I am biased in favor of Paradigm loudspeakers. I've used them for 10 years; they offer good sound and good value, properties they share with a number of other Canadian makes who have taken advantage of Canada's National Research Council facilities in Ottawa. In fact, the first components I bought specifically for what is now my multichannel system were Paradigm Esprit/BP speakers, which had impressed me at a <I>Stereophile</I> show. When I took the step into multichannel and found that there wasn't a matching center-channel speaker for the Esprits, I replaced them with Paradigm's Reference Studio/60 v.2s. But while the smaller <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/loudspeakerreviews/628">Reference Studio/20</A>, and the larger <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/loudspeakerreviews/252">Studio/100</A&gt; have both been reviewed in <I>Stereophile</I>, the Studio/60 had not. The release of the v.2's successor, the Reference Studio/60 v.3 ($1699/pair), was an opportunity to fill that gap.

I am biased in favor of Paradigm loudspeakers. I've used them for 10 years; they offer good sound and good value, properties they share with a number of other Canadian makes who have taken advantage of Canada's National Research Council facilities in Ottawa. In fact, the first components I bought specifically for what is now my multichannel system were Paradigm Esprit/BP speakers, which had impressed me at a <I>Stereophile</I> show. When I took the step into multichannel and found that there wasn't a matching center-channel speaker for the Esprits, I replaced them with Paradigm's Reference Studio/60 v.2s. But while the smaller <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/loudspeakerreviews/628">Reference Studio/20</A>, and the larger <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/loudspeakerreviews/252">Studio/100</A&gt; have both been reviewed in <I>Stereophile</I>, the Studio/60 had not. The release of the v.2's successor, the Reference Studio/60 v.3 ($1699/pair), was an opportunity to fill that gap.

I am biased in favor of Paradigm loudspeakers. I've used them for 10 years; they offer good sound and good value, properties they share with a number of other Canadian makes who have taken advantage of Canada's National Research Council facilities in Ottawa. In fact, the first components I bought specifically for what is now my multichannel system were Paradigm Esprit/BP speakers, which had impressed me at a <I>Stereophile</I> show. When I took the step into multichannel and found that there wasn't a matching center-channel speaker for the Esprits, I replaced them with Paradigm's Reference Studio/60 v.2s. But while the smaller <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/loudspeakerreviews/628">Reference Studio/20</A>, and the larger <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/loudspeakerreviews/252">Studio/100</A&gt; have both been reviewed in <I>Stereophile</I>, the Studio/60 had not. The release of the v.2's successor, the Reference Studio/60 v.3 ($1699/pair), was an opportunity to fill that gap.

Loudspeaker cabinet design has been strongly influenced by home theater. Large floorstanding cabinets, required for reproduction of bass frequencies, are being replaced by tall, graceful towers with small footprints. While these slim speakers fit more easily into home d&#233;cor and living spaces, to fill out their bass response they depend on being used with the subwoofers that are standard in multichannel systems.

Loudspeaker cabinet design has been strongly influenced by home theater. Large floorstanding cabinets, required for reproduction of bass frequencies, are being replaced by tall, graceful towers with small footprints. While these slim speakers fit more easily into home d&#233;cor and living spaces, to fill out their bass response they depend on being used with the subwoofers that are standard in multichannel systems.

Loudspeaker cabinet design has been strongly influenced by home theater. Large floorstanding cabinets, required for reproduction of bass frequencies, are being replaced by tall, graceful towers with small footprints. While these slim speakers fit more easily into home d&#233;cor and living spaces, to fill out their bass response they depend on being used with the subwoofers that are standard in multichannel systems.

Loudspeaker cabinet design has been strongly influenced by home theater. Large floorstanding cabinets, required for reproduction of bass frequencies, are being replaced by tall, graceful towers with small footprints. While these slim speakers fit more easily into home d&#233;cor and living spaces, to fill out their bass response they depend on being used with the subwoofers that are standard in multichannel systems.

Loudspeaker cabinet design has been strongly influenced by home theater. Large floorstanding cabinets, required for reproduction of bass frequencies, are being replaced by tall, graceful towers with small footprints. While these slim speakers fit more easily into home d&#233;cor and living spaces, to fill out their bass response they depend on being used with the subwoofers that are standard in multichannel systems.

Loudspeaker cabinet design has been strongly influenced by home theater. Large floorstanding cabinets, required for reproduction of bass frequencies, are being replaced by tall, graceful towers with small footprints. While these slim speakers fit more easily into home d&#233;cor and living spaces, to fill out their bass response they depend on being used with the subwoofers that are standard in multichannel systems.

Long-simmering disputes about peer-to-peer file sharing, or P2P, will finally come to a boil sometime next year. On Friday, December 10, the US Supreme Court agreed to examine whether online services Grokster Ltd. and StreamCast Networks, Inc. are liable for copyright infringement. Both services enable users to share music and other forms of copyrighted material, and both derive revenue from advertising.