001 Stereophile (Vol.24 No.3), but was somewhat surprised by John Atkinson's decision to put it in Class A of "Recommended Components." It was a breakthrough for high-end amps in terms of technology and efficiency, but it was less than the state of the art in transparency and lack of grain. Moreover, JA and I had problems getting it to put out full rated output because of its built-in protective current limiters. Snipping out the limiting…