http://www.highfidelityreview.com/news/sacd.asp

So much for accuracy etc. Why would hi fi people keep trying to push obsolete, distorted recordings. When teh mag is all about reproduction, most lifelike etc. Seems like some kind of conflict. Analog is NOT better, it's just more distortion. http://www.record-producer.com/learn.cfm?a=1881

http://www.record-producer.com/learn.cfm?a=3476

they can't take on something new, like SACD/DSD. Unwilling to accept the fact, that new is probably better. Same logic on why they THINK old vacuum tubes sound better. It's just plain ole' fashion stubborness. Do they think an old 1954 DeSoto is better than a current Audi/VW with turbo ABS, ....wake up old people. RCA Victor dog is dead, but then 50 cent and hip hop ain't music either, I can't listen to that crap!!!!

http://www.record-producer.com/learn.cfm?a=32

When SACD players came on the market a few years ago, I was hesitant to get one because there weren't many CD titles being released in the format. I thought that I would wait awhile and see if it caught on with the public before making an investment in an SACD player. It seems that it hasn't caught on, as I see very few new titles and almost no advertising for the format. I bought a few of the hybrid CD's out of curiosity, such as The Rolling Stones and Bob Dylan.

difference when your amp is on or off over time. Ckts in this article work from 80c to -40C...Yeah warm up your home amplifier, and you can hear teh differences. http://www.edn.com/article/CA6426879.html?nid=2431&rid=1573873752