In 1989, Cambridge Audio, then run by Stan Curtis—who is still active in hi-fi— introduced their DAC 1. At about the same time, within a few weeks of each other, Arcam introduced their Delta Black Box and Musical Fidelity their Digilog. I forget who was first among the three. Arcam, I think. But the DAC race was on, led by the British. (There was even a DAC called the Dacula.) US companies got into the DAC race, too—at higher prices, of course.
In 1989, Cambridge Audio, then run by Stan Curtis—who is still active in hi-fi— introduced their DAC 1. At about the same time, within a few weeks of each other, Arcam introduced their Delta Black Box and Musical Fidelity their Digilog. I forget who was first among the three. Arcam, I think. But the DAC race was on, led by the British. (There was even a DAC called the Dacula.) US companies got into the DAC race, too—at higher prices, of course.
In 1989, Cambridge Audio, then run by Stan Curtiswho is still active in hi-fi introduced their DAC 1. At about the same time, within a few weeks of each other, Arcam introduced their Delta Black Box and Musical Fidelity their Digilog. I forget who was first among the three. Arcam, I think. But the DAC race was on, led by the British. (There was even a DAC called the Dacula.) US companies got into the DAC race, tooat higher prices, of course.
I've heard some say that carefully-ripped and burned copies of an original (pressed) CD -- using high-quality CD-Rs -- can sound better than the orig disc. Theoretically, this is possible if the orig CD media (disc material/construction) was of poor quality AND the ripping software was able to retrieve all orig bits. What's your experience? (I use EAC to rip and Nero to burn on a Windows XP PC using an inexpensive (but high-rated) Benq 1640 or 1655. I use the slowest burn speed along with high-quality (but inexpensive) Taiyo Yuden CD-Rs. I can't hear diffs)
Opinions please. Only interested in 2 channel audio playback of Cds & Hi-Rez discs; Video secondary. If I could get a player w/out Video in this price area, I would! Do all of these have the ability to turn off the Video circuitry like the DV-6001? Thanks!
I’ve just found out about a new, and unlikely, place to go hear jazz in New York City: the Cacao Bar at the Chocolate Factory, a.k.a. MarieBelle. Most of the time, it’s a chi-chi caf—on the 2nd floor of 762 Madison Avenue, between E. 65th and 66th Streets—that serves hyper-rich chocolates, exotic drinks, and (so I’m told) killer short ribs. But on Wednesday nights, from 7:30 to 10, jazz musicians—a pianist and usually just one or two others (there’s no room for more)—come in and play.
I just received the new legacy editions of Brubecks Time Out and Mingus Ah-Um. The Brubeck set has a DVD and a live show and Mingus has lots of additional material as well. Both come with enhanced booklets and for me are worth the price of admission since they are classics
I've heard some say that carefully-ripped and burned copies of an original (pressed) CD -- using high-quality CD-Rs -- can sound better than the orig disc. Theoretically, this is possible if the orig CD media (disc material/construction) was of poor quality AND the ripping software was able to retrieve all orig bits.
What's your experience?
(I use EAC to rip and Nero to burn on a Windows XP PC using an inexpensive (but high-rated) Benq 1640 or 1655. I use the slowest burn speed along with high-quality (but inexpensive) Taiyo Yuden CD-Rs. I can't hear diffs)