Slim Devices, the company best known for the <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/images/newsletter/306Bstph.html">Squeezebox<…;, has announced what it is billing as "the most advanced networked audio system available." At <I>Stereophile</I>, we hear this claim all the time, and it usually means that a computer peripheral company has added another USB port to a product aimed at the MP3 crowd.
The audio diaspora is split on the subject of bass. Some audiophiles—surely the majority—consider the reproduction of low frequencies purely in terms of the weight and drama it adds to sounds with significant bass content. Others—the generalists—take a much wider view of the significance of extended bass response, noting that an audio system's ubiquitous high-pass filters are unusual in Nature and suggesting that this is one of the factors that separate, at the fundamental level, live sound from its poorer reproduced cousin. When John Atkinson wrote on this subject more than 10 years ago (<I>Stereophile</I>, November 1995, "<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/asweseeit/75">As We See It</A>"), he quoted a memorable line by Kal Rubinson that encapsulates this latter view: "Something in Nature abhors a capacitor."
The audio diaspora is split on the subject of bass. Some audiophiles—surely the majority—consider the reproduction of low frequencies purely in terms of the weight and drama it adds to sounds with significant bass content. Others—the generalists—take a much wider view of the significance of extended bass response, noting that an audio system's ubiquitous high-pass filters are unusual in Nature and suggesting that this is one of the factors that separate, at the fundamental level, live sound from its poorer reproduced cousin. When John Atkinson wrote on this subject more than 10 years ago (<I>Stereophile</I>, November 1995, "<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/asweseeit/75">As We See It</A>"), he quoted a memorable line by Kal Rubinson that encapsulates this latter view: "Something in Nature abhors a capacitor."
It seems these days that everybody and his brother is doing something about room equalization. Sure, we had the old-time graphic and parametric EQs—now we're seeing much more sophisticated and dedicated devices, from the <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/roomtreatments/437">TacT</A> and <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/solidpreamps/278">Z-Systems</A> standalone products to the auto-setup and EQ systems found in many A/V receivers. I was impressed with the Audyssey MultEQxt in the Denon AV-4806 receiver—see my "<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/musicintheround/306mitr">Music in the Round</A>" column in March, p.50—and a standalone AudysseyPro unit was demonstrated at the 2006 Consumer Electronics Show.
It seems these days that everybody and his brother is doing something about room equalization. Sure, we had the old-time graphic and parametric EQs—now we're seeing much more sophisticated and dedicated devices, from the <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/roomtreatments/437">TacT</A> and <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/solidpreamps/278">Z-Systems</A> standalone products to the auto-setup and EQ systems found in many A/V receivers. I was impressed with the Audyssey MultEQxt in the Denon AV-4806 receiver—see my "<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/musicintheround/306mitr">Music in the Round</A>" column in March, p.50—and a standalone AudysseyPro unit was demonstrated at the 2006 Consumer Electronics Show.
It seems these days that everybody and his brother is doing something about room equalization. Sure, we had the old-time graphic and parametric EQs—now we're seeing much more sophisticated and dedicated devices, from the <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/roomtreatments/437">TacT</A> and <A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/solidpreamps/278">Z-Systems</A> standalone products to the auto-setup and EQ systems found in many A/V receivers. I was impressed with the Audyssey MultEQxt in the Denon AV-4806 receiver—see my "<A HREF="http://www.stereophile.com/musicintheround/306mitr">Music in the Round</A>" column in March, p.50—and a standalone AudysseyPro unit was demonstrated at the 2006 Consumer Electronics Show.
Well, as I posted earlier, a new cartridge and a new cleaning system has me fired up about vinyl again. A big drawback to vinyl is, of course, portability. I've burned vinyl to cd, using both Mac and PC. It sounds good, but it's a pain in the ass and it eats up hard drive space.
Has anyone burned vinyl to cd using a stand alone CD recorder? How easy/hard is it? How do you separate tracks? This type of recorder is getting very affordable, so I'm thinkin'.
As it did for so many other designers and manufacturers of specialty audio gear, the current occupation of Basis owner/designer A.J. Conti began as a hobby and personal quest. A longtime audiophile and home-based dealer of brands like Krell and Quicksilver, Conti decided to build his own "killer" turntable using a fluid-damped suspension.
As it did for so many other designers and manufacturers of specialty audio gear, the current occupation of Basis owner/designer A.J. Conti began as a hobby and personal quest. A longtime audiophile and home-based dealer of brands like Krell and Quicksilver, Conti decided to build his own "killer" turntable using a fluid-damped suspension.
Well, as I posted earlier, a new cartridge and a new cleaning system has me fired up about vinyl again. A big drawback to vinyl is, of course, portability. I've burned vinyl to cd, using both Mac and PC. It sounds good, but it's a pain in the ass and it eats up hard drive space.
Has anyone burned vinyl to cd using a stand alone CD recorder? How easy/hard is it? How do you separate tracks? This type of recorder is getting very affordable, so I'm thinkin'.